0001 1 2 3 4 ****************************************************** 5 6 BINGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE 7 MEETING 8 9 May 10, 2006 10 11 ****************************************************** 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 BE IT REMEMBERED that the BINGO ADVISORY 20 COMMITTEE meeting was held on May 10, 2006, from 9:59 a.m. 21 to 11:41 a.m., before Leigh Anne Williams, CSR, in and for 22 the State of Texas, reported by machine shorthand, at the 23 offices of the Texas Lottery Commission, 611 East 6th 24 Street, Austin, Texas, whereupon the following proceedings 25 were had: 0002 1 APPEARANCES 2 Chairperson: 3 Ms. Suzanne Taylor - Corpus Christi, Texas 4 Committee Members Mr. Daniel Moore - Houston, Texas 5 Mr. Larry Whittington - Dallas, Texas Mr. Mario Manio - Garland, Texas 6 Mr. Jack Dougherty - Austin, Texas Ms. Kimberly Rogers - San Antonio, Texas 7 Ms. Rosie Lopez - Odessa, Texas Charitable Bingo Director: 8 Mr. Billy Atkins 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0003 1 INDEX 2 3 Appearances.................................... 2 4 AGENDA ITEMS 5 ITEM NUMBER 1.................................. 4 6 ITEM NUMBER 2.................................. 4 7 ITEM NUMBER 3.................................. 5 8 ITEM NUMBER 4.................................. 7 9 ITEM NUMBER 5.................................. 15 10 ITEM NUMBER 6.................................. 17 11 ITEM NUMBER 7.................................. 23 12 ITEM NUMBER 8.................................. 25 13 ITEM NUMBER 9.................................. 52 14 ITEM NUMBER 10................................. 53 15 ITEM NUMBER 11................................. 54 16 ITEM NUMBER 12................................. 55 17 ITEM NUMBER 13................................. 56 18 ITEM NUMBER 14................................. 58 19 ITEM NUMBER 15................................. 61 20 ITEM NUMBER 16................................. 75 21 ITEM NUMBER 17................................. 78 22 23 Errata Sheet................................... 79 24 Reporter's Certificate......................... 80 25 0004 1 May 10, 2006 2 Bingo Advisory Committee Meeting 3 CHAIR TAYLOR: It's ten o'clock. We do 4 have a quorum. So, we'd like to call the meeting to order. 5 First thing I'd like to do is to recognize 6 Commissioner Clowe. We do appreciate you being here and 7 being one of our audience. If there's anything you want to 8 say to us or any words of wisdom, we'd love to hear them 9 throughout the meeting. 10 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Thank you. 11 CHAIR TAYLOR: Agenda Item No. 1, Bingo 12 Advisory Committee will call the meeting to order, which 13 we've done. 14 Agenda Item No. 2, consideration of and 15 possible discussion and/or action on the minutes of 16 February 15th, 2006, Bingo Advisory Committee meeting. Are 17 there any changes? 18 These were posted online. Does the 19 Committee have any changes to these or additions? 20 Is there a motion to approve? 21 MS. ROGERS: I motion. 22 CHAIR TAYLOR: Second? 23 MR. MOORE: I'll second the motion. 24 CHAIR TAYLOR: All in favor? Aye. 25 Opposed? 0005 1 Committee unanimously approved. 2 Item No. 3, report and possible discussion 3 pertaining to the Price Fixing Work Group. Sandy? 4 MS. JOSEPH: Good morning. For the record, 5 I am Sandy Joseph, assistant general counsel. 6 CHAIR TAYLOR: Sandy, can I interrupt you 7 just one second? 8 MS. JOSEPH: Certainly. 9 CHAIR TAYLOR: Something I neglected to 10 say, that in case anybody wasn't familiar, this is not 11 Billy Atkins sitting here. We do have Phil Sanderson 12 sitting in for Billy until his arrival. 13 Thank you, Sandy. 14 MS. JOSEPH: Yes. On March 23rd, I 15 circulated to the work group two drafts of rule language 16 for consideration and comment. One draft was prepared by 17 Jaime McNally, addressing horizontal price fixing, and the 18 second draft was prepared by Stephen Fenoglio. 19 Mr. Fenoglio provided copies of his draft to you at your 20 last meeting. 21 I asked that comment be submitted by 22 April 21st. Only one comment was received, and that was 23 from a nonmember of the work group. Mr. Stephen Hieronymus 24 commented negatively on Jaime McNally's draft. That was 25 the only comment I had on the two drafts. 0006 1 The staff is now in the process of 2 reviewing and evaluating all the information that's been 3 gathered, suggested language and comments received. 4 Are there any questions? 5 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any questions, Committee? 6 MR. MOORE: Well, Sandy, do you think we 7 should have a meeting or -- whether it's ten minutes, just 8 to kind of see where we are? 9 You know, just looking through the book 10 today, I feel like we kind of fell off on getting people 11 together on some of these topics. So -- 12 MS. JOSEPH: Well, what we hoped was, you 13 know, rather than have people get together, that people 14 would submit their comments on those drafts, and, I mean, I 15 take that nobody really had anything to say about them. I 16 don't know. Do you think maybe that's a mistaken 17 conclusion? 18 MR. MOORE: Well, if there's such a lack of 19 interest, maybe we're looking at a rule that doesn't need 20 to be changed, you know. 21 MS. JOSEPH: Well, that's actually one 22 thing that the staff is considering, and what we plan to do 23 is for the staff to look it all over a little more and 24 decide perhaps what we think might be a possible direction 25 and then we'll get back with the work group and get some 0007 1 more input. 2 MR. MOORE: Okay. 3 MS. JOSEPH: But I would expect we'll have 4 another meeting before the next BAC meeting. 5 MR. MOORE: Okay. Thank you. 6 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any additional comments? 7 Sandy? 8 MS. JOSEPH: No. 9 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. Then Item No. 4, 10 report and possible discussion pertaining to the 11 Progressive Bingo/Alternative Styles of Play Work Group. 12 MS. JOSEPH: Again, I'm Sandy Joseph. The 13 work group on alternative styles of play is continuing to 14 gather information on the various styles of play. Mario 15 Manio has provided information on some progressive games 16 that are being played in Texas and Oklahoma, and the staff 17 is continuing to seek information from other jurisdictions 18 on various styles of play. 19 We're considering drafting rules that would 20 address specific games that can be played under the current 21 law. The rules are anticipated to address record-keeping 22 and reporting for a specific game. We'll also be looking 23 at how to evaluate or judge the impact that any new rule 24 might have. 25 The first game we plan to address is 0008 1 progressive bingo. When completed, the draft rule will be 2 distributed to the work group for their comment. I would 3 like to ask anyone that has any ideas or suggestions to 4 feel free to submit those to me or Phil or to any member of 5 the work group. 6 We do plan to be coming up with a first 7 draft in the near future, and again, we will circulate that 8 to the work group and, in all likelihood, convene a meeting 9 to discuss and receive comments on that. 10 Do you have any questions? 11 CHAIR TAYLOR: Approximately when do you 12 anticipate that first draft? 13 MS. JOSEPH: We're thinking within the next 14 month, possibly sooner. 15 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. Any suggestions or 16 any comments for Sandy? 17 MR. MANIO: No suggestion, but there is 18 something that I would like to present to the work group so 19 that they can explore the possibility of this style of 20 bingo. And let me pass this around to the committee 21 members. 22 This style of bingo is very popular outside 23 the U.S., and there are two main differences from the bingo 24 that we know in Texas today compared to this style of 25 bingo. First of all, there are only 16 squares instead of 0009 1 25, and second, instead of numbers, we have pictures. 2 In the case of present day bingo, there are 3 75 numbers. In this style of bingo, there are 54 4 numbers -- or 54 characters, and like I said, I'd like to 5 submit this to you for exploration. I suspect that this 6 might be a popular game in some parts of the state or maybe 7 even in some neighborhoods within the city. 8 MS. JOSEPH: Okay. Do you have any 9 questions, Phil? 10 MR. SANDERSON: The current rule that we 11 have, 402.301, addresses Loteria. Paragraph G, the symbols 12 or pictures may be identified in Spanish subtitles, and 13 each of the 54 cards contain a separate or distinct symbol 14 or picture. The 54 individual cards may be shuffled by the 15 caller and randomly drawn and announced to the players. 16 The players use a Loteria card which 17 contains a minimum of 16 squares, and each square has one 18 of 54 symbols. Loteria cards are not considered bingo 19 equipment as defined by the Occupations Code. So, it 20 currently is a game that can be played. 21 MS. JOSEPH: And what is this game called 22 again? 23 MR. SANDERSON: Loteria. 24 MS. JOSEPH: Loteria? 25 MR. SANDERSON: Yes. 0010 1 MS. JOSEPH: And, Phil, as I understand 2 what you're saying, you believe it's covered by the rules 3 presently? 4 MR. SANDERSON: Yes, I do. 5 MS. JOSEPH: All right. Thank you. 6 MR. MANIO: Right. But it -- still there's 7 a possibility of it -- I realize that it might make quite a 8 change in the code to make this legal in the state of 9 Texas. That's not impossible to do. 10 The thing for us to consider right now, is 11 this something that might be popular in -- within the 12 state. 13 MS. JOSEPH: Well, we appreciate your 14 bringing it forward, and we'll certainly take a look at it. 15 MR. MANIO: That's another point. We want 16 to get this legalized. I'm aware of that. 17 MR. SANDERSON: And we have several places 18 that are playing it now already currently. 19 MS. LOPEZ: How is it played exactly? 20 MR. SANDERSON: It's played with cards 21 instead of balls. You shuffle the deck of cards and then 22 you call out the symbol. 23 MS. ROGERS: They play that as one of their 24 games within their session? 25 MR. SANDERSON: Yes. 0011 1 MR. MANIO: But it's also possible that we 2 can find a manufacturer to manufacture the balls with 3 pictures instead of numbers. 4 MS. ROGERS: And make it sort of like an 5 event? 6 MR. MANIO: That's right. 7 MS. ROGERS: Like an event tab, something 8 you play outside of the -- Got you. 9 MS. LOPEZ: Can be played as maybe your 10 night owl game, could be, or something like that. 11 MR. SANDERSON: It would right now be 12 considered part of our regular bingo games. 13 MR. MOORE: So, it has to be under the 14 2,500? 15 MR. SANDERSON: That's correct. 16 MR. DOUGHERTY: Does it go to 75 like bingo 17 or is it -- 18 MR. MANIO: 54 characters. 19 MR. DOUGHERTY: 54 characters. 20 MR. MANIO: Right. And 16 squares instead 21 of 25. 22 CHAIR TAYLOR: Where are they currently 23 playing this? 24 MR. MANIO: In Mexico. 25 CHAIR TAYLOR: No. I meant, is there 0012 1 somewhere here in Texas they're playing it, too? 2 MR. SANDERSON: Majority of the ones that 3 are playing this in Texas are temporary locations, 4 temporary licenses, and down in the Valley in south Texas. 5 They -- The reason we put this section in 6 the rule, there are currently no licensed manufacturers 7 that print these cards. You buy them at Wal-Mart or, you 8 know, five-and-dime store. 9 MS. ROGERS: But if a manufacturer did -- 10 We're just assuming here a lot. If they did make this some 11 type of, like, event tab, then it could be taken out of 12 your regular games maybe? No? 13 I'm just curious why it has to be played -- 14 if it's Loteria, it has to be played within your regular 15 session. 16 MR. SANDERSON: Because it's considered 17 regular bingo. 18 MS. ROGERS: But if they took it out and 19 made it an event tab, it could be taken out of there? I'm 20 just curious. Maybe? 21 CHAIR TAYLOR: Have you played an event 22 tab? 23 MS. ROGERS: I haven't played. 24 MS. JOSEPH: We can certainly add this to 25 look at and see if there's anything that we would want to 0013 1 do to enhance our rule to address the different situations. 