0001 1 2 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 5 BINGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE 6 MEETING 7 FEBRUARY 26, 2004 8 9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 10 11 12 13 14 BE IT REMEMBERED that the BINGO ADVISORY 15 COMMITTEE meeting was held on the 26th day of February, 16 2004, at 10:00 a.m., before Kimberlye A. Furr, RPR, CSR 17 in and for the State of Texas, reported by machine 18 shorthand, at the offices of the Texas Lottery 19 Commission, 611 East 6th Street, Auditorium, Austin, 20 Texas, 78701, whereupon the following proceedings were 21 had: 22 23 24 25 0002 1 APPEARANCES 2 3 Chairman: 4 Ms. Virginia Brackett 5 Charitable Bingo Operations Director: 6 Mr. Billy Atkins 7 Committee Members: 8 Mr. Daniel Moore 9 Mr. Larry Whittington 10 Ms. Suzanne Taylor 11 Ms. Patricia Greenfield 12 Mr. Mario Manio 13 Mr. Pete Pavlovsky 14 Mr. John (Jack) Dougherty 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0003 1 INDEX 2 3 APPEARANCES ................................... 2 4 5 AGENDA ITEMS 6 Item Number 1 ................................. 4 7 Item Number 2 ................................. 4 8 Item Number 3 ................................. 4 9 Item Number 4 ................................. 9 10 Item Number 5 ................................. 24 11 Item Number 6 ................................. 47 12 Item Number 7 ................................. 48 13 Item Number 8 ................................. 51 14 Item Number 9 ................................. 72 15 Item Number 10 ................................ 98 16 Item Number 11 ................................ 100 17 Item Number 12 ................................ 116 18 Item Number 13 ................................ 126 19 Item Number 14 ................................ 130 20 Item Number 15 ................................ 135 21 22 23 24 25 0004 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: I'll ask for the 2 approval of the minutes of the December 4th meeting. 3 Are there any corrections or additions to those? 4 They're on the web. 5 If there are no corrections or 6 additions, then the minutes are approved as they were 7 printed and published on the web site. 8 Item No. 3 is: Report and possible 9 discussion or action on an appointment of a nominating 10 committee to submit a slate of officers and/or new 11 members to the Bingo Advisory Committee and/or on a 12 term assignments for Bingo Advisory Committee members. 13 Norma has a plan for terms. We're going 14 to have a little Lottery drawing today. Is that what 15 this is? 16 MR. ATKINS: Well, before you do that, 17 this is the last thing that we need to do in order to 18 fully implement one of the management recommendations 19 from the Sunset report, and we need to select terms for 20 the members so that membership is staggered where three 21 terms become eligible for nomination on February 1st of 22 every year. And so one way that we have suggested 23 doing that is, Norma has nine slips of paper, three of 24 them are marked with a one, three are marked with a 25 two, and three are marked with a three, and so 0005 1 depending on which slip is selected by someone, for 2 example, Danny, if you selected one with a one, then 3 your term initially would be February 1st, 2004 to 4 February 1st, 2005, then effective February 1st, 2005, 5 that term would be for a full three-year term, so that 6 all of the terms would then be for a full three years 7 with three terms becoming eligible on February 1st of 8 every year. 9 Now, I don't know if you wanted to ask 10 for volunteers or if you just want to go forward with 11 the drawing. 12 CHAIR BRACKETT: Do we have any 13 volunteers who want to volunteer for the terms? 14 I would like to volunteer for one year 15 simply because I'm old and I don't know how much longer 16 I can be as productive. The bingo hall gets larger and 17 larger as I walk it. 18 MR. MANIO: I will also volunteer for a 19 one-year term for the same reason as Virginia. 20 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I'll volunteer for a 21 one-year term, not for one of those reasons. 22 MR. ATKINS: So, take out all of the 23 one-year terms. 24 CHAIR BRACKETT: While she's doing that, 25 I want to remind you, and I'm sorry I failed to do that 0006 1 at the beginning, but if you want to speak today to be 2 a witness, please fill out the witness affirmation 3 form. They're out in the reception area there. And 4 also I want to thank you for attending. I know that a 5 lot of you come a great distance, and we really 6 appreciate it. 7 MS. GREENFIELD: I would like to 8 volunteer for a two-year term. 9 MR. ATKINS: Wait. We still have more 10 volunteers. Patricia has volunteered for a two-year 11 term. 12 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any other volunteers? 13 MR. MOORE: I'll go for the two years. 14 MS. TAYLOR: You know, what, put me for 15 the other two years. 16 MR. ATKINS: So that means by default, 17 everyone else gets a three-year term, and that is 18 Larry, Jack, the vacant conductor/lessor position. 19 MS. QUEZADA: Who was the last two-year 20 term? 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: Suzanne, Danny, and 22 Patricia were the two-year terms. Larry, Jack, and the 23 vacant conductor/lessor position are the three-year 24 terms. 25 Thank you all for your help on that. 0007 1 MS. TAYLOR: I was wondering, if for 2 some reason one of the people that has volunteered for 3 one of these terms leaves, does the incoming person 4 take over the term that they would have had? 5 MR. ATKINS: That's correct, Suzanne, 6 they take over the unexpired term. And the terms, as 7 they are established, are associated with the position, 8 so that way, people, as they come on, will know 9 up-front what that term period is. 10 CHAIR BRACKETT: I'm just going to say, 11 thank you for the volunteers. I think maybe this isn't 12 really like volunteering for the draft, that's for 13 sure. 14 I want to appoint a nominating 15 committee, and I would like for Patricia Greenfield to 16 be chairman of that and Pete to represent the charities 17 on it and for Danny to serve on that committee. 18 Is that all right with the three of you? 19 Okay. Thank you. 20 And what you would be doing as a 21 nominating committee is nominating the chair and the 22 secretary and then new members from the applications of 23 people who do that. Correct? 24 MR. ATKINS: We currently have one 25 vacancy, and if you look in your notebook, we have been 0008 1 advertising that vacancy on the web site and on the 2 Bingo Bulletin, it's for the conductor/lessor position, 3 and we've also included in your notebook the three 4 nominations that we've received so far. And the staff 5 will be happy to work with the nominating committee as 6 they go forward. 7 CHAIR BRACKETT: I had served on the 8 last nominating committee. It's really fun. You get 9 to call these people and talk to them. It really is 10 interesting and it's fun. I highly recommend the 11 personal contact with people on that. 12 MS. GREENFIELD: So we would be 13 reporting to you at the next meeting on that? 14 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yes. 15 MR. MOORE: Do we have a list of the 16 conductor/lessors in this state that we could possibly 17 contact these people or, you know, people that aren't 18 looking on the web site? I have no idea where to start 19 with that. 20 MR. ATKINS: Yeah, we can provide you 21 with that list. 22 MR. MOORE: Okay. Who would I talk to? 23 MR. ATKINS: Phil Sanderson. 24 MS. GREENFIELD: Danny, I had actually 25 gotten a list, I guess, in January. I've already 0009 1 contacted some people, so I can get with you on my list 2 and tell you who I've already talked to. 3 MR. MOORE: Great. 4 CHAIR BRACKETT: Are there any other 5 questions or details on this that we need to cover? 6 Are we ready to move on to Item No. 4? 7 This is the consideration of and possible discussion 8 and/or action on the use of debit card rule making. 9 Phil Sanderson. 10 MR. SANDERSON: Madame Chair, members, 11 for the record, Phil Sanderson, assistant director of 12 Charitable Bingo Operations Division. It is probably 13 more of just a definitional-type rule on debit card 14 transactions. We had a few questions, people calling 15 in about the use of debit cards. There was not a 16 subcommittee formed for this particular rule through 17 the BAC. It was just one that we were looking at the 18 uses and the practicality of the debit card. For the 19 most part, it just defines what an ATM card is, a debit 20 card, a check card, and how they can be used, what a 21 personal identification number is, the use of a PIN 22 pad, and it's probably more for clarity to make sure 23 that someone does not take a credit card, which would 24 be a violation of the Bingo Enabling Act, to take an 25 actual credit card. 0010 1 Mr. Oldham, the attorney on this rule, 2 is here to answer any questions and I can answer any 3 questions that you might have. 4 MR. OLDHAM: For the record, my name is 5 Kevin Oldham. I'm assistant general counsel here at 6 the Lottery Commission. Thank you for having me. 7 I've received some informal comment on 8 this rule from the industry regarding credit cards and 9 other issues, and we're taking those into 10 consideration, but I think Phil has laid this rule out 11 fairly well. It's basically a definitional rule. It 12 tries to capture changes made to the statute, those 13 being in, I guess, it's Texas Occupations Code 14 2001451B-1 and 2001458811, which those specifically 15 name debit card transactions. I mean, the statute 16 doesn't say debit card transactions may be used for X, 17 Y, and Z, but the statute does say debit card 18 transactions could be an item of bingo expense if 19 necessary and reasonable and in the conduct of bingo. 20 So, with that, I'll be happy to answer any questions 21 you might have about this or receive any comment as we 22 move forward. 23 MS. TAYLOR: I have one comment on this. 24 I love the debit card thing. I loved it several years 25 ago when we started talking about. I have been some 0011 1 places where I've used the debit card and they don't 2 ask you to put a PIN in; instead, you actually sign as 3 if it was a credit card, as if you're using your debit 4 card. Is there a reason why this requires that you use 5 a PIN number instead of signing? 6 MR. SANDERSON: To the best of my 7 recollection, when we were researching this, we talked 8 to several banks and companies that issue debit cards 9 and check cards, and for the most part, they said that 10 the transaction, from what they told us, that if the 11 PIN number is not used, then it is considered a credit 12 card transaction. Visa underwrites, for example, or 13 MasterCard will underwrite, the check cards or the 14 debit cards, and if you have a debit card, like an ATM 15 card, like Pulse, for example, those require a PIN 16 transaction if you're at HEB and you try to pay with 17 your Pulse card. If you've got a check card, which is 18 issued by a credit card company, then those are 19 considered a debit card or a check card with the use of 20 the PIN. If you don't use a PIN, then it's considered 21 a credit card transaction. 22 MS. TAYLOR: It still comes out of your 23 checking account, though. I know Hobby Lobby is one 24 store that I always have to sign the paper because they 25 don't have the key pad, and it comes right out of my 0012 1 checking account because I don't have a credit card 2 with that bank. 3 MR. SANDERSON: Like I said, you know, 4 that's the information that we got from two or three 5 banks in the San Antonio region that handle the check 6 card and debit card transactions. 7 MR. OLDHAM: Just to frame the issue, I 8 think the way that this draft is written is to -- and 9 correct me if I'm wrong, Phil -- but I think the way 10 this draft is written is to try and ensure that any 11 transaction that takes place actually is a debit card 12 transaction versus a credit card transaction. And I 13 understand where you're coming from, that perhaps if 14 you have a check card issued by your bank and you go to 15 the convenience store or the grocery store and you're 16 just sliding it and you can mark it as a credit card or 17 a debit, I understand where you're coming from. I just 18 think the way the rule is written now is to try and 19 differentiate as best as possible between those two 20 transactions, and this was one way in which to do that. 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any there any other 22 questions from the committee? 23 MR. WHITTINGTON: When it comes to the 24 debit cards, especially during a bingo session, what 25 basically is the way these things are going to be used? 0013 1 People coming up in a line with a debit card and order 2 the product, the bingo product, to play bingo? Just 3 like a grocery store, is something like that going to 4 be the setup? Because if that's going to be the setup, 5 it's going to take a little longer. 6 MR. SANDERSON: If you're asking me if 7 that's the way it's -- I mean, it's up to the 8 organizations whether or not they use debit cards. 9 We're not requiring the use of them. When it came up 10 several years ago, there was some discussion about 11 whether or not they could actually use debit cards 12 because of the time frame of when funds were deposited 13 and available for use by the organizations, and, you 14 know, the individuals said that -- apparently lobbied 15 for this legislation to allow debit cards to be used 16 and the funds from those to be deposited within 72 17 hours instead of the 24-hour requirement. 18 It's strictly voluntary among the 19 organizations if they want to use them. Like I said, 20 all we were doing with this rule was just trying to 21 come out with something that just laid out the general 22 frame work of what a debit card was, and that's it. 23 MR. WHITTINGTON: I can see that working 24 well if you don't have 200 people in line. Okay? But 25 I can see the customers getting very agitated as well 0014 1 standing in line waiting for somebody to put their PIN, 2 they put the wrong PIN in, they got to back and 3 re-enter their PIN again, when these people in line 4 say, hey, what's going on here? So that's why we got 5 the ATM's in our bingo hall. They can go to the ATM 6 and they can their money out. 7 MR. SANDERSON: It's strictly up to the 8 organization. You know, in some cases, it may take 9 less time to do a debit cards transaction than writing 10 a check. 11 MS. TAYLOR: When this was originally 12 brought up, Larry, it was because of all the hot checks 13 the Jordan Division receives. If you take checks, you 14 get hot checks; there's no two ways around it. We 15 said, at least this way it comes straight out of their 16 account; you don't have a hot-check fee, which somebody 17 has to take care of; you don't have to go to the 18 general account fund to round the money back up; and 19 you don't know for two weeks that that's a hot check. 20 It takes a good two weeks from the time that you 21 receive the check for you to even know, so in the mean 22 time, they continue to write checks in your hall, and, 23 before you know it, you've got hundreds of dollars of 24 checks from the same person, and the account was 25 closed, and the rest. And the debit card gets rid of 0015 1 all of that. You know, you can get rid of checks with 2 the debit card. 3 MR. WHITTINGTON: Okay. That makes 4 sense. We don't take checks. 5 MS. TAYLOR: Because I've never set up a 6 debit card type of transaction, we've never done this, 7 so I don't know why some places do or don't have key 8 pads. 9 MR. SANDERSON: We can look into it. 10 There again, like I said, right now this is just being 11 presented to y'all. The recommendation that we would 12 have would be that it move forward to the Commission 13 for proposal, and we can look at -- in between that 14 time, if you vote today to do that, in the commission 15 meeting it would be heard at, we can do a little 16 research on Frost Bank or something like that. 17 MR. ATKINS: And I was going to say, it 18 might also be beneficial if -- Suzanne, you have 19 knowledge or, you know, you can get information from 20 Frost Bank that contradicts what -- 21 MS. TAYLOR: Yeah. I just know some 22 places have a key pad and I put it in and other places 23 make me sign like it's a credit card, but it always 24 comes right out of my checking account because I don't 25 have a credit card account with this number on it. I 0016 1 think the reason it says Visa on it is because then 2 people accept it. I don't know why, but that was my 3 only thought on that. Maybe they're cheaper if you 4 don't have a key pad; I don't know. 5 MR. SANDERSON: We'll look into that. 6 CHAIR BRACKETT: Charles Hutchins, would 7 you like to make a comment? 8 MR. HUTCHINS: Good morning. My name is 9 Charles Hutchins. I'm from Dallas. The one I have, 10 the copy I have, on the second page, line 28, it speaks 11 of the credit card function has to be disabled. Well, 12 in your ATM's, that function is available. Are we 13 saying that we're going to have to disable that 14 function in our ATM's in the bingo hall? 15 MR. SANDERSON: This rule only addresses 16 taking debit cards at the cashier's station. 17 MR. HUTCHINS: So it's strictly at the 18 cashier's station. It's not at the ATM? 19 MR. SANDERSON: It has nothing to do 20 with ATM or anything. If you have an ATM in your 21 building and they go over there to -- and they can use 22 credit cards, debit cards, whatever, in that ATM 23 because they're getting cash out of their account. 