2 MR. MANIO: Thank you. 3 MS. JOSEPH: Thank you, Mario. 4 Any other comments? 5 MS. LOPEZ: Can you elaborate a little bit 6 more on, like, some of the progressive bingo and some of 7 the maybe systematic process of, like, how that would work 8 if, indeed, it did become a part of Charitable Bingo? 9 MS. JOSEPH: Do you mean how the game would 10 be played? 11 MS. LOPEZ: Sure. 12 MS. JOSEPH: I'm going to ask Phil to 13 explain that. 14 MR. SANDERSON: Currently we're looking at 15 drafting a rule that would lay out the way the progressive 16 bingo game would be played. It would still have to fall 17 within the price cap limitations of 750 per game or 2,500 18 per session, and, so, it's really going to be like a small 19 progressive. You start out with maybe a $200 prize if you 20 bingo within so many numbers, and if you don't, then you 21 win $100, and the next night, the prize becomes 300 -- or 22 the next session, it becomes 300. Then it goes up to 750. 23 MS. JOSEPH: Any other questions or 24 comments, suggestions? 25 MR. MOORE: Well, Rosie, I think the 0014 1 thought process behind this was, going forward, if we have 2 a rule in place for progressive bingo, that if there's any 3 legislation maybe in the future, because there has been 4 some, that we can point to that. I think that was even -- 5 Billy might have mentioned that, but I could tell you 6 just -- I've been into the little VFWs, American Legions 7 that do it where they don't pay out 2,500, and their crowd 8 grows with these pots, you know. They may only have a 250 9 top game, but if that one gets up to 500, you know, they -- 10 it will help. 11 I mean, if -- I could foresee, you know, 12 something where, if you had all four of your charities or 13 whatever playing progressives -- this is in the future -- 14 if caps were taken off, you would see an increased 15 attendance, you know. So -- I just -- I was just trying to 16 reflect on what we've talked about in the past. So -- 17 MS. JOSEPH: All right. Anything else? 18 Appreciate y'all's input. 19 Mario. 20 MR. MANIO: Yeah, my recollection about 21 what Danny mentioned is we wanted to draft the rules for 22 progressive bingo so that next year when the session 23 begins, it's -- we can present them a fete a compli. It 24 will not hurt progressive bingo. It's just a matter of 25 raising the bar, the limits. 0015 1 MS. JOSEPH: I think that certainly has 2 been discussed. We wanted to go ahead and draft rules that 3 would work within the confines of what the law is now, but 4 on the other hand, it would be in place in the event 5 legislature decided to raise the limit or whatever they 6 might choose to do. Might make it even more attractive. 7 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any other discussion? 8 Thank you, Sandy. 9 MS. JOSEPH: All right. Thank you. 10 CHAIR TAYLOR: Item No. 5, report and 11 possible discussion on the 79th legislature. 12 You don't look like Nelda. 13 MR. HOSLA: I am not Nelda. 14 Madam Chair, Good morning, Members. I'm 15 Colin Hosla from the government affairs staff substituting 16 for Nelda this morning. 17 In your book behind Tab 5 is a copy of the 18 speakers interim charges that were issued last October to 19 the House Committee on Licensing and Administrative 20 Procedures. Charge No. 4 which related to the sale of 21 lottery tickets at new alternative locations and the 22 possibility of increased revenues from these sales was the 23 subject of a committee hearing in Fort Worth last February. 24 Charge No. 2 relates to Texas pari-mutuel 25 race tracks. This could possibly impact both the Texas 0016 1 Lottery and the Charitable Bingo industry. 2 Charge No. 6 is a broadly worded charge 3 that would appear to permit the Committee to address any 4 program or activity of the Texas Lottery Commission. 5 I'm sure you're aware that the 6 legislature's currently meeting in a special session which 7 can last no longer than May 16th. Last Friday, May 5th, 8 House Joint Resolution 37 and House Bill No. 162 were 9 filed. These would authorize the legislature to legalize 10 the operation of video lottery games on Indian lands and 11 also in counties and municipalities in which the voters 12 have approved the operation of these games. As of this 13 morning, however, there's been no hearing scheduled to take 14 up these bills. 15 And that's all I have prepared for this 16 morning. I'll be happy to try to answer any questions. 17 MR. DOUGHERTY: Could you repeat the 18 numbers on the bill, please? 19 MR. HOSLA: Sure. House Joint Resolution 20 No. 37 would amend the Constitution, is what would appear 21 on the ballot, to amend the Constitution, and then the 22 enabling legislation would be House Bill No. 162. 23 MR. DOUGHERTY: Thank you. 24 CHAIR TAYLOR: Are there any additional 25 questions? Comments? Public comment? 0017 1 MR. MOORE: I haven't seen that these have 2 been linked to the school finance plan in any way, these 3 two bills. Are they or -- 4 MR. HOSLA: My recollection of the reading 5 of the bill, House Bill 162, is that the revenue would go 6 to general revenue fund. It's not specifically linked to 7 the foundation school fund. That's the bill as filed, and, 8 of course, a lot of things can happen along the way. 9 MR. MOORE: I haven't even read it. So, I 10 was just curious. 11 CHAIR TAYLOR: Thank you very much. 12 Appreciate it. 13 MR. HOSLA: Okay. Thank you. 14 CHAIR TAYLOR: Item No. 6, report and 15 possible discussion on public service announcements. 16 Larry, thank you for arriving. We didn't 17 wait. 18 MR. HEITH: Good morning, Madam Chair and 19 Members. My name is Bobby Heith, and I'm the director of 20 media relations here at the Texas Lottery Commission, and 21 as you remember, I came before you several months ago about 22 the production and development of a public service 23 announcement, which I think turned out very well. A lot of 24 that goes to the expertise of our staff in media relations. 25 We have run it a couple of times and intend 0018 1 to really kind of get on a schedule of more of a two-week 2 period. It's not flood -- because, again, a lot of media 3 outlets look at this as free advertising, and they're a 4 little hesitant to put it up unless they've got something 5 that they can fill in usually at 2:00, 2:30 in the morning. 6 Rosie has reached out to her local media 7 outlets in the Permian Basin. They've asked for beta 8 copies of that PSA, which we provided her. I would 9 encourage y'all to do probably the same in your area as 10 well on more of a one-on-one personal basis as far as 11 reaching out to them, and we will be glad, upon any of 12 y'all's request, to furnish you with those tapes in that 13 format. 14 In my meeting with Billy, we were -- we 15 came up with an idea of how to move this one step further 16 and doing radio PSAs, and what we can do, if we can create 17 an audio file off of these PSAs or we can create a new PSA 18 and -- into an MP3 file and send it out attached to an 19 e-mail, which is very cost effective, and you can get that 20 out there statewide. 21 So, again, I'm asking for y'all's input and 22 help on this, any suggestions you have. We're open to 23 anything, any new ideas. 24 Again, back to Rosie's outreach in the 25 Permian Basin, I think that's very effective. 0019 1 We have still not been able to find a 2 program to track public service announcements. We have 3 made some personal calls to programming people to find out 4 if they did run it. Really have received no response. 5 Now, that's not to say that we've called 70 6 people and spent a lot of hours doing it, but we have made 7 some personal calls just to reach out and see if we would 8 receive any response. 9 So, again, I welcome any suggestion. Any 10 ideas that you may or may not have, we can help y'all, and 11 we're always available. So, I'd be happy to answer any 12 questions. 13 MS. LOPEZ: I'd just like to make a comment 14 on the PSA. I think it's a wonderful tool, again, to 15 promote Charitable Bingo. All of our major networks in the 16 Permian Basin have actually seen the PSA and asked for a 17 beta format. 18 I have a success story that I need to share 19 with everyone. I've conducted some live interviews with a 20 couple of networks there locally related to the statewide 21 PSA. One of them was Univision 18 which is obviously a 22 Hispanic nationwide and local station, and they have agreed 23 to air our PSA indefinitely until December 31st, and, also, 24 the neat thing about Univision in the Midland/Odessa area 25 is that their sister station in San Angelo is a sister 0020 1 station, and, so, what they did was they just e-mailed the 2 PSA over to the San Angelo Univision station, and, so, it's 3 getting aired in San Angelo as well. I didn't even have to 4 go to San Angelo. It just went from Midland/Odessa to 5 San Angelo. 6 So, again, I think that these are just a 7 valuable resource to all of us, and I -- you know, I'm in 8 agreement with Bobby that we need to do as much as we can 9 to get the message out, and I'm taking these over to the 10 three local stations, and we're going to start airing them 11 now through the end of the year. 12 Just meeting with the news directors of 13 each station, that's all you have to do, just meet with 14 them and tell them your story and tell them what it's 15 about, and pretty much they agree. 16 MR. HEITH: And I think once they see it, 17 it's -- Yeah, I'm proud of it, just because of the work 18 that I'm doing and from the staff perspective, and I -- You 19 know, I think it's just going to take more of that, more of 20 a personal outreach, than us putting up a media advisory 21 with the satellite coordinates saying, at this time, pull 22 it down. 23 So, that's good to hear. That's very good 24 to hear. 25 MR. DOUGHERTY: For clarification, I heard 0021 1 you say -- Did you say you just broadcast them at 2 two o'clock in the morning? 3 MR. HEITH: Usually that's when they 4 appear. Not all the times, but what happens -- 5 MR. DOUGHERTY: I mean, how about you? You 6 going to do it in prime time? 7 MS. LOPEZ: Well, any public service 8 announcement is at the discretion of that particular 9 television network, but they put it on what they call a 10 rotating schedule. 6 a.m. to midnight is basically when 11 they sometimes air PSAs, and, so, it's on a rotator 12 schedule. 13 Obviously if there's -- if it's a -- during 14 a season where there is a lot of political campaign 15 advertisements or national advertisements of that type of 16 nature, obviously PSAs get bumped off and don't get aired, 17 but I was told by a couple of the networks that they have a 18 lot of old PSAs from just -- like the Ad Council that 19 they've been wanting to weed out and clean out, and, so, 20 with something new like this coming in -- this is horrible, 21 but they're going to throw out the Ad Council ad and put in 22 the TLC -- you know, the Charitable Bingo PSAs, which is 23 good news again. 24 So, that was really what I heard from a 25 couple of -- especially the Univision 18 and the NBC 0022 1 station there said, hey, we've got a lot of old PSAs that 2 we need to clean out, this is great because we don't get a 3 whole lot of new PSAs that we can use, and, so, we're 4 definitely going to use it. 5 MR. WHITTINGTON: You said it's got to be 6 on a beta format? 