24 When it comes to the transaction of actually paying for 25 bingo paper and products, they're giving you a $20 bill 0017 1 instead of a credit card or a debit card. 2 MR. HUTCHINS: Okay. I just want to be 3 sure that that's not going to stretch out to all of us 4 having to disable functions in our ATM's. 5 MR. SANDERSON: No. This is strictly 6 just for at the point of sales station where the 7 transaction of purchasing a bingo product takes place. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: Stephen Fenoglio. 9 MR. FENOGLIO: Thank you, Madame Chair, 10 Committee Members. My name is Stephen Fenoglio, and I 11 represent over 950 charitable bingo organizations. I 12 have visited with staff with the following concerns and 13 they've pledged to work with us on that and I find 14 comfort in that. 15 My comments are on subparagraph C, D, 16 and E of the proposed rules, which are found on page 17 two, lines 23 to 30. It states, a credit card may not 18 be used to purchase or use bingo paper, bingo cards, 19 electronic bingo devices, or pulls, Subparagraph C. I 20 don't think that's what the law is today; although, 21 there are provisions in the Bingo Enabling Act that do 22 place restrictions on those. Under the Government Code 23 of Bingo Enabling Act 2001.451B, any bingo funds, other 24 than the funds from a debit cards, must be deposited 25 into the bingo account within 24 hours, so if I go to 0018 1 Larry's hall, and let's assume Larry's hall has a 2 credit card machine, and I purchase $40 worth of bingo 3 product, that transaction is, I believe, legal today 4 under a fair reading of the Bingo Enabling Act, but 5 Larry's charity must have those bingo funds into the 6 bingo account within 24 hours, otherwise he's in 7 violation of 2001.451B. Some credit card companies do 8 wire those funds instantaneously; others do not. 9 My point is, if a charity has a 10 relationship with a credit card account and can get 11 those funds into the bingo account within that 24-hour 12 period, this rule should allow that to occur. Now, 13 there's another caveat, and this is a caveat that this 14 use of debit card provision in House Bill 2519 also 15 recognizes, under Section 2001.458, you can only use 16 certain authorized -- you can only use bingo funds to 17 pay for certain authorized expenses. 18 If you'll notice in Subparagraph 11, a 19 debit card expense that the merchant charges the 20 charity is now an authorized expense. Under the Bingo 21 Enabling Act, if the merchant in Larry's hall's 22 situation charges, and it's usually a one to three 23 percent transaction fee, as you probably know, the 24 consumer never pays that; it's the merchant that 25 accepts the credit card as payment. In this case, it 0019 1 would be the charity that's conducting bingo at the 2 time. For purposes of this example, I'm calling it 3 Larry's hall. They would be charged between one and 4 three percent, typically, of my $40 purchase, and that 5 could be 40 cents. That 40 cents, Larry cannot use 6 bingo funds to pay for and the charity can't, and 7 that's clear. 8 And this rule, you know, continues, I 9 think, and that's probably why C is in there, but if 10 Larry has -- if the charity has other funds available 11 other than bingo to pay for that transaction, why would 12 the Commission want to prohibit that? And I think this 13 is an area we can work with staff on to draft that. I 14 don't want to be in a position where a charity either 15 intentionally or otherwise violates the deposit rule, 16 and I know that's a concern the staff has because I've 17 seen audits where charities have, on occasion, not 18 promptly deposited the funds as required under the 19 statute, and my comments are to try -- I'm not trying 20 to get around it. 21 I also have seen charities occasionally 22 use bingo funds for not-approved purposes in the Bingo 23 Enabling Act, and I'm not trying to get around this 24 issue, but it seems to me, if a charity has thought 25 this out and can use a credit card and can make money 0020 1 from accepting those credit cards even with the hurdles 2 I've addressed, shouldn't the Commission encourage that 3 type of transaction? Some merchants today, 80 to 4 90 percent of their revenues come in the form of credit 5 card. I am aware that some halls have explored and are 6 ready to put in credit cards but have been concerned 7 about some of these issues. 8 The next issue, and this is, again, in 9 the form of just an observation, under Subparagraph D, 10 debit cards may only be accepted as payment for the 11 sale of the bingo product. You could read that 12 logically to say you could not use a debit card to 13 purchase a dollar account item, and I know that's not 14 what y'all intended, and, so again, I think that's in 15 the comment -- the nature of a comment in the rule 16 making process. I would file that comment; the staff 17 would respond; the Commissioners would respond. That's 18 not our intent. I'm just raising the issue. 19 In Subparagraph E, the credit card key 20 function must be disabled before the PIN may be used 21 for a debit card transaction. In some merchants, and 22 Suzanne has eluded to this, the ATM is actually a part 23 of the cashiering system, and, so again, if I wanted to 24 use a credit card to purchase a dollar item, maybe a 25 food service item, and I'm using it at the cashier, the 0021 1 fact that they have to disable that is a huge problem 2 for the hall, and I don't think that's what y'all 3 intended to do with that. 4 MR. ATKINS: Let me make sure I 5 understand, Steve. I thought I heard you say that that 6 ATM is a part of the cashier station? 7 MR. FENOGLIO: It can be, and it is in 8 merchants today. The ATM is connected as a part of the 9 point of sale. When I go to a Randall's and buy 10 groceries and I present my ATM card to pay and I say I 11 want an extra $20 and at Randall's I punch in my unique 12 number, and so -- and I'm not saying today, Billy, that 13 charities will be there with an ATM as a part of the 14 cashier, but if they -- if a sophisticated bingo hall 15 wants to mimic a Randall's transaction, then eventually 16 it will be a part of that point of sale, yes. 17 MR. ATKINS: Okay. I guess I wasn't 18 aware that that was tied to an ATM. I mean, I have the 19 same option when I use my Pulse card to get additional 20 cash back, but I've never viewed it as getting it from 21 an ATM; I viewed it as getting it from HEB. 22 MR. FENOGLIO: But the whole transaction 23 is going through the ATM. You may have a big stand-up 24 ATM machine that we see in banks and, you know, 25 where -- and you'll see them in Randall's, too, they'll 0022 1 stand up, but a part of that is also connected to the 2 ATM in the back end, and, you know, I don't know if 3 this rule would allow that to happen. And, again, I'm 4 not suggesting today or in the next six months that the 5 charity will do that, but if it's a sophisticated 6 hall -- and there are some halls, as you know, Billy, 7 that you have under a different grandfather clause 8 where they can have several halls within a common 9 foundation basing, but not that many. There weren't 10 even, you know, multiple locations within the same big 11 box, if you will. 12 It's those type of locations where it 13 might be, you know, commercially reasonable to run that 14 ATM through the cashiering system in the point of sale. 15 You'll still have your accounting backup, but I 16 envision that that would happen, and perhaps fairly 17 rapidly, and I'd like for the rule to be flexible 18 enough that that could occur. And, again, I think 19 that's in the comment of Phil's earlier comment, let's 20 talk to some merchants and figure out the best way to 21 do this, and that's all I'm trying to get to is that, 22 when you and I envision this happening in six months 23 from now when the big ATM's come in, let's think a 24 little bit further down the road and think, well, they 25 may be like a Randall's, if you will. 0023 1 My final comment is just -- and it's a 2 comment I make all the time -- you've got a four-year 3 recordkeeping requirement, and I just want to observe 4 that every time there's a recordkeeping requirement, 5 there's a cost associated with maintaining those 6 records. I understand why the Commission wants the 7 four-year uniform rule on every recordkeeping 8 requirement, but I just observe that every time. 9 As the legislature -- when the 10 legislature passes a statutory provision that directs 11 this agency to do certain things, there's a cost 12 involved and y'all do a regulatory note and sometimes 13 the regulatory note is very minimal and other times in 14 the case of when we want to combine an opinion, which 15 was passed in House Bill 2519, that was a fairly -- it 16 cost a lawyer, as I recall. There was a lawyer or two 17 as a part of that cost. I think it was $50,000 to 18 $80,000. My only point on this is, there is a 19 regulatory cost involved with this. 20 Other than that, I'd be happy to answer 21 any questions. And I will be willing to work with the 22 staff. If the BAC desires to report this on, there 23 will be, I believe, time to sit down with the staff. 