7 MS. LOPEZ: It's what they call a dub, and 8 they are able to -- 9 MR. HEITH: And they can create their own, 10 but we put it up on the satellites usually during the noon 11 drawing or the drawings at night, excluding Tuesday and 12 Friday because those are our -- we don't have any dead air 13 at that time for our block of satellite time, and they can 14 create their own -- if they pull it down, they can create 15 their own beta, but in this particular case, it's just a 16 convenience. It's not that expensive to do. 17 MR. WHITTINGTON: You know, I just 18 appreciate the first step for bingo as far as through PSAs 19 or however it may be. I just appreciate the first step 20 because that would definitely help, and, of course, we can 21 take that and, of course, run with it and help ourself, but 22 eventually I'm sure we're going to be part of everything in 23 a couple years, just like the Lottery Commission, but as of 24 right now, we'll take that. I appreciate it. I really do. 25 MR. HEITH: And I appreciate hearing that 0023 1 because I'm very proud of the people in media relations 2 that put this together, and I think it's a very high 3 quality production, and they do such good work, but -- and 4 I think really the next step is radio, and that's cost 5 effective and very easy to do. So -- 6 MS. LOPEZ: One of the stations in the 7 Permian Basin, which is the NBC news, they also have 8 Telemundo which is their Hispanic station, and they 9 actually asked for radio PSAs to air on the Hispanic 10 station. So, I think that's perfect maybe to get it on 11 radio as well. 12 MR. WHITTINGTON: I'm sure the testimony 13 from the charities themselves, along with the PSA, when you 14 go to talk to these people will really help a lot, too. 15 MS. LOPEZ: It does. 16 MR. WHITTINGTON: That's great. 17 MR. HEITH: Thank y'all. 18 CHAIR TAYLOR: Thank you very much. 19 Item No. 7, report on the implementation of 20 the new administrative penalty guideline rules. 21 MR. SANDERSON: I'm going to give this 22 report for Billy since he's absent this morning. 23 The Item No. 7, implementation of 24 administrative penalty rules. Members, we wanted to give 25 you an update on the implementation of the two new 0024 1 administrative penalty rules that the Commission adopted at 2 their April 5th meeting. Those rules were filed with the 3 Texas Register on April the 5th, 2006, were published in 4 the April 21st issue of the Register, and were effective as 5 of April the 25th. 6 Bingo Division staff held their initial 7 meeting regarding the implementation of the rules on April 8 the 10th. At that meeting, the following actions were 9 identified and plans made to follow through on them: One, 10 the identification of existing procedures that need 11 updating and new procedures that need to be written; the 12 identification of internal forms that need to be updated or 13 developed; enhancements that need to be made to the 14 automated Charitable Bingo system and other operating 15 systems used by the Division; methods of notification to 16 the bingo industry regarding these new rules, including 17 announcements in the Bingo Bulletin and on the Division Web 18 site, a letter to all licensees, special inserts in regular 19 Division mailings, and the addition of information to the 20 operator training program; also, notification and education 21 of agency staff on these rules and their implementations 22 and coordination of meetings with staff from Legal and 23 Enforcement relating to the implementation. 24 Bingo Division staff met with Legal and 25 Enforcement on April 13th and with staff from Internal 0025 1 Audit on April 25th. As a result of those meetings, 2 additional action items have been identified that are being 3 addressed by staff. At their initial meeting in early 4 April, Bingo staff set a target implementation date of 5 July 1st. This date will be monitored and, based on the 6 results of staff's meetings with other divisions, as well 7 as their progress on Division preparations, adjusted if 8 necessary. 9 I'll be happy to answer any questions you 10 may have. 11 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any question from committee 12 members? Any other public comment? If not, we'll move on 13 to the next item. 14 Item 8, report and possible discussion 15 and/or action on the fourth quarter 2005 and 2005 Bingo 16 conductor information. 17 Phil is moving over to put on a different 18 hat. 19 MR. SANDERSON: Members, my name is Phil 20 Sanderson, assistant director of the Charitable Bingo 21 Operations Division. I'm here to present to you the fourth 22 quarter calendar year of 2005 financial information as 23 reported by licensed authorized organizations. 24 As previously presented by the members of 25 the Office of the Controller, this analysis covered the 0026 1 years 2000 through 2005 for gross receipts, prizes, net 2 revenue, expenses and reported charitable distributions. 3 Further analysis has been completed on the quarterly trends 4 for gross receipts, attendance, occasions, conductors 5 reporting, and the graphs have been updated to include 6 fourth quarter of 2005 information. 7 As shown on this graph, gross receipts for 8 any given year continue to be the highest in the first 9 quarter. The gross receipts for 2005 are the highest for 10 each quarter of this five-year period. 11 Additionally, this is the first time since 12 2002 from the fourth quarter that fourth quarter receipts 13 have exceeded third quarter receipts. Additionally, gross 14 receipts are the highest during this five-year period. In 15 fact, they're the highest since 1995. 16 The average amount spent by a player has 17 been continually increasing over the past five years. 18 During the fourth quarter of 2005, the average player 19 spent -- spend was $32.72. 20 Attendance is also the highest in the first 21 quarter of each year. However, unlike gross receipts, 2005 22 is the lowest reported attendance during this five-year 23 period. 24 Like gross receipts and attendance, the 25 average number of players per occasion is the highest in 0027 1 the first quarter of each year, and in 2005, it declined to 2 the lowest of this five-year period of 136.1 individuals 3 per occasion. 4 The number of occasions has been decreasing 5 relatively each quarter over the past five years. For each 6 particular year, the first three quarters remain fairly 7 constant. Then there is a drop in the fourth quarter. 8 The number of occasions per conductor still 9 remains fairly constant each quarter, somewhere between 24 10 and 26 occasions per quarter on average. The number of 11 conductors reporting tends to increase each quarter 12 throughout each year, but continues to decrease from year 13 to year. 14 Here's a slide that's showing an analysis 15 of gross receipts and attendance. As gross receipts 16 increases and attendance decreases, the average spend per 17 player has increased. Number of occasions continue to 18 decline, as well as the number of players per occasion. 19 However, the average number of occasions per conductor 20 remains fairly constant, as the number of conductors 21 reporting each year continues to decline. 22 Fewer conductors are conducting the same 23 number of occasions, resulting in total occasions 24 declining. Fewer individuals are attending fewer 25 occasions, resulting in a decline in attendance, average 0028 1 attendance per occasion. However, those individuals 2 attending are spending more per occasion, resulting in an 3 increase in gross receipts. 4 Now for the fourth quarter data as reported 5 by the conductors. Prize payouts for regular bingo in the 6 fourth quarter were 75.5 percent. Prize payout percentages 7 for instant bingo was 73.2 percent. 8 Here is a chart indicating disbursements 9 other than prizes as a percentage of gross receipts: the 10 highest being rent payments at 6 percent; salary for 11 callers, cashiers and ushers at 5.9 percent; charitable 12 distributions at 4.5 percent; lease payments to 13 distributors, 3.1 percent; with the remainder of other 14 expenses all under 2 percent each. 15 This pie chart is a graphic indication of 16 what percent each expense is as it relates to total 17 expenses, once again not including prize payouts. Salaries 18 for janitorial, callers, cashiers, ushers, security, legal 19 and accounting account for almost 55 percent of total 20 expenses. When you include rent payments, the amount 21 represents over 92 percent of the total expenses. 22 Commissioner Cox had asked at a previous 23 Commission meeting where we were discussing the third 24 quarter information to see something on average attendance 25 per occasion. The previous slide did show you the average 0029 1 attendance per occasion, and that number is declining as 2 well. 3 However, I would like to give you some 4 additional information on averages per occasion. The 5 average net receipts, which is gross minus prizes, per 6 occasion has been increasing since 2002. Total expenses 7 have been increasing as well. 8 Net revenue has shown an increase from $214 9 per occasion to $226 per occasion. This is the amount that 10 the organization should have available to distribute for 11 charitable purposes. 12 And here is the average charitable 13 distribution per occasion. All of these items, for the 14 most, part have been increasing, and now here's your 15 average attendance per occasion, and it has decreased from 16 almost 152 to 140 percent per occasion. 17 An additional comparison was performed on 18 the information reported in 2005 to information reported in 19 1994, and I guess the reason being is that gross receipts 20 and prizes paid for these two years were almost identical. 21 If you look at the table, you can see gross receipts -- it 22 shows a 0.2 percent increase, while prizes were less than a 23 tenth of a percent increase. 24 The number of conductors reporting 25 decreased 33.9 percent. Number of occasions decreased 21.3 0030 1 percent. Rent payments decreased 0.7 percent. Your 2 mortgage payments had an increase of 135 percent. Total 3 expenses increased 17.8 percent. Charitable distributions 4 decreased 38 percent, while required distributions 5 decreased 48 percent, and the average amount spent per 6 player increased 68.3 percent, and the average number of 7 players per occasion decreased 27.3 percent. 8 After seeing this table, the commissioners 9 requested that the 1994 dollars be adjusted for inflation 10 and then compared to the 2005 dollars. Items of interest 11 are as follows: The 1994 amounts for gross receipts, 12 prizes, rent payments, mortgage payments, total expenses, 13 charitable distributions, required distributions and 14 average spend per player have been adjusted to reflect 2005 15 dollars. That will be -- The first column is the actual 16 reported information for '94. The middle column or second 17 column is the adjusted dollars compared to the reported 18 amount for 2005. 19 The reported amounts for conductors 20 reporting, occasions, attendance and average number of 21 players were not adjusted. According to the 22 U.S. Department of Labor, the 2005 Consumer Price Index, 23 CPI, average is 195.3, and in 1994, CPI average was 148.2. 24 This results in an average decrease of 24.12 percent from 25 '94 to 2005. 0031 1 Although actual gross receipts, prizes and 2 rent payments were relatively flat from '94 to 2005, once 3 adjusted for inflation, the 2005 amounts reveal a decline 4 of approximately 24 percent. Total expenses for 2005 were 5 17.8 percent higher than the 1994 actual. However, when 6 the '94 dollars are adjusted, the 2005 total expenses had 7 decreased by 10.6 percent. 8 The average amount spent per player remains 9 higher than in 1994. The revised presentation reveals an 10 increase of 2005 by almost 28 percent over the adjusted 11 1994 amount. The average amount spent per player was 12 previously reported as an increase of 68.3 percent. 13 Charitable distributions and required 14 distributions for 2005 still remain lower than 1994 15 adjusted amounts, although the reported distributions are 16 consistently greater than the required distributions. 17 Additionally, Commissioner Cox wanted to 18 know whether or not the decline in the conductors was 19 attributed to attrition. We looked at the same time 20 period, and as a result of unit accounting being 21 implemented during the -- at the beginning of 2005, data at 22 the conductor level does not adequately compare with the 23 1994 data. So, we only looked at the time period 1994 to 24 2004. 