24 Assuming the BAC voted today to report it, you'd be 25 looking at March before -- I think the next Commission 0024 1 meeting is March 5, so I guess you're in late March or 2 April time frame. 3 Okay. I'll be happy to answer any 4 questions, and thank you, Madam Chair. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Does anyone have any 6 questions? Are you ready for the question? 7 The staff requests that the Bingo 8 Advisory Committee recommend to the Texas Lottery 9 Commission the proposed new Rule 16 TAC 402 debit cards 10 be published in the Texas Register for public comment. 11 Are you ready to vote on this? All 12 those in favor please say aye. 13 Is anyone opposed? 14 Item No. 5 is: Consideration of and 15 possible discussion and/or action on a new rule 16 relating to unit accounting. 17 MR. OLDHAM: Madame's Chair, again, my 18 name is Kevin Oldham. I'm assistant general counsel 19 for the Lottery Commission. You have in your notebooks 20 a draft of the Unit Accounting Rule. The last time 21 that you saw this rule, it was in several talking 22 points. It didn't take long to form that as rules 23 normally do. At the December 4th meeting, those 24 talking points were presented and there was a dialog 25 between members of the BAC and members of the industry 0025 1 and staff and several points were raised. 2 Specifically, it was noted that the rules should allow 3 a conductor/lessor, which is also a member of a unit, 4 to separate rental income from the gross receipts from 5 the unit. In addition, it was stated that the rule 6 should reflect the intended House Bill 2519 by reducing 7 the reporting requirements of licensees which make up a 8 unit. In addition, there was an issue on how unit 9 accounting might affect the taxes and the status of 10 certain charities and on how they pulled their 11 resources and actually acted as a unit. The working 12 group, including members of the BAC, met in January to 13 discuss some of these issues, and those are 14 encapsulated in the draft before you today. 15 We'd be happy to answer any questions 16 you have, if you want to take public comment on this. 17 MR. SANDERSON: I would also like to 18 note that Danny Moore and Larry Whittington were the 19 two BAC members that served on the subcommittee 20 meetings and I believe Steve Bresnen and Steve Fenoglio 21 were the other two public members. 22 CHAIR BRACKETT: Are there any questions 23 from the committee? 24 MR. DOUGHERTY: Madame Chairman, I was 25 not present at the last two meetings, for which I 0026 1 apologize, but I'm not quite sure what flash boards and 2 blowers are. Could you have someone just explain what 3 blowers are? 4 CHAIR BRACKETT: You play bingo; the 5 blowers are what makes the ball come up. 6 MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh. Thank you. And the 7 flash boards involve the bingo game? 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: Exactly. 9 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I'm glad you asked that 10 because I didn't know either. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: Does that cover that 12 issue? 13 MR. DOUGHERTY: Yes. 14 MR. MOORE: I just want to make a 15 comment on this. I think that we've hashed this thing 16 pretty good. The only thing that seems to be coming up 17 again is under G No. 1, that all distributions of net 18 proceeds of the unit shall be paid from the unit's 19 bingo account, the unit member's bank accounts. It 20 seems like that's a little redundant, but I understand 21 there may be a purpose otherwise, but the -- as it's 22 stated here in House Bill -- well, it was stated during 23 the last meeting about House Bill 2519, we were trying 24 to reduce the requirements of licensees and the number 25 of accounts that they -- the issue with regard to 0027 1 reporting requirements of licensees and the number of 2 accounts that charitable bingo operations division is 3 responsible for auditing. It actually seems like we've 4 created another account. 5 That's my comment on that. I know some 6 people have brought that up to me just recently. I 7 still feel like we need to move on with this rule at 8 this point, and I'd like to get comments also from the 9 group. 10 MR. WHITTINGTON: I have a comment on 11 this particular issue. I think within the bingo halls 12 that I represent, when it comes to unit accounting, 13 we'll be out dealing with the IRS issues and this and 14 that, if everybody has the same bank account that they 15 got now, I think it would make it a lot more easier for 16 every organization doing their taxes just like they've 17 been doing them for years as well as one particular 18 conductor that's the head of that unit disbursing the 19 net proceeds to each one of these charities that's on 20 that unit. It would make it a lot more easier. We 21 wouldn't have to deal with IRS problems because they 22 could do their taxes the same way because they're 23 getting the same setup that they -- basically what they 24 got now because it's just under their unit form now and 25 it goes into the Texas Lottery Commission the same way 0028 1 as the bingo, but on their unit separate. 2 MS. TAYLOR: I have one question about 3 it also. If the funds go into the bingo bank account 4 instead of a general account then that means the 5 Lottery Commission, if they went to audit the charity, 6 would only be auditing that bingo account since all 7 disbursements would be coming out of there. Does that 8 mean they wouldn't be looking at the general account of 9 the organization, instead they would just look at that 10 one bingo account? 11 MR. SANDERSON: If the proper and 12 adequate records are there for the distributions to 13 come out of the bingo account, for example, I guess, in 14 the rule for use of net proceeds that will be at the -- 15 it's on the agenda for the Commission meeting next 16 week, one of the requirements is that the distributions 17 be made out of the bingo bank account and, if it is to 18 the general account, that they have sufficient 19 documentation at the time of that transaction to 20 justify what that expense was for or what it was going 21 for, and, so yes, that is the case that I feel like, in 22 general, that if the bingo account is operated and 23 records are maintained adequately out of that, then 24 that is correct, we would not really be auditing the 25 general account. 0029 1 MS. TAYLOR: So, see, I mean, that -- to 2 me, it really makes good sense. If I was a charity, I 3 would have a separate account set up so I didn't have 4 to supply ledgers from my entire general account to 5 you. You would be limited to that one account and 6 here's your receipts, and it really sounds easier to 7 me. I mean, I know what you're thinking over there, 8 Steve, but it seems easier to me to go ahead and make 9 all of disbursements from that one little account 10 because that's all you're going to be using it for, to 11 disburse those funds in an approved manner, so I always 12 said I would never put it in my general account because 13 I wouldn't want to hassle with an auditor with my 14 entire general account and all my records. 15 MR. SANDERSON: And on another note with 16 that, additionally, because of 2519, revising the 17 definition of charitable purposes, that now includes, 18 you know, other activities that are consistent with 19 their exemption, that the organizations now are 20 involved, and if you have -- like I said at the last 21 BAC meeting, if you have organizations in a unit that 22 are of multiple 501C type designations, the money 23 coming out of that one unit bank account may not 24 necessarily qualify as a distribution for all 25 organizations as a part of the unit, and then, 0030 1 secondly, by the unit members keeping their bingo bank 2 account, it still gives them the signature authority 3 over the funds that come out of that for charitable 4 purposes, and that way, if there's any audit and there 5 is a distribution that's disallowed, then the use of 6 proceeds for charitable is disallowed and not 7 necessarily a bingo expense out of the unit account, 8 then you know who's responsible for putting the money 9 back in the accounts. 