25 Here you have 1,060 conductors that 0032 1 continuously operated between 1994 and 2004. This number 2 is an average, and the number of conductors that are 3 reporting as it declines -- and, like, there were 2,186 4 conductors reporting in 1994. Of those, 2,017 stayed in 5 operation the next year, 1,854 continued operation, 1,557 6 continued in '98, and it decreases down till, in 2004, 7 there were 1,060 conductors that remained in operation 8 throughout this 11-year period. 9 This is the number of -- the actual number 10 of conductors reporting each year. In 1994, there were 11 2,186 conductors reporting. It increases to 2,207 in 1995, 12 and then it begins its decrease down to 1,682 conductors 13 reporting bingo operations in 2004. 14 This slide shows the length of operation of 15 a bingo operation. Over this 11-year period, there were 16 282 organizations that were in operation for one year, 17 which would be four quarters or less. There were 299 18 organizations that were in operation for two years or less, 19 and then 292 organizations for three years. So, basically 20 almost 900 organizations were in bingo only for a 21 three-year period, and then the number starts to decline a 22 little bit each year after that. 23 Now comparing the organizations that -- the 24 1,060 that continuously operated through the 11-year period 25 to the actual amount reported each year of the 11-year 0033 1 period, you can see that the gross receipts for the 2 organizations that operated during the period increased 3 11.4 percent from 338 million to 377 million, while the 4 operations during this period for all conductors reporting 5 decreased 4.5 percent. Total prizes for the conductors 6 continuously operating increased 11 percent, while the 7 prizes for all conductors reporting decreased 5.7 percent. 8 The net receipts, which is gross minus 9 prizes, decreased for all -- for both organizations that 10 reported during this period. For the organizations that 11 were in continuous operation, it was a 9.1 percent 12 decrease, and for all organizations reporting, it was a 13 20.2 percent decrease. 14 The total expenses for the continuous 15 operation increased 39.62 percent, while the total expenses 16 for all operations increased 17.7 percent. The net revenue 17 for the continuous operations had a decrease of 36 percent, 18 while the net revenue for all operations decreased 39 19 percent. And charitable distributions for this period for 20 the continuous operations declined 30.6 percent, while the 21 distributions for all operations declined 38.3 percent. 22 At the April 5th, 2006, Commission meeting, 23 questions were posed regarding the stability of 24 organizations conducting Charitable Bingo. Specifically, 25 it was asked if the stability of the organization is 0034 1 related to the hall rather than the organization itself. 2 Additionally, staff was asked about the 3 turnover in the, quote, better halls, unquote, and if new 4 organizations are, quote, doomed to failure because they're 5 at marginal locations and can't really penetrate the good 6 locations because those charities are not turning over, 7 unquote. 8 We put in a request to Information 9 Resources to have the location information extracted out of 10 the ACBS database. Due to data conversion, the way 11 organizations report their location address, 911 emergency 12 system implementation, address changes as a result of 13 honoring an individual or a group, this information had to 14 be reviewed on a line-by-line basis. 15 Just to give you some of the information 16 that was obtained as a result of this research, over the 17 11-year period from 1994 and 2004, there were 1,358 18 different locations where bingo was conducted. Of which, 19 1,021, or 75 percent, had two or less organizations 20 conducting bingo. 21 Charitable Bingo was conducted in 455 22 different cities, and of the 455 cities, 70 percent of 23 those had only one or two locations. The vast majority of 24 these one and two organizations and/or one or two locations 25 were veterans or religious organizations, as well as a few 0035 1 fraternal organizations. 2 During this same time period, 477 of the 3 locations were in continuous operation, and there were 231 4 cities that had at least one of those locations in 5 continuous operation. As of Monday, May the 1st, 2006, 6 there were 575 different locations and 258 cities and 134 7 counties. It is interesting to note that 77.5 percent of 8 these cities have one or two locations, while 53 percent of 9 the counties have one or two locations. 10 The top six cities and the number of 11 locations in each are San Antonio with 41, Houston with 29, 12 Dallas and Fort Worth each have 17, Austin has 12, and 13 Corpus Christi has 9. 14 Here is the graph of the 477 locations 15 where bingo was in continuous operation. This graph shows 16 the number of locations each year during this 11-year 17 period. As you can see, the number of locations where 18 charitable is conducted each year has been on a decline 19 from 1,053 locations in 1994 to 627 locations in 2004, for 20 a little more of a 40 percent decline. 21 In 2004, of the 627 locations, 447 had one 22 or two organizations and 180 had three or more. When you 23 compare this to the 477 locations that were in continuous 24 operation, 358 had one or two organizations and 119 had 25 three or more. In both instances, over 70 percent of the 0036 1 locations had one or two organizations. 2 Now to put a little different perspective 3 on this information. These numbers are graphed for the 4 number of locations each year. The yellow line represents 5 one to two organization locations and the red line with 6 three or more organizations or locations. 7 You can see that in 1994, 834, or 8 79 percent, of those locations had one or two 9 organizations. That number has declined over the years to 10 447 or 71 percent of the locations with one or two 11 organizations. This represents a decline of more than 46 12 percent. However, for organizations with three or more -- 13 for locations with three or more organizations, that number 14 has only declined from 219 in 1994 to 180 in 2004 or just 15 under 18 percent. 16 This chart shows the number of locations 17 and their respective length of operations. As you can see, 18 the success rate for a location is very similar for that of 19 the individual organization. As previously reported, 28.6 20 percent of the organizations conducting bingo were only in 21 operation for three years or less, while this chart shows 22 31.2 percent of the locations where bingo is conducted was 23 only in operation for three years or less. 24 So, with all of this information, we have 25 come to the following conclusions: The vast majority of 0037 1 the organizations conducting bingo during this period 2 stayed at the same location. The one or two organization 3 location is still in the majority, but they are declining 4 at a higher rate, and the multi-organization halls tend to 5 have the same organizations over the years and appear to be 6 more stable. 7 So, in answer to the three questions: Is 8 the stability of an organization related to the hall rather 9 than the organization itself? Research on this question is 10 inconclusive. The majority of the halls in operation over 11 the 11-year period did have the same organizations 12 conducting bingo. 13 Is there a turnover in the better halls? 14 The research indicates that there appears to be little 15 turnover at these locations. 16 And third, are new organizations doomed to 17 failure because they're at marginal locations and can't 18 really penetrate the good locations because those charities 19 aren't turning over? New organizations may be, quote, 20 doomed to failure, unquote, if they cannot acquire a slot 21 in an existing location. There are several organizations 22 over this period of time that attempted to start a new 23 location and only lasted one to three years. 24 The overall analysis is inconclusive as to 25 the relevance of whether the stability of an organization 0038 1 is related to the organization or the hall. Single or 2 two-organization locations appear to be able to survive in 3 both the urban and the rural environment. 4 Close to half of the 41 locations in 5 San Antonio are one to two organization locations. We 6 think this is relevant because there has been an assumption 7 that single organization locations could not survive in the 8 urban environment. The assumption was that large halls 9 could draw bigger crowds because they were conducting bingo 10 seven days a week, while the one to two organization 11 locations could only conduct three to six days. This 12 research has indicated that the majority of the locations 13 are one to two organization locations and that even in the 14 larger metropolitan areas, they are able to successfully 15 operate. 16 Currently, Information Resource staff is 17 writing a program to validate the addresses not only for 18 playing locations, but all addresses in the database. Once 19 this program has been developed, tested and implemented, we 20 will be able to perform this analysis again and may be able 21 to get down to an even more detailed level. 22 That concludes my report, and I'll be glad 23 to answer any questions you may have. 24 CHAIR TAYLOR: Before any questions, we'd 25 like to welcome Billy Atkins. 0039 1 And now if the Committee has any questions. 2 Phil, this is really interesting automation. 3 MR. SANDERSON: There's a lot to absorb. 4 CHAIR TAYLOR: I wish that we could get a 5 copy of it, if that's possible, so that we could really 6 look at it, but it's very, very interesting information. 7 MR. ATKINS: We have, Madam Chairman, 8 Members, had the opportunity, as you can tell, the way 9 that -- and I believe Phil mentioned this in his 10 presentation and was primarily responsible for the 11 compilation of putting this information together, and I 12 appreciate that. 13 This shows, I think, the level of interest 14 that the Commissioners have in the Charitable Bingo 15 industry because, as you can see, each successive 16 presentation that we have given has prompted additional 17 questions from them, and, for example, I know at the 18 Commission meeting last week, there was an additional 19 question on -- Help me out, Phil. 20 MR. SANDERSON: The profile of the top five 21 organizations or locations as it relates to distributions, 22 I believe was the question. 23 MR. ATKINS: That's correct. Thank you. 24 Commissioner Cox has asked for, again, what 25 he's called a profile of -- he said the top five and the 0040 1 bottom five charitable organizations, top and bottom being 2 defined by charitable distributions, and he's asked us to 3 look at it two ways, one on a straight dollar amount of 4 distributions made, and then a percentage amount of 5 distributions made on adjusted gross receipts, and then he 6 has also -- I thought there was one other thing that he had 7 asked for. 8 I don't have those notes in front of me, 9 but I know Phil has been working on that, and we've been 10 working with a research staff from the Lottery Commission, 11 and, so, that will be another presentation that we're 12 hoping to give to the Commission at their first meeting in 13 June on that information, and, of course, you know that 14 very likely could result in additional questions from them 15 that we will research, and as we gather this information, 16 we'll also bring it back to you. 17 There was -- In doing this research, I 18 think it's appropriate under this item to go ahead and 19 mention this: In doing this research, some discussions 20 that Phil and I have had with other staff at the agency 21 have looked at some possible economic factors within the 22 general market and what impact they could have on bingo, 23 one being the increased cost in gasoline and if that's 24 going to have any type of discernible impact on bingo play, 25 and the other is -- As you know, the legislature has 0041 1 proposed a $1 increase in cigarette tax, and also, as you 2 know, a great many bingo players are smokers as well. 3 So, we have been aware of that. We have 4 been conscious of that, and we'll be looking to see if we 5 see any kind of changes that can be attributed to either of 6 those functions. 7 MS. LOPEZ: I have a question with this -- 8 I mean, this is an awesome data and report. What is the 9 next step? 10 We've -- You know, obviously this is 11 awesome information, and what is the next step? I mean, 12 what's the implementation of the report? What is the next 13 step for Charitable Bingo from the data that's been 14 derived? 15 MR. ATKINS: Well, from the staff 16 perspective, I don't know that we've formulated any type of 17 action specific to the information that we've gained from 18 the report. I get a sense that what the commissioners are 19 trying to do is get a true genuine picture of all of the 20 many different factors in the bingo industry and then, of 21 course, you know, any action that did result of that, of 22 course, you know, that's going to be based on what the 23 parameters are in the Bingo Enabling Act, any measures that 24 the commissioners themselves would take. 25 CHAIR TAYLOR: Commissioner. 0042 1 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Tom Clowe, a member of 2 the Lottery Commission. Just a couple of comments, and 3 then I'd like to try to answer your question, Rosie. 4 In the slide you had, Phil, on the 5 percentage of expenses, was that for 2005? 6 MR. SANDERSON: The percentage of expenses 7 for -- 8 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Various expense 9 categories. 10 MR. SANDERSON: Oh, yes, that was for the 11 fourth quarter of 2005. 12 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Okay. You need to 13 label that. There wasn't a time period on that slide that 14 I saw. So, you couldn't tell by looking at it on your 15 slide. 16 It may be in the report or covered 17 generically in the report, but on that page, it would be 18 helpful if you could label what period that is. 19 MR. SANDERSON: Yes, sir. 20 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: And then I received a 21 copy of a letter from Mr. Fenoglio asking for some data. 22 Was that applicable to this report? 23 MR. SANDERSON: An open records request, I 24 believe is what it probably was, yes, sir. 25 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Was it net 0043 1 contributions? 2 MR. ATKINS: Oh, I'm sorry. Mr. Chairman, 3 if I can answer that. He had sent a letter in response to 4 the presentation we gave on the Division's annual report, 5 and he was questioning whether or not there was going to be 6 information on there on net proceeds, and that information 7 is in there. 8 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: So, that is available? 9 MR. ATKINS: Yes, sir. 10 COMMISSIONER CLOWE: Thank you. 11 For my part -- and Commissioner Cox will be 12 here later in your meeting and you can ask him. My hope is 13 that we can get, as a result of this kind of information 14 being prepared and available, a more accurate picture of 15 what is happening in the bingo industry. 16 I think we hear from people who are 17 associated with the industry what their viewpoint is, and 18 to a certain extent, it's a personal, somewhat fragmented 19 comment on their personal experiences, but this kind of 20 data pulls together the picture and puts it in focus, in my 21 opinion, that we have fewer operators, we have fewer 22 people, we have people playing more, and it shows what -- 23 When I say fewer people playing more, that means more 24 dollars per person. And it shows that there's a shrinking 25 market that is the essence of the problem with the 0044 1 Charitable Bingo contributions. There are other factors 2 that come to play there. 3 My hope is that the Commission can be a 4 resource to those who asked the question, what needs to be 5 done to the Bingo Enabling Act, and I think that when you 6 have factual information and you say, now, here's what's 7 happening to this industry, and it comes from the 8 Charitable Bingo Division, it has more weight, it has 9 validity, as opposed to somebody just saying, well, here's 10 what I think is wrong. 11 So, my hope is that all this information 12 gives credibility to an accurate appraisal of what's 13 happening to this industry, this market, and then if 14 someone says, well, what needs to be done in the future, 15 you can rely on this data for whatever action you might be 16 considering. And I think it's very valuable, you know, 17 when you're dealing with an industry that is headed in the 18 way that the -- this industry is headed, you got to know 19 what are the facts, and I think this goes right to the 20 heart of it. That's my interest as a commissioner. 21 CHAIR TAYLOR: Thank you so much. 22 MR. SANDERSON: I remember what 23 Commissioner Cox's other question was. He wanted to know 24 the counties that bingo was conducted and counties that 25 were legal where bingo was not conducted on a map, 0045 1 graphical representation. 2 MR. ATKINS: That's correct. 3 MR. WHITTINGTON: What I got out of the 4 presentation, Phil -- It was great. I mean, I really knew 5 a lot about the presentation, what you was giving. I mean, 6 I had my ideas, but the facts is we just got to get about 7 20 more people per session spending $31 a day, and that 8 would put us right where we need to be. 9 Of course, that comes through advertising 10 and getting these people back in the halls, and that's what 11 we need to work on. I don't know how, but we get 20 more 12 people and they're spending $31 average, that would be 13 about $600 a day more, and I think we can make it on that. 14 Charities definitely have more contributions. 15 MR. DOUGHERTY: Madam Chairman, I'd like to 16 bring out something that sort of jumped out at me at the 17 data to discuss, and that was the chart that Phil showed of 18 expenses up and down. The thing that jumped out to me was 19 that the mortgage payments were up 78 percent, mortgage 20 payments. Yet, the rent payments were down 24 percent, and 21 that seems very odd, and it seemed like, to me, a target. 22 Why are the mortgage payments up so high? 23 What does that mean? Borrowing more money or building or 24 what? Yet, rent is down. 25 Any way to analyze that, Phil? 0046 1 MR. WHITTINGTON: I can answer that 2 question. Most charities -- When you're dealing with a 3 charity, the rent means they're paying a certain amount per 4 session. In the daytime, if you're a commercial lessor, it 5 would be charities are paying four or $500 a session. 6 Number one, they ain't going to be in bingo because they're 7 not making that much money. So, the rent go down for them 8 to keep the bingo hall open. Okay? For the charities. 9 Okay? 10 But if you're on a balloon rate as far as 11 mortgage, it goes up every year. So, you got to pay more. 12 Like every three years, every five years, they're going to 13 come back and say, you owe me more money, because our rent 14 increases as far as mortgage almost every three years. 15 MR. DOUGHERTY: Because of inflation. 16 MR. WHITTINGTON: Yes, yes, but the rent go 17 down because we got to keep these organizations -- In 18 bingo, if you don't drop their rent, they don't make no 19 money, they can't be in business no longer, and that's why 20 we're losing so many charities. 21 CHAIR TAYLOR: I agree with the reasons for 22 the rent going down because I watch that personally, also, 23 but perhaps there was an awful lot of one to two 24 organizations which makes me think those are VFWs and 25 smaller organizations that have their own locations, and 0047 1 possibly their mortgage payment going up is because they're 2 paying the mortgage payment through bingo. There was a 3 huge amount of one to two organizations at a location. So, 4 you know those are small. 5 MR. SANDERSON: Well, we saw the 6 mortgage -- Mortgage payments really started increasing 7 after, I think, House Bill 2519, the one that adjusted some 8 of the use of proceeds. So, that's when we started seeing 9 the mortgage payments increase. 10 MR. ATKINS: And we had looked at that 11 also, Jack, and it was a large percentage increase, but the 12 total dollar amount, you know, didn't appear to us to 13 really be statistically significant. 14 MR. DOUGHERTY: Is it something that we can 15 work on or is it just a sign of the times where inflation 16 is just eating us up? Is that right? Is it something that 17 could be reduced, is what I think I'm driving at? 18 MR. ATKINS: Mortgage payments? 19 MR. DOUGHERTY: Mortgage payments. Such a 20 big expense. 21 CHAIR TAYLOR: I would guess that the 22 mortgage payment -- the reason that you've got a mortgage 23 payment -- I mean, it's going to be in one column or 24 another. They can either pay rent for the location or they 25 can just put it on the report as their mortgage payment. 0048 1 MR. SANDERSON: And also mortgage payment 2 was really less than 1 percent of all the expenses. 3 MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh, was it? Okay. 4 MS. LOPEZ: Could that also be attributed 5 that maybe some mortgage payments would be -- maybe if 6 there had been -- I don't know if this was -- was not 7 included in the report, but might be some statistical 8 information where maybe charities had also branched out and 9 become their own unit and have left a commercial lessor's 10 hall. Would that be -- 11 MR. WHITTINGTON: Charity-run hall. 12 MS. LOPEZ: Okay. But maybe some of that 13 data which relates to that, which I don't believe that was 14 included in the report, that maybe that's some statistical 15 information that should also be included as to, you know -- 16 There might be some charity-run halls and then some are 17 commercial-lessor-run halls. 18 MR. WHITTINGTON: Well, you know, a lot of 19 these shopping centers that has these bingo halls and the 20 shopping center -- believe me, if you don't go in and 21 really negotiate with these people, especially if your rent 22 payment increased -- I mean, mortgage, you can go ahead and 23 tell them, hey, we ain't doing that great, and believe me, 24 they don't want you to leave if you pay them rent every 25 month, a big amount. 0049 1 As a matter of fact, I've had a couple of 2 my mortgage people go down a couple hundred dollars a month 3 because I went in and said we can't pay no more, we can't 4 go up $400 more a month, we got to go down, we need help to 5 stay here. 6 And they agreed. Of course, they got a 7 good tenant. We pay on time. So, they say, okay, we'll 8 drop it a couple hundred dollars a month. So, I saved the 9 charities $1,200 every year. 10 MS. LOPEZ: I guess what my question was, 11 maybe because there are more mortgage payments maybe 12 because there are more and more charities that were 13 becoming their own charity-run halls. I don't know. Would 14 that -- Am I clear as mud? 15 MR. ATKINS: What I think I heard you say, 16 Rosie, is what we can do is we can look and see if we can 17 do this same type of analysis, but focus on units. 18 MS. LOPEZ: Pretty much, yes. That's why, 19 you know, there's a difference in the mortgage and the 20 rents because of that. 21 MR. WHITTINGTON: Well, somebody came to me 22 and said, oh, it's really easy to get into bingo and open a 23 bingo hall. I said go for it. If you think it's so easy, 24 go for it, because it's not easy, and they usually find out 25 after one or two years when they got to make the payouts. 0050 1 You still got to make 1,600 and $2,500 a session payout. 2 If you can't make it, you're not going to be in business, 3 and they find that out. It's not easy. 4 MS. LOPEZ: No, it's not. 5 CHAIR TAYLOR: Is there any other 6 discussion on this topic? 7 MR. MOORE: I just -- I want to say 8 something. I think it's a great report. I think it really 9 supports what everybody's been saying, and I would keep 10 answering those questions that they're asking because I 11 think it will be helpful for a lot of reasons. 