10 MS. TAYLOR: Well, you know, yeah, I 11 like this a lot better. The problem I had with the 12 last rule was when all the funds had to come from the 13 unit's accounting except for this certain exemplar 14 invitation. I thought that would be a real problem, 15 but this sounds just like -- to me, it would make it 16 really easy, so I really like this one a lot better. 17 And I like that I went from like nine pages to a page 18 and a half. 19 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. We have some 20 people that would like to ask some questions or make 21 comments. Sharon Ives. 22 MS. IVES: Madame Chair, I want to pass 23 at this time. Steve Fenoglio will be giving my report. 24 CHAIR BRACKETT: Stephen, are you ready? 25 MR. FENOGLIO: For the record, my name 0031 1 is Stephen Fenoglio. I was up here earlier. First, 2 thank you, Billy and Phil and Kevin and others for 3 working with the industry on this. We have come a long 4 way and we still have aways to go, and I agree with 5 you, Suzanne and Larry, that going from nine pages or 6 more down to a page and a half is a vast improvement. 7 The only comment that my clients have is the kind of 8 comment that Danny eluded to earlier, and that has to 9 do with the provision under mandatory, the charities 10 must maintain their bingo bank account, and I would 11 suggest the solution to that is made in two places in 12 subparagraph one, all distributions of the net proceeds 13 of the unit may be paid from the unit's bingo account 14 to the unit member organization's bank account. Each 15 unit member organization may then make its charitable 16 use of net proceeds from its bingo bank account. 17 And here's why: Not every charity is 18 the same; we all know that. This rule is a one size 19 fits all, and if that's the case, then everyone here 20 would be dressed like I am. I think I'm one of the 21 bigger members, so everyone would have to wear a 44 22 coat, and for Billy, I think it would be maybe a little 23 tight for him and certainly shorter for him because 24 he's taller, and it would engulf Patricia and Mario. 25 And here's the real issue, if you think about a small 0032 1 charity who this rule would comport with because they 2 get a limited amount of bingo funds, perhaps, and they 3 write five checks for their distribution and there 4 would be no real need for them to have a general fund 5 account, so this rule would fit them. Change the 6 scenario, though, to some of the charities that receive 7 bingo on I-35 at Braker Lane that Jack conducts, Family 8 Elder Care is a $3.5 million a year revenue charity, 9 and Virginia's charity in Lubbock is a sizable charity 10 as well, if you have to make the funds from the unit to 11 the bingo bank account, I know Family Elder Care 12 doesn't write 58 checks per month for the use of those 13 bingo funds and they wouldn't do that, and that's what 14 that -- but that's what that rule would require them 15 arguably to do. 16 What happens is, if it's a $2,000 or 17 $6,000 monthly check, it comes from the current bingo 18 account and goes into their general fund, and again, 19 the general fund in any one month is going to have 20 $300,000 or more running through it. Some of those 21 bingo proceeds are paid for the use for general 22 overhead; some of those funds may be used for staff 23 development; some of those funds may be used for 24 travel; and so, therefore, it doesn't make sense to 25 have it go from the unit bingo account to the charity 0033 1 bingo account to the general fund, and I would suggest 2 to you that you ought to give the charities the option. 3 Because the reality is, and the Lottery Commission has 4 audited the five charities at River City back in 2000, 5 and the way all of those operate, they're larger 6 charities, the staff had to look at their general fund 7 accounts. There's absolutely no way that that charity 8 is going to write 58 check to cover the 58 different 9 items that some of those bingo funds are covering. 10 Let's talk about the cost. And by the 11 way, some of the small charities may choose to take the 12 check from the bingo unit account and put it into their 13 general fund because they're always going to have a 14 general fund account. The way the rule is drafted now, 15 they must, though, have that intermediate staff. Most 16 of you, I'm sure, if you're involved with charities, 17 pay service charges for the maintenance of those 18 accounts, and the charities that I've seen, they run 19 between $10 and $30 a month. If you'll assume for the 20 sake of argument that 200 of the halls moved to a unit 21 when all these issues are flushed out, you've typically 22 got five charities up to seven charities per year, 23 let's assume it's five charities, and they're each 24 paying $12 a month in service charge, that's $120,000 a 25 year that they would have to maintain all of those 0034 1 bingo accounts. Those funds are not funds that can be 2 used for charitable purposes. 3 And by the way, those funds that they 4 have to pay to maintain that account, they cannot use 5 bingo funds to pay for that expense. That's $120,000 a 6 year in the hypothetical. It may be higher; it may be 7 lower, but it's a substantial chunk of change, and I 8 can foresee a number of charities wanting to eliminate 9 their existing bingo account when they go into a unit. 10 I recognize from the staff's position that it may be 11 easier, and probably will in certain instances, to have 12 to have that bingo account, the charities unique bingo 13 account, to audit, but this kind of goes back to, if 14 you're going to have regulations, you're going to have 15 costs and not everything is easy or free in life. 16 And, again, for the River City 17 Charities, the staff is always going to have to audit. 18 If they want to know what those bingo proceeds were 19 used for, they're going to have to look at that general 20 fund account; there's just no two ways about it. And I 21 would suggest to you that a lot of charities, not just 22 the big charities, are going to be in that same boat 23 because they're going to put that general fund or that 24 bingo fund money from the unit account to the bingo 25 account to the general fund account, and they 0035 1 understand they've got to prove up to the Lottery 2 Commission that those funds were used for charitable 3 purposes. 4 A long story short, we've come a long 5 way thanks to the staff in large part for that. I 6 would suggest make it voluntary or make it where they 7 can either choose to maintain that general account or 8 not, and let each charity make their own decision. 9 I'd be happy to answer any questions. 10 MR. WHITTINGTON: Steve, you were 11 talking about the cost of the bank account. Don't they 12 pay for the bank account now? It's the same cost. 13 Right? 14 MR. FENOGLIO: They do, yes. 15 MR. WHITTINGTON: It's going to be the 16 same cost in the future. Right? 17 MR. FENOGLIO: If they choose to 18 maintain the account, but, Larry, if they choose not 19 to, then they've saved -- you know, if it's one 20 charity, they've saved $12 a month, that's $144 a year. 21 Now, $144 a year may not be a lot of money, but when 22 you take it statewide, it could add up to a significant 23 chunk of change. 24 MR. WHITTINGTON: Okay. I understand 25 that. And you said you wanted to add "may." 0036 1 MR. FENOGLIO: Yes. 2 MR. WHITTINGTON: Okay. "May" would 3 have to be defined, I'm sure, somewhere in some 4 paragraph or something. We need to define "may." 5 MR. FENOGLIO: No. I think you could 6 look at just the Websters definition of "may," which is 7 shall. 8 MR. WHITTINGTON: I'm talking about in 9 this rule because we're talking about two different 10 things now. Charities "may" do something different. 11 Do you think that needs to be added what they may do or 12 what they can do.? 13 MR. FENOGLIO: No. I think the word 14 right now is "shall." You don't have to define what 15 "shall" means. I think if you use the word, "may" be 16 paid from the unit's bingo account, then that's 17 satisfactory to say, it could be paid from the unit's 18 bingo account or not. 19 MR. PAVLOVSKY: "May" gives you on 20 option; "shall" does not. 21 MR. WHITTINGTON: I understand that. 22 I'm talking about "shall" is one; "may" is the option. 