12 Obviously there will always be the 13 intangibles. I mean, I look back over the last ten years 14 of the little VFWs, American Legions I've done business 15 with, and, you know, a lot of reasons they're not around 16 are they didn't have anybody to take over when the one guy 17 that ran it for the last eight years finally decided he 18 couldn't do it anymore, and, I mean, I see that more than 19 anything, and I'm sure a lot of people can expand on that, 20 but, you know -- and those are the things that you can't 21 really put into a report. So, the numbers are important, 22 and, you know, that's -- It was a great job, Phil. 23 CHAIR TAYLOR: There is one number, though, 24 that I would like to look at. Commissioner Cox had asked 25 before if we could see reports that start with the adjusted 0051 1 net or the gross minus the payouts and then show the 2 expenses and everything with that money that's left over, 3 and I do think that's an important thing because the 4 prizes -- I mean, as the reports go to the legislature, it 5 just sounds like there's this huge, huge amount of money, 6 and it's all just being spent. 7 And Commissioner Cox made -- at one of the 8 Commission meetings that I was at, said that he would 9 really like to see it after the prizes were out, that when 10 he was in Las Vegas, that nobody starts with the gross, 11 that that's a number that you really can't even use. You 12 need to start after the payouts have been paid, and I 13 agree. I think that that would be interesting to see the 14 reports in that way and give them to the legislature, 15 whoever's looking at them, show them this is after the 16 prizes. 17 I mean, we can't run the business without 18 paying the prizes. It's never money that we've had in our 19 pocket to spend. So, I would love to see the reports -- I 20 mean, these are great reports, but I would like to see 21 reports that show after prizes what percentage of 22 expenses -- what does the ball look like -- or the graph, 23 I'm sorry, look like after the prizes have been paid. 24 MS. LOPEZ: I agree. 25 MS. ROGERS: I agree on that because the 0052 1 prize money is never ours. You know, it's not anywhere -- 2 You don't take that into consideration, but it was a 3 wonderful report. 4 CHAIR TAYLOR: So, anyway, if that's a 5 possibility, I would like to see that, too. 6 Anything else? 7 MS. LOPEZ: I have to agree with Danny, 8 also, the comment that he made about your little 9 organizations out there. The why -- Some of the factors 10 may be that they are no longer in the bingo industry is 11 obviously because a lot of organizations are volunteer run. 12 You're right. Once that one person that 13 has been involved in the business for several years is no 14 longer there, that leaves that void. It leaves -- and no 15 one -- Bingo is totally unique because someone coming in 16 can be very overwhelmed with this industry and totally say 17 back off, I don't want to do this. That happens. 18 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any other comment? 19 Item No. 9, report and possible discussion 20 on the status of nominations for filling vacant bingo 21 advisory positions. 22 MR. ATKINS: Madam Chair, Members, this is 23 just an updated report. We've been working to schedule 24 times convenient that are both -- that are convenient for 25 both the nominees and the commissioners for them to meet 0053 1 individually. We haven't been able to do that yet, but we 2 are hoping to be able to schedule something for next week. 3 MS. LOPEZ: Who are the individuals? Can 4 you make that known? 5 MR. ATKINS: The nominees were Markey 6 Weaver, Knowles Cornwell and Suzanne Taylor. 7 CHAIR TAYLOR: Is there any other 8 discussion on this topic? 9 Then, we'll go on. 10 MR. DOUGHERTY: What was the third one, 11 Billy? 12 MR. ATKINS: (Indicates.) 13 MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh, I'm sorry. 14 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. Item No. 10, report 15 and possible discussion on the status of the bingo caller 16 of the year. 17 MR. ATKINS: This is also an update, 18 Members. We don't have anything to report on this item. 19 Rosie Lopez and staff are going to meet after today's 20 meeting and further review the presentation that was given 21 at your last meeting and consider some additional issues 22 that have arisen since that time. 23 CHAIR TAYLOR: Rosie, did you have anything 24 to add to that? 25 MS. LOPEZ: Well, I'll just be honest. 0054 1 First quarter of this year has been just extremely 2 overwhelming for me, and obviously I've not had an 3 opportunity to invest any time in this particular agenda 4 item, and, so, I have basically nothing to report at this 5 time. 6 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. No other discussion. 7 Item No. 11, report on the 2006 Bingo 8 Advisory Committee Work Plan. 2005 -- there's a slight 9 mistake on the agenda here. And our goal -- I'll just -- 10 If I could remember Rosie's exact words, I would say those 11 exact words. 12 I know that we had scheduled to meet 13 several times on the phone, and one or the other of us or 14 more than one of us was unavailable at that meeting. So, 15 we are going to be meeting after this meeting for our 16 committee meeting. 17 Did anybody have any other discussion on 18 this item? 19 MR. ATKINS: A post-meeting meeting. 20 CHAIR TAYLOR: That is correct, a 21 post-meeting meeting. 22 We'll go on to Item No. 12, report and 23 possible discussion and/or action on the 2005 Bingo 24 Advisory Committee Annual Report. 25 You know, let me go back to Item No. 11. 0055 1 We totally have that wrong. 2 MR. ATKINS: My mistake. 3 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. Item No. 12 is the 4 previous discussion, the work -- the actual work -- the 5 annual report. Now we're going to go back to the work 6 plan. 7 The work plan was presented to the 8 commissioners, and they did approve it. So, that will be 9 the basis of our agenda for this next year. Committee 10 members had this work plan at our last meeting, and at this 11 time, the commissioners did not add any additional items to 12 the work plan. They could in the future if there's 13 something that they see the need for and would like us to 14 address. 15 Our agenda actually comes off of this work 16 plan. So, any items that you are looking at for the 17 agenda, you need to see where they fit within the work plan 18 approved by the commissioners. 19 Now -- 20 MR. ATKINS: And it has been posted to the 21 Web site. 22 CHAIR TAYLOR: And it has been posted to 23 the Web site. 24 Now if there's any other comment on our 25 2006 work plan. 0056 1 MR. ATKINS: I would also just add, 2 Members, that I think the Commission would be receptive if 3 there was an item that you felt needed to be added to it, 4 that you could bring that forward to them for their 5 consideration. They have indicated in the past that they 6 consider that document to be a living document and one that 7 can be subject to change. 8 CHAIR TAYLOR: Okay. Any other discussion? 9 Then, we'll go on to Item No. 13, report 10 and possible discussion and/or action on the 2005 11 Charitable Bingo Annual Report. 12 MR. ATKINS: Thank you, Madam Chair, 13 Members. One of the item actions for the agency's 14 2005-2007 comprehensive business plan was the publication 15 of an annual report on Charitable Bingo activities. 16 The staff is in the process of finalizing 17 the 2005 Charitable Bingo Annual Report at this time. This 18 report will be an additional element of the Division's 19 educational elements for licensees and the general public. 20 The report contains useful information 21 necessary to remain in compliance with the Bingo Enabling 22 Act and Charitable Bingo Administrative Rules, as well as 23 historical and current conductor information. 24 Additionally, the report contains information on many 25 recent initiatives implemented by the Division. 0057 1 You have in your notebook under this item a 2 copy of the table of contents for the report, and our 3 purpose in bringing this matter to you today is to see if 4 there is any additional information that you'd like to see 5 in the report. This same item was presented to the 6 Commission at their last meeting, and they didn't have any 7 suggested changes. Our intent is to publish this document 8 electronically on the Web site, and, of course, we'll be 9 able to produce any hard copies should those be requested. 10 I would just, you know, go back and point 11 out one thing that you raised earlier, Suzanne, and that 12 was the reference to the net proceeds or the adjusted gross 13 receipts, and that is captured in this report. 14 And, otherwise, I'd be happy to answer any 15 questions any of you may have. 16 CHAIR TAYLOR: Rosie, did you have a 17 question? 18 MS. LOPEZ: My question is, is the Bingo 19 Bulletin newsletter part of the annual report or is that 20 not included in that? 21 MR. ATKINS: Say your question again. 22 MS. LOPEZ: Like, you know, the Bingo 23 Bulletin newsletter that goes out, would that meet -- would 24 that not be included as part of maybe your media or press 25 releases, activities? 0058 1 MR. ATKINS: Are you referring to something 2 on the table of contents? 3 MS. LOPEZ: Yes. Yes, on the table of 4 contents. You know, we had press releases in 2005. Would 5 your Bingo Bulletin newsletter be a part of that so that it 6 could be, I think, an addition -- I mean, I think the Bingo 7 Bulletin newsletter is very informative. I mean, I know 8 that I read mine thoroughly. 9 MR. ATKINS: Well, this may respond to your 10 question: The way that we have described this annual 11 report internally is kind of as a collection of Bingo 12 Bulletins. 13 MS. LOPEZ: Oh, okay. 14 MR. ATKINS: It's a lot of the same 15 information that you see in there, only on an annual level. 16 MS. LOPEZ: Okay. Okay. Okay. Good. 17 CHAIR TAYLOR: Any other questions, 18 comments? Any public comment? 19 Item No. 14, possible discussion on the 20 activities of the Charitable Bingo Operations Division. 21 MR. ATKINS: Thank you, Members. Just a 22 couple of things that I wanted to point out on the report 23 that's in your notebook. First I'd like to call your 24 attention to the filing of quarterly reports for the first 25 quarter of 2006. 0059 1 As you know, this was the first quarter 2 when conductor and lessor organizations could file their 3 quarterly returns electronically. We had for this 4 inaugural quarter a total of 46 organizations take 5 advantage of this feature. 44 were conductors and 2 were 6 lessors. 7 We have started a review of our own 8 internal processes to see if there are areas where we can 9 improve. Additionally, we plan on contacting a sample of 10 those organizations who filed electronically to see if they 11 have any suggestions on how the process can be improved. 12 Finally, I'd also like to point out some 13 preliminary data as it relates to the first quarter 2006 14 information. That shows that for conductor organizations, 15 gross receipts, especially for pull tabs, continue to 16 increase. For the first quarter of 2006, total gross 17 receipts as of yesterday were at $173.6 million. 18 63.5 million of that was from regular bingo, 39.5 million 19 from electronic bingo, and 68.5 was from pull tabs. So, 20 what is very telling from that, that is the first time that 21 pull tab sales have exceeded regular bingo sales, regular 22 paper sales. 23 MS. LOPEZ: Wow. 24 MR. ATKINS: Of course, we'll have a full 25 report on first quarter 2006 figures at your next meeting. 0060 1 And one last thing that I just wanted to 2 mention because I didn't recall if it had been mentioned 3 before, but the Commission has now started to hold two 4 meetings a month on the first and third Wednesday of every 5 month, and they have designated the first meeting of their 6 month to be dedicated to bingo-related items, with the 7 second meeting of the month being related to 8 lottery-related items. 9 Now, there are, of course, some carry-over 10 items that appear on each of the agendas, but for the most 11 part, the bulk of any bingo-related issue will appear at 12 that first Wednesday meeting each month. 13 And that's all I have for that item. 14 MS. ROGERS: Their meetings are at 15 8:00 a.m. Correct? 16 MR. ATKINS: They have actually started 17 meeting, I believe, now at either 8:30 or 9:00. Because 18 the agendas aren't as long, they've started meeting a 19 little later. 20 MS. ROGERS: Okay. 21 CHAIR TAYLOR: And we'd like to welcome 22 Commissioner Cox. Thank you for coming to the meeting. If 23 you have anything you'd like to let us know, please 24 interrupt at any time. 25 COMMISSIONER COX: Thank you. 0061 1 CHAIR TAYLOR: I wanted to tell you how 2 much I appreciate the fact that the Commission is going to 3 be addressing bingo items during that first meeting. One 4 of the things that I always felt bad about when I come to 5 the Commission meetings is we do a little bingo at the 6 beginning and then the rest of the bingo is down at the 7 end, and it's a long drive back to town if I try and wait 8 for the last item. 9 So, I think it's really interesting, and 10 hopefully more of the BAC members can come to those 11 meetings now that it's going to be bingo. So, thank you. 12 We really -- I appreciate that. 13 Is there any other public comment? 14 David Heinlein, did you have anything to 15 comment? 16 MR. HEINLEIN: Well, I could always 17 comment. 18 CHAIR TAYLOR: I'll get your form after the 19 meeting. 20 MR. HEINLEIN: I was so impressed with the 21 presentation of Phil Sanderson. That information is really 22 good, and the comments that y'all ended up with is a note 23 of financial thing that really is my focus. 24 Commissioner Cox had mentioned this to you-all and it was 25 the last item that y'all forgot what it was and remembered, 0062 1 and that is to deal with net receipts. 2 I'm kind of a newcomer in this industry 3 really, and, so, as I started beginning to look at 4 charities' financial pluses and minuses and I saw a lot of 5 the bingo information, that everybody was focused on gross 6 receipts and prize payout and then adjusted gross and all 7 that formula. The 35 percent report that -- There's one 8 lady at the VFW hall that I spent several years with. 9 She's passed on now, but every year, now, how do I figure 10 that 35 percent. She could never figure it out. 11 But I saw that it was not important at all 12 to me what the gross receipts was or what the prizes paid 13 out was, and I began right away tracking just net receipts, 14 and, so, on my daily cash reports that I do a schedule of 15 each month, I take every day, every session, and I record 16 the net deposit amount. That's all I care about is what 17 money goes into the bank. 18 And, of course, I always point out to 19 charities when I begin to do their books that there's only 20 one thing I can do for you, I can track the money that goes 21 into the bank, I don't have a clue as to what happens at 22 the front end to get it to the bank, so you're going to 23 have to be responsible for that. But I think the most 24 important part of that is to track how much money actually 25 goes in the bank and then to find how you netted it. 0063 1 Of course, I also look at per person 2 average deposit. I think that's something that gives me a 3 sense. 4 And then as we have begun these event tabs 5 in 2002, I began another column that I track the net 6 deposit from pull tabs. Again, not dealing with gross, but 7 factoring in the net deposit to the bank from the pull 8 tabs, and I've seen the growth just go astronomically. 9 I remember challenging some to get $500 to 10 the bank from -- net from pull tabs. They met that. I set 11 the goal for 1,000. They met that. I set the goal for 12 1,500. They met that. Set the goal for 2,000. One of 13 them's met that. Incredible. 14 So, that's why you're seeing those gross 15 receipts go up, and more importantly, the net receipt -- 16 Larry, you can see that extra $200 a session without 17 increasing people, if you can increase the net deposit per 18 person, you know, that you're getting from the hall that's 19 going to come from those pull tabs. 20 So, I think that's a very important part of 21 the presentation that needs to be added to that, and I 22 really think all the percentages, rent, payrolls, all those 23 factors -- there should be a percentage of actually the net 24 going to the bank. We can just throw away all that top 25 stuff and just look at the net to the bank and factor 0064 1 everything in as a percentage of that. 2 And, of course, with the new reports in 3 2005 having the -- I believe, nine different categories of 4 other expenses has given us a lot more insight as to the 5 individual items, and I've really appreciated that. In 6 fact, I probably -- makes everybody mad, I even would like 7 another couple of items on that as from the accounting 8 point of view, but I think the more detail I have on 9 different items, I can better -- I'm able to serve the 10 client in looking at something and seeing if it's out of 11 line. You know, I really think there's another couple 12 things that we can talk about. 13 That's all. I just would like to have made 14 that comment about the financial stuff. So, thank you. 15 CHAIR TAYLOR: I absolutely agree with you. 16 I also like the items being split out instead of all thrown 17 into other expenses. It gives a much better idea of where 18 the money is being spent. 19 MR. HEINLEIN: Actually, I just did a 20 report yesterday that I had to try -- I tried to back in 21 because prior years I wanted to look at. So, I took the 22 items that I had specific from years prior, and that was 23 cost of goods sold, lease payments to distributors and 24 rent -- took those three items and then I listed all the 25 other items in 2005 and took the total of those items and 0065 1 other expenses, did a percentage, you know, and just 2 percentaged each of those from 2005 to 2004, 2003. Gave me 3 a little, you know, interesting information to kind of look 4 at because I -- Statistical information is the only way 5 that you can base your future. 6 If you are going to try to plan ahead and 7 look at what might happen, you need good information coming 8 into that, and I -- So, I think that would be the thing 9 that I would recommend when we go to some kind of reporting 10 method. If you're going to ask me the items I would 11 increase, I'll tell you that. 12 CHAIR TAYLOR: What are those items? 13 MR. HEINLEIN: Because of the way that we 14 report the tea tax, I'm separating event tabs and instant 15 bingo and paper sales. So, I get an invoice from Danny and 16 it's got paper, pull tabs, event tabs and it's all on one 17 invoice, and I'm taking those invoices and I'm having the 18 girls separate those expenses on a line item to give me 19 paper cost, the event tab cost and the instant bingo cost, 20 and if the cost of goods sold item was broken down into 21 those items, of course, then you would also, likewise, have 22 to have the sales put into that item as well. 23 But I do it -- For the tea tax anyway, I 24 have to go separate them. So, it's causing me -- My first 25 quarter's very busy. In fact, I've had to file extensions 0066 1 on unit tax returns because I just couldn't get them out, 2 and I've got until May 15th, and some of them I'm still not 3 going to make it. 4 It's too much work to go through all of 5 these daily cash reports and pull out all of these sales. 6 I've had to change my sales journal to report the event 7 tabs and pull tabs in a separate column and then a total 8 for the instant to be able to balance the quarterly report. 9 So -- but it was worth doing it because the charities saved 10 an awful lot of money. 11 CHAIR TAYLOR: Right. I have my -- every 12 one of those things is separated, and I know that if you 13 request it from the distributors, they will separate it on 14 their invoices, because they do for me. They never put 15 that stuff together. I think more and more organizations 16 are going to be requesting that in the future. So, it 17 probably is something that I think the distributors are 18 pretty much going to get in the habit of doing for 19 everybody. 20 MR. HEINLEIN: And another item on -- for 21 the materials -- The product coming into the halls is 22 becoming such a large quantity, I'm very interested in 23 talking with some of them about electronic tracking. I 24 really think it would be a good addition to the way that we 25 conduct business to electronically track all the material 0067 1 that comes into the bingo hall, and then as its used, you 2 could electronically use it, and it takes away that human 3 factor. I think we really need to look seriously at doing 4 something like that. 5 MR. ATKINS: Well, I think David's talking 6 about -- We're actually aware of several jurisdictions that 7 have some pretty sophisticated inventory tracking systems 8 that utilize bar codes, and it actually -- 9 MR. HEINLEIN: A bunch of them already got 10 bar codes on them. 11 MR. ATKINS: -- manufacturer to distributor 12 to the organization. 13 MS. JOSEPH: I just wanted to encourage 14 everyone to speak one at a time. I think our reporter's 15 having trouble capturing the conversation. 16 MR. ATKINS: We apologize. 17 MS. ROGERS: That's okay. 18 MR. HEINLEIN: My daughter's a court 19 reporter. So, I'm sensitive to that. 20 MR. ATKINS: David, if you'd like to follow 21 up with Phil, he can share a lot of that with you. 22 MR. HEINLEIN: Okay. Good, because it's -- 23 I've just been recently investigating that and thinking, 24 man, I don't understand this. I mean, where are we -- 25 because this is a pretty sophisticated industry really, and 0068 1 it's getting more so, and with the data that you're 2 providing, I mean, it's giving us more tools to work with, 3 and we just really ought to step into the 21st century 4 here. 5 And the grocery stores, they can't hire 6 people that can add and subtract and put it on a machine, 7 you know. They scan that sucker. When you go through the 8 line, boy, I mean, it's moving like this, and it's only 9 because they can scan that sucker and it goes in and it's 10 taken out of inventory. They order their inventory based 11 on what came out. Well, why can't we do that. 12 CHAIR TAYLOR: One other disagreement I 13 have with you, though, David -- and I almost always agree 14 with everything you say. We can't look for the pull tabs. 15 There's only so much money and so many pockets, and I agree 16 with Larry. We've got to get that extra 20 people in the 17 hall. 18 What I hear from the bingo customers is 19 that they come less to bingo because they spend so much 20 more. So, now they're coming less, and I think that's one 21 of our attendance problems is that they're not coming as 22 often as they used to. 23 MR. HEINLEIN: Well, that's one of the 24 things that you have a committee that is even addressing 25 alternative styles of bingo, and as we identify these 0069 1 different styles -- Just like the event tab came along and 2 it saved our life and it's been great, we need something 3 else to follow behind that now. I mean, we need other -- 4 Just like everything else that's any kind of an 5 entertainment enterprise, the more products you have to 6 entertain with, the better job you're going to be able to 7 do. 8 And, so, as we identify those things -- and 9 I hope that this information that the commissioners have 10 asked of you will be good tools, as he said -- as 11 Commissioner Clowe said, that you could be a resource to 12 the legislature. When they ask questions, you'll have good 13 information to give to them. 14 I'm looking forward to the next legislative 15 session, and if we could identify what they think might 16 help bingo, I think we've got some good resource people 17 here that could really give credibility to what we're 18 saying and present that to the legislature. So -- 19 CHAIR TAYLOR: Resourcewise for the 20 commissioners -- I mean for the legislature, I would really 21 hope that when they come to the Lottery Commission and look 22 at some of these things, that we might be able to go back 23 to 2005 and have some of those numbers showing the adjusted 24 net, everything after the adjusted net to show them. 25 MS. LOPEZ: I've often thought of a super 0070 1 marketing idea for bingo, and you guys can probably chuckle 2 about this, but this is what I think about at times. You 3 know, in our part of the state, we have a lot of those, 4 like, Pronto Check Cashing places where people go cash 5 their checks or whatever, and depending on where your bingo 6 hall is located, and if -- I don't know -- This would be 7 kind of a neat partnership if there was one of those type 8 of establishments adjacent or located to your bingo hall 9 where people can come in and obviously cash their checks, 10 pay their utility bills, do whatever, and the bingo hall is 11 right there. I mean, because we do want those additional 12 dollars, and typically those are a lot of our customers 13 that utilize those type of check cashing places. 