23 MR. FENOGLIO: Yes. 24 MR. WHITTINGTON: Okay. 25 MR. FENOGLIO: And then just one final 0037 1 observation under H-2, and I think this is the case and 2 I would file a comment to make sure in the rule making 3 under the category of full disclosure, I think what 4 this is trying to say is, if a charity coming into a 5 unit who is in default, as long as that charity is in 6 default, then the unit itself is in default. I don't 7 think, once the -- and that's what that's intended to 8 address. Because the unit, if it maintains its 9 accounts and pays promptly, you're not suggesting 10 anything else by that. 11 MR. SANDERSON: I think the question 12 that I'm hearing is that -- or, the intent that we 13 looked at in this section here was, if you have five 14 organizations at a location and one of those 15 organizations was on the delinquent purchaser list 16 indicating that they were in default to a distributor 17 that once they formed that unit, that would cause the 18 unit to be on the delinquent purchaser list. Once that 19 organization clears up their account and are no longer 20 delinquent, then the unit would come off the list, so 21 to speak. 22 MR. FENOGLIO: And likewise, then, if 23 the unit then became delinquent, then the unit would be 24 on the list. 25 CHAIR BRACKETT: Are there any questions 0038 1 of Steve while he's close by? If not, Charles 2 Hutchins, do you have comments on this item? 3 MR. HUTCHINS: Madame Chair, Steve 4 Fenoglio covered them adequately. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Thank you. 6 MS. GREENFIELD: May I make a comment? 7 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yes. 8 MS. GREENFIELD: I just want to make a 9 comment that I like the way it reads with going into -- 10 from the unit accounting into the bingo bank account. 11 I understand, Steve. I like options; I like for the 12 charities to have options, so I think that having this 13 "shall" changed to "may" is good. And most of the 14 charities that I work with they get their fees waived 15 at the bank just for being a 501C, so you might look 16 into that. 17 MR. FENOGLIO: Some banks will; some 18 banks won't. 19 MS. GREENFIELD: Thank you. That's my 20 comment. 21 MR. WHITTINGTON: I'll second that 22 comment. 23 CHAIR BRACKETT: So what we're going to 24 be considering is approving is changing the word 25 "shall" to "May?" 0039 1 MR. MANIO: In our last meeting, there 2 was a question that was brought up relating to the IRS 3 and how we portrayed the unit if it was formed. Has 4 there been any clarification on that or... 5 MR. SANDERSON: As far as the formation 6 of the unit, there has not really been any additional 7 information from the IRS that we've attained. What 8 we've looked at in this unit accounting rule is trying 9 to keep organizations -- you know, we didn't want to 10 put something in this rule that might jeopardize their 11 exempt status, and so we have done that through this 12 rule in itself. That's not to say that, if you -- you 13 know, hopefully, if you follow everything that's in 14 here that you won't have some other area that might 15 cause you to be in trouble with the IRS, but we've 16 looked at it and we've talked to them. Now, the 17 formation of the unit in and of itself is something 18 more that's going to be a little bit more different 19 when you're talking about attaining the DIN numbers, 20 payroll taxes, and, you know, those other areas, and 21 that is not addressed in this rule. 22 MR. OLDHAM: I would just point 23 everyone's attention to Subsection A of the rule, and 24 it basically sets out that the rule itself, you know, 25 has no applicability to any IRS regulation whatsoever, 0040 1 so each organization, in whatever activity they 2 undertook, would have to make sure on their own that 3 they comply with IRS standards and regulations. 4 Nothing in the rule can either be construed as a waiver 5 or a grant under IRS tax regulations. 6 I think that goes to what you're talking 7 about, Mario. Am I correct? 8 MR. MANIO: Yes, that's -- but the real 9 question at the time was -- or, the stumbling block 10 right now, some charities are reluctant to go ino the 11 unit accounting because of the risk that the IRS might 12 come out with a different ruling on how the unit will 13 be treated. 14 MR. OLDHAM: I don't think that the 15 Commission could make a statement, you know, based on 16 the fact that if you do this, you're okay under IRS 17 regulations. But I understand, at the last BAC 18 meeting, at least in the transcript, it was indicated 19 that some folks may be in the industry for seeking a 20 letter ruling from the IRS, and maybe that could be a 21 guideline that the licensees can go by. 22 Steve, walked out, but I thought that he 23 was the one in the December 4th meeting who brought 24 that up. I don't know if it was him that was seeking 25 the letter ruling. It may have been someone else. We 0041 1 can go back and look at the transcript and find out who 2 was seeking that. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: He can answer your 4 question now, he's returned. 5 MR. FENOGLIO: I'm sorry. I stepped 6 out. I didn't hear the question. 7 MR. MANIO: Steve, the question was 8 dealing with the letter ruling that was discussed at 9 the -- or, a request for a letter ruling that was 10 discussed at the last BAC meeting. 11 MR. FENOGLIO: Yes. Well, any charity 12 can request one. The filing fee with the IRS is about 13 $25,00. Under our IRS law, in practice, whoever asks 14 for it, it's only binding and then official to that 15 organization, so it's -- and so, number one, if one 16 organization gets one it is not -- the IRS will not 17 view that as binding or as precedent for a different 18 group. 19 The status is, we're still working on 20 it, for the request. And there are, in my view, a 21 number of federal tax issues involved with unit 22 accounting including unemployment tax, worker's comp, 23 federal and state withholding issues, and depending 24 upon what the IRS says once the letter ruling is -- and 25 assuming that we ask all of the right questions and get 0042 1 the right answers we want, then I think other charities 2 would at least have a safe harbor amount, Mario, if the 3 same set of facts that's laid out in this lengthy 4 request, which will probably be 20 pages or more. 5 If those set of facts apply to the 6 charities that -- the hall that you have an interest 7 in, then I think you would have somewhat of a safe 8 harbor, quote/unquote, to know that if you have the 9 same set of facts and do the same sort of things that 10 the result would be, if the IRS comes looking, that 11 you're the charitable organizations that conduct at 12 your hall. The problem, though, is under the 13 revenue -- the way the revenue ruling works is, if the 14 IRS later takes a different position, they'll only tell 15 the organizations that requested it and you might never 16 know that, in fact, they changed their position and 17 changed a crucial fact decision that affects how that 18 organization does its business. 19 Now, if that were the case, then the IRS 20 would allow those charities that asked for the advisory 21 or a private letter ruling a reasonable time to change 22 their practice, but that's the other downside of this 23 is that, if you've done it, then it's only binding on 24 those organizations and it's a laborious process to get 25 all of the questions asked correctly. 0043 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: And David Hinely, do 2 you have a question? 3 MR. HINLEY: David Hinely, Jetta 4 Services, and I represent 33 different charities. 5 We're very involved and interested in this unit 6 accounting, and I don't want to overlap what Steve may 7 have already covered, and I apologize for being late. 8 I had to get my grandkids to school this morning. Just 9 so I don't -- he may have already got this one 10 answered, so I will move on to the next one if he has. 11 I did not understand the thinking and the reasoning of 12 why the charities in a unit would be required to have a 13 separate -- and maintain -- continuously maintain their 14 current bingo bank account. Has that already been 15 answered? 16 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yes. 17 MR. HINLEY: Okay. I'll ask 18 Mr. Fenoglio. 19 Concerning the private letter ruling, 20 one would be wise to go that route if they wanted to 21 get into this. We've been trying to answer -- 22 establish all the questions for private letter ruling, 23 and we -- as Mr. Fenoglio said, it's a very lengthy 24 process and a very lengthy document. We thought we had 25 it ready to submit and then discovered something else 0044 1 came up, and so we're still not ready to submit that. 2 I guess, really, the main thing I was 3 interested in is the bingo bank account. I just 4 absolutely do not understand why they would be required 5 to maintain a bingo bank account, so I'll get that 6 answer. And we'll be glad to share with you any 7 information we get on this private letter ruling, but 8 as Steve has pointed out, that will only apply to the 9 unit requesting that ruling, and it is a very expensive 10 process. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: Let me ask you a 12 question. You're saying that you have asked for a 13 private ruling? 14 MR. HINLEY: No, we have not. We've 15 been in contact with the IRS. We have been putting it 16 together and we've tried to think of all the things 17 that we needed to cover to be sure that we're -- when 18 we've got it done, we'll be perfect, and we're very 19 optimistic as to how we've styled this that we will get 20 a favorable ruling. We think we can submit it today 21 and get a favorable ruling, but we're not sure we've 22 asked all of the questions yet, so we're just trying to 23 be sure that we've asked all of those questions. 24 We've even changed the type of 501C 25 charity that we're using as our trustee to be able to 0045 1 answer a different kind of a question, which has to do 2 with the unit tax, so we want to be sure that we're 3 getting an answer for that, also. What were trying to 4 do is style one that will apply to several of our bingo 5 halls that we would be able to rely upon that for 6 different circumstances, so we're trying to see what 7 all the circumstances might be and get all of them 8 covered in this one letter since it's such an expensive 9 process. 10 CHAIR BRACKETT: And you will share that 11 information? 12 MR. HINLEY: Yes, when it's available. 13 You know, we've looked -- you know, you can go on the 14 Internet and you can search for all of those records 15 for the history and there is nothing like this ever 16 been done. We found one thing that's similar, but it 17 doesn't even approach. Out of all the records of 18 private letter rulings, there's nothing that's been 19 submitted like this. We're breaking new ground. That 20 happens all the time. 21 Any questions? 22 CHAIR BRACKETT: Anyone have been any 23 questions of David? 24 MR. HINLEY: It's a complex process and 25 one needs to enter into it with their eyes open and be 0046 1 very careful to be sure that you're covered all the 2 bases before you get into it. It's not that easy to 3 get into it, but the benefits, I think, outweigh the 4 getting started. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Thank you. I think 6 we've heard from everyone who said they wanted to speak 7 and had questions. Are you ready for the question on 8 this issue? 9 The staff requests that the Bingo 10 Advisory Committee recommend to the Texas Lottery 11 Commission that a proposed new rule 16402 unit 12 accounting be published in the Texas Registry for 13 public comment. 14 MR. WHITTINGTON: And change the word 15 should in that. 16 MR. SANDERSON: You can go ahead and 17 take the vote, but one of the things that I will say is 18 that the staff has, you know, we've looked at it and, 19 you know, there's another -- still a requirement in the 20 act that an organization maintain a bingo account. 21 And, like I said, we'll be glad to look at it and see 22 if there's any way to make that change from "shall" to 23 "may." It may be that we keep "shall" in there, and if 24 you vote here to move forward with it, that we present 25 to the commission that, you know, there's that one 0047 1 discrepancy that, you know, the staff has and the BAC 2 wanted to change it to "may," and then we can address 3 anything through public comment after that point. 4 CHAIR BRACKETT: Is that all right? 5 MR. MOORE: That's all right. 6 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any other questions? 7 Is there a second comment? All in favor, please say 8 aye. Anyone opposed? Thank you. 9 Let's take a very short break so that 10 our court reporter can have a break. Let come back in 11 ten minutes, which would be 11:15. 12 (A short break was taken.) 13 CHAIR BRACKETT: All right. We'll call 14 back to order now. 15 We are on Item No. 6 on the agenda, 16 which is: Report and possible discussion on status of 17 rule making projects. 18 And I'm going to ask for the assistance 19 of Billy Atkins on this item. 20 MR. ATKINS: Madame Chair, in terms of 21 the rules that, I guess, are currently pending, there 22 are the two rules that you've already taken action on 23 today, the unit accounting and the debit cards, which 24 will now move forward to the commission. There are two 25 rules scheduled for the commission meeting on March 0048 1 5th, which is previously considered, and that is the 2 use of proceeds and the unit manager rule. 3 Additionally, there are, I believe, two other rules 4 that the BAC has already taken action on relating to 5 temporary licenses and the notification of change to a 6 license, those are still in legal being drafted and 7 will be presented at a future commission meeting, if 8 not the March meeting. And that is essentially what 9 the staff is aware of that would be involved in 10 relating to the implementation of House Bill 2519. 11 There are three existing rules that we 12 believe require minor amendments in order to come into 13 compliance or to make them consistent with House Bill 14 2519. For example, House Bill 402580 relating to bingo 15 reports, that needs to be amended to reference the due 16 date of the 25th versus the 15th, so there are 17 amendments like that. That's currently what's pending 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Do you have any 19 questions today on these items of what's pending or 20 anything that's pending? 21 Then we'll move on to Item No. 7, which 22 is: Report and possible discussion on calendar year 23 2003 4th quarter and/or calendar year 2003 bingo 24 financial information and statistics. 25 And Terry Shankle will be working with 0049 1 us on this. 2 MR. ATKINS: And, members, Terri is 3 available to answer any specific questions you have 4 about any of the spreadsheets that you may have in your 5 notebook. As you can tell, 2003 was a very different 6 year from years in the past, in that, we saw the first 7 increase in total gross receipts in charitable bingo 8 since I believe 1995 with the exception of a slight 9 increase that occurred in the '97, '98 period, but 10 overall total gross receipts are up almost three 11 percent, of course, the biggest increase in gross 12 receipts are a result of pull tabs, which increased 13 almost $40 million in 2003 over 2002, and pull tab 14 sales at nearly $129 million are the highest that 15 they've been since 1995, and, of course, we attribute 16 that increase to the changes made in the pull tab rule 17 in the late 19 -- in late 2002 that allowed for a 18 greater variety in the pull tab tickets allowed. There 19 was an increase in the total amount of prizes awarded 20 in 2003. Again, we think that is driven by the pull 21 tab sales. That increased was almost $17 million. 22 Charitable distributions decreased approximately 23 $2.1 million. Expenses increased around $750,000, 24 while total attendance also decreased by almost $1 25 million. 0050 1 As I said, if you have any specific 2 questions, Terry will be happy to try and answer those 3 for you. 4 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Terry, if I could, on 5 the very top of the page under sales, regular, 6 electronic, instant. Is instant pull tabs? 7 MS. SHANKLE: Yes, sir, it is. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: No other questions? 9 MR. WHITTINGTON: We've got to get the 10 attendance up to really get the main thing up, which is 11 the proceeds that are going into the charities, and 12 that's -- the only way that is going to come through is 13 different forms of advertising, and that's one of the 14 focuses we have to definitely focus on next year and 15 this year. 16 MS. TAYLOR: Do you have any thoughts as 17 to why we have a decrease in the gross and a decrease 18 in the distribution? 19 MR. SANDERSON: I can answer that. Bill 20 Sanderson, charitable bingo assistant director. The 21 primary reason is because whenever -- one, the pull tab 22 sales did increase, but also prizes increased, which 23 leaves you with a lower net than previous. The pull 24 tabs, the event tickets that have been authorized that 25 are being used, the payouts on those are for a lot 0051 1 higher percentage than the previous versions of pull 2 tabs. When they had just the regular pull tabs, the 3 payout percentage was around 68 to 72 percent, and most 4 of these event tickets are paying out around 5 80 percent, so it's going to cost less money. Even 6 those sales are going up, the prizes are going up at a 7 little bit faster rate, so you got less the net. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any other comments or 9 questions? Okay. Thank you. 10 That brings us to Item No. 8 on the 11 agenda, which is: Report and possible discussion on 12 the survey of bingo players. 