14 Anyway, just food for thought. 15 CHAIR TAYLOR: Thank you, David. 16 Appreciate you being here. 17 Is there any other public comment? 18 Commissioner, would you like to give us 19 some words of wisdom? 20 COMMISSIONER COX: I would like to clarify 21 something that -- It is true that I have suggested that, 22 for certain purposes, focus be on net receipts. The reason 23 that I suggested that is because people have a real hard 24 time relating to 1 or 2 percent of a number going to 25 charity, but they can relate much more readily to 10 or 20 0071 1 percent going to charity. And if you give them that gross 2 receipts number, they start looking at that and saying 3 something's wrong here, there's not enough going to 4 charity. 5 So, I think for purposes of reporting, that 6 it's advantageous and helpful to the public to report net 7 receipts. As far as operating your business, however, I 8 think it's very important to control at the level of gross 9 receipts. 10 The -- When I went to work in the casino 11 industry in 1970, much of the emphasis was what got into 12 the bank, and when the casinos began going public, the 13 Securities and Exchange Commission changed that focus. 14 They said, we want you looking at what goes into the door 15 and goes into the till, not just what happens to get to the 16 bank. 17 And, so, the focus now -- A parallel is 18 slot machines in a casino. The number that is reported is 19 how much those machines win, not how much goes into them. 20 If the number that goes into them and comes back to the 21 player and goes back in and again and again until finally 22 the player is exhausted by the house advantage -- if that 23 number went in there, it would be 10 to 20 times as big as 24 the number they're reporting and their revenue would be 25 ridiculous. 0072 1 But that doesn't mean that a single nickel 2 isn't controlled. There are meters -- electronic meters 3 and all kinds of people watching people and cameras, 4 surveillance, etcetera, the accounting weighing devices, 5 all kinds of security on undeposited receipts. They work 6 very hard to control at the gross receipts level, although 7 they report at the net receipts level. 8 So, I ask you in your business to think 9 about what you can do to be sure that all the money you're 10 getting is getting into the bank. Some of the ways that 11 the casino industry does this is by accounting for paper. 12 If you've go through 10,000 pieces of paper, tickets, and 13 they sell for a dollar each, it would be awfully nice to 14 have $10,000 to deposit. 15 Pull tabs, same thing. You know, you have 16 an inventory for those things, and it's relatively easy to 17 make a real good estimate of what your revenue should be. 18 So, to the extent that you're doing that, I think it's a 19 very good thing. To the extent you're not, I ask you to 20 think about looking at that. 21 I didn't see the information that Phil 22 gave, but I'm gathering it may have been some of the 23 information that he presented to the Commission at the last 24 meeting, and I thought it was very good information, and it 25 was food for thought for us because it caused us to ask for 0073 1 a lot more information. So, at our next meeting at which 2 we discuss bingo agenda, we will be looking for additional 3 information. 4 What we asked for here was help us 5 understand why really good halls make money and help us 6 understand why the weak ones don't and -- so that we can -- 7 really for Chairman Clowe and me just to get a better feel 8 for what the industry is doing so that we can be better 9 regulators and work toward a mutual benefit for the 10 regulator and the regulatee. 11 So, that's why we're trying to go with 12 these things, understanding the industry better so that we 13 can work better with you. 14 And if y'all have any questions for me, 15 I'll sure try. 16 MR. MANIO: Commissioner, if I may, one of 17 the items that caught my attention during Phil's 18 presentation was the average amount spent by a player which 19 is about $31 now, and that has been going up. At the same 20 time, the attendance is going down. So, we have a 21 situation where people -- less and less people are playing 22 bingo, but they're spending more and more, which reminded 23 me of the question that you raised four months ago, and 24 your question, I believe, was, how long can we sustain a 25 situation like this. And I was just wondering if you have 0074 1 had any feedback or if you have received any ideas, 2 explanation or speculation as to how long can this be 3 sustained. 4 COMMISSIONER COX: Well, I've heard 5 speculation. I've heard people talking about that and 6 saying, hey, that's an interesting way to look at things, 7 perhaps we should be looking at things that way. I haven't 8 really heard any answers. 9 Although, I did hear Suzanne say something 10 today that I haven't heard before, and that is her 11 suspicion -- or maybe it's an observation, that people are 12 spending more, but they're coming fewer times. That can 13 certainly be part of that equation, Mario, that there -- 14 the product is more attractive. So, when they come, they 15 partake of more of it, but that doesn't increase their 16 budget for bingo. 17 Is that kind of what that seems to say? 18 CHAIR TAYLOR: Exactly. 19 COMMISSIONER COX: So, I guess what that's 20 saying is you're more competitive with the various other 21 kinds of entertainment that are out there, but the 22 entertainment budget is only so big. 23 MR. WHITTINGTON: And don't you think as 24 far as gross receipts, as I said, as a marketing person, 25 it's basically put on advertisements, more so than the 0075 1 realistic amount that a charity might get? 2 It's good to use a gross receipt for 3 advertising, like on TV OR radio. We can pay out this, and 4 we give out that, which most places do. Casinos, Texas 5 Lottery. Of course, that's good for people to know what 6 we're giving out prizewise. 7 COMMISSIONER COX: Of course. 8 MR. WHITTINGTON: But we need to make sure 9 we come to the realization that what the charities are 10 getting is a whole different dimension. It's out there by 11 itself. 12 COMMISSIONER COX: If you go to Las Vegas, 13 what is the thing you see on every marquis about the slot 14 machines? 99 percent paid back, 99.99 percent paid back, 15 and, yet, they don't report prizes paid. They only record 16 their net win. 17 So, you're absolutely right. I totally 18 agree, Larry. Thank you. 19 CHAIR TAYLOR: Thank you, Commissioner. 20 Any other public comment? Committee 21 members, any comments? 22 Then, we'll move on to Item No. 16, 23 consideration of and possible action on future Bingo 24 Advisory Committee meeting dates and/or items to be 25 considered for future meetings. Obviously we'll be doing 0076 1 some of these -- the report on the Prize Fixing Work Group, 2 the alternative styles of play, report on the 39th 3 legislature, possible report on the PSA announcements. 4 MS. LOPEZ: Sure. 5 CHAIR TAYLOR: We'll have the fourth 6 quarter information -- I'm sorry, first quarter information 7 of 2006. 8 MR. DOUGHERTY: Madam Chair, this item 9 about meeting dates, I got something -- I don't know, maybe 10 it was a quarterly report, that already had our dates all 11 set up for the rest of the year. 12 CHAIR TAYLOR: I believe that our dates 13 were just moved a week ahead of where we had originally put 14 them. We were meeting the second month of the quarter, the 15 third week, I believe, the third Wednesday. 16 MR. DOUGHERTY: I thought it was the 17 second. 18 MR. ATKINS: It was the third. It has been 19 moved to the second. 20 CHAIR TAYLOR: So, now we are meeting the 21 second month of the quarter, the second Wednesday, which is 22 easier to remember anyway. 23 MR. ATKINS: The next meeting date will be 24 August 9th. 25 MS. ROGERS: And, Billy, if the 0077 1 commissioners are able to meet with the nominees, then we 2 will need a slot to introduce them, or do we do anything 3 with that? 4 MR. ATKINS: I missed that first point. 5 MS. ROGERS: We're talking about what's 6 going to go on the next agenda. Correct? 7 CHAIR TAYLOR: Correct. 8 MS. ROGERS: Make sure I'm on the right 9 place. 10 If the commissioners are able to meet with 11 the three nominees, then would we need anything there for 12 that? 13 MR. ATKINS: Yes, potentially we would, 14 yes, to have them introduced and take care -- as well as 15 recognize any outgoing members. 16 MS. ROGERS: Okay. 17 CHAIR TAYLOR: And possibly we'll have some 18 information on the caller of the year. We'd like to have 19 the 2005 annual report here for the Committee next time. 20 And is there any other items at this time 21 anybody can think of? 22 MS. LOPEZ: Maybe discuss maybe -- I don't 23 know if this is possible, but maybe one unit accounting, 24 how that's working for halls throughout the state, if that 25 can maybe be a possible discussion. 0078 1 MR. ATKINS: I have the note down. 2 MR. WHITTINGTON: There's still a few 3 things they need to work on, but, yeah, it would be a good 4 discussion, yes. 5 CHAIR TAYLOR: Good. If there's any other 6 items that you can think of, if you could e-mail myself or 7 Billy with them. 8 And if there's no other discussion, then 9 this meeting is adjourned. That's it. 10 (Concluded at 11:41 a.m.) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0079 1 ERRATA SHEET 2 PAGE LINE CHANGE REASON 3 ______________________________________________________ 4 ______________________________________________________ 5 ______________________________________________________ 6 ______________________________________________________ 7 ______________________________________________________ 8 ______________________________________________________ 9 ______________________________________________________ 10 ______________________________________________________ 11 ______________________________________________________ 12 ______________________________________________________ 13 ______________________________________________________ 14 ______________________________________________________ 15 ______________________________________________________ 16 ______________________________________________________ 17 ______________________________________________________ 18 ______________________________________________________ 19 ______________________________________________________ 20 ______________________________________________________ 21 ______________________________________________________ 22 ______________________________________________________ 23 ______________________________________________________ 24 ______________________________________________________ 25 ______________________________________________________ 0080 1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE 2 3 STATE OF TEXAS ) ) 4 COUNTY OF TRAVIS ) 5 6 I, LEIGH ANNE WILLIAMS, Certified Shorthand 7 Reporter in Travis County, Texas, do hereby certify that 8 the above-captioned matter came on for hearing before the 9 BINGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE as hereinafter set out, that I 10 did, in shorthand, report said proceedings, and that the 11 above and foregoing typewritten pages contain a full, true 12 and correct computer-aided transcription of my shorthand 13 notes taken on said occasion. 14 WITNESS MY HAND THIS, 25th day of May, 2006. 15 16 17 LEIGH ANNE WILLIAMS, Texas CSR 4446 18 Expiration: 12-31-06 Firm Registration No. 225 19 Expiration Date: 12/31/06 1801 N. Lamar Blvd., Mezzanine 20 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 474-4363 21 22 23 24 25