13 I would just like to make a comment 14 first and to thank Jack for getting this ball rolling 15 and the work that you did on it. And I want to 16 comment, too, that when I got the results, I was so 17 shocked to find out I am a typical bingo player. I'm a 18 64-year-old white female. 19 MR. DOUGHERTY: You look very different 20 and we love you for it. 21 Do you want me to sort of start this 22 ball rolling for you? 23 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yes, sir. 24 MR. DOUGHERTY: Well, I want to say that 25 I certainly appreciate the staff's work on processing 0052 1 over 3,000 survey reports. They were all different 2 and, yet, they provided a great insight of the 3 demographics of the bingo players. Previously, we 4 didn't have anything like that, and so the board has 5 done a great job, and the results are really surprising 6 and, yet, may be understandable at the same time. We 7 all know that a lot of women play bingo. 8 Now, my effort is to go to the next 9 level, and that is to do something to get all these 10 married 65-year-old beautiful women into the bingo 11 halls. Now, there's a lot of them out there that don't 12 play bingo and they're not the only ones. The younger 13 people are playing more bingo. The times are such that 14 people want some diversification, so we've got to get 15 them in there, and there's two ways we can do that. 16 The first way is to advertise. That's a 17 bad word, I know, because advertising is expensive, and 18 I don't think the bingo parlors and I don't think the 19 Lottery Commission has done a whole lot towards putting 20 a lot of money into advertising, but I think, as a 21 start, we could encourage billboard advertising as a 22 very reasonable cost effective way to advertise. We 23 can get a few strategic in-place billboards out there 24 that would get the word bingo to people's attention. 25 Media, newspaper, all those other type of 0053 1 communications are very expensive, and how affective 2 they are, I don't know. Television may be very 3 affective, but very expensive. 4 The second point of promotion is going 5 to be money, and the prizes that we're offering people 6 in the State of Texas are very small; they're limited 7 by the legislation. So that's something we as a 8 committee and Pete and I, who is on my committee, want 9 to work and to work up another survey to find out just 10 what it's going the take to get people to admit that 11 they will come and play bingo if we can get the prizes 12 high enough. 13 Now, that's my goal. Now, whether we 14 can do that by the next legislature, I don't know, but 15 I do think that we need to prepare another survey and 16 get down to this particular nitty-gritty question, what 17 will you do to -- what will get you to the bingo halls, 18 knowing that there's $20,000 $30,000, $40,000 prizes 19 out there, and a little advertisement to go with it. 20 So that, in summary, is where I'm coming 21 from. Pete and I are willing to hear anything that we 22 can to work on this survey. 23 MS. MORRIS: I have a comment here. My 24 name is Diane Morris. I'm the assistant general 25 counsel. You know, I really didn't want to interrupt 0054 1 you too much, but your survey is not about advertising 2 or promotion, and I would really remind you all before 3 you invite more discussion. It may be that a future 4 agenda item is about additional surveys, and then you 5 can really talk about if you want to do surveys on 6 advertising or promotions. That's not what this survey 7 was about, and with all respect, I sat very quietly. I 8 was hopping you would come back more and more to this 9 very agenda item, but, sir, I'm going to have to cut 10 off the rest of your -- from basically trying to engage 11 with you on how better advertising could occur or 12 better promotions could occur, because that was not 13 this survey. 14 MR. DOUGHERTY: I realize that. 15 MS. MORRIS: The survey was, who is 16 playing bingo. Regardless of who else you would like 17 to be playing, this was only, as I understood it, and 18 you weigh in, but this was only about who was playing 19 bingo, so I'm cutting you off. I'm sorry. 20 MR. DOUGHERTY: Well, you have no 21 objection to a second survey, though? 22 MS. MORRIS: I think that would be an 23 additional agenda item. This agenda was about this 24 survey. Put it on your agenda item. Somebody may have 25 other additional ideas that this survey itself brings 0055 1 other concepts to mind, but, certainly, this agenda 2 item is not about proposing and forming new surveys and 3 going out and asking for new surveys to be done, so, 4 yes, sir, I do have an objection to that continuation 5 of the discussion. 6 There's room for you to ask the Chair to 7 have an additional agenda item put on that agenda, we 8 want to come ready for further ideas for different 9 surveys. And you may have nine other surveys even 10 suggested to you, and that would be on the agenda item. 11 MR. DOUGHERTY: I have no objection to 12 that. I knew we weren't going to do it today. I 13 certainly wanted to get that ball rolling. 14 MR. ATKINS: I think, Diane, it would be 15 appropriate under Item No. 11. 16 MS. MORRIS: Yeah, you're right, the 17 additional items. That is correct. It is correct 18 under that as well. What additional items would you 19 like on your agenda so that the notice can be given so 20 other people can come forward on the survey ideas. 21 MS. TAYLOR: I do have one question 22 about the survey. Did you do a percentage of how many 23 surveys you received back and how many were completed? 24 I just feel like the number, I mean personally looking 25 at these, that it's skewed from my hall because I think 0056 1 there's a lot more Hispanics playing bingo in my hall, 2 and so when I see this, I think how many -- I would 3 like to know how many people -- I think -- I don't even 4 know how to say this. I just think that there's a lot 5 of Hispanic older women that didn't complete the form, 6 whether they couldn't read the form or didn't want to 7 take the time to do the form or that it just wasn't 8 something that they wanted to do. 9 MS. JAMBOR: And that could be correct. 10 My name is Liz Jambor. I'm the marketing research 11 manager for the Texas lottery. And that could be 12 correct, and that's one of the things that I've made 13 note on this presentation and on the variations of the 14 studies that have been published, is that this is based 15 on self-report data, so everything -- it's -- we're 16 not -- we're not trying to prove that the sun rises in 17 the east and sets in the west. It's more directional, 18 and, so yes, for your halls, it may be slightly 19 different, but on a statewide basis, it looks like what 20 we're presenting here. 21 What I hope that people in the bingo 22 area take away from this are some of the findings that 23 are not the average player or are not what the average 24 person is doing. Because when we get to the end of the 25 presentation, there are a couple of points that, in my 0057 1 opinion, I think are very important as far as the 2 number of days people play and the amount of money 3 they're spending and the reasons that they're playing. 4 Billy was very eloquent in saying, no, you're kidding 5 me, when I said this is the average player, but I think 6 it's the non-average player that's going to bring the 7 money into bingo. You've got your market set for your 8 average. It's now going after that non-average player, 9 and I'm hoping that this presentation and this study 10 talks about those people. 11 Now, prior to doing any future studies, 12 we have to go back to this one and figure out what 13 worked and what didn't, so that the next round, should 14 there be a next round, accounts for any problems in 15 data collection. 16 MR. ATKINS: And this is just a very 17 broad overview of the entire survey that Liz has put 18 together. The entire survey is available on the web 19 site and includes a lot more detailed information that 20 organizations can use if they want to try and attract 21 that, I think as called it, that nontraditional player. 22 CHAIR BRACKETT: You can print it down 23 if you have enough paper. And the color is beautiful. 24 MS. JAMBOR: I'd also like to say, and I 25 think it's an attribute to -- or, a compliment to the 0058 1 bingo areas, that information from the study has also 2 been presented in the Bingo Bulletin, the Bingo and 3 Lottery sites, so it's nice that this information is 4 getting out. We also are in discussion with Bingo 5 Manager to get this study published there, so it will 6 get beyond this room and anybody who happens to go to 7 the web site. 8 Okay. Today we're going to present the 9 Texas charitable bingo player's survey, demographics, 10 and participation for 2003. The survey was developed, 11 as we have shared, in cooperation with Charitable 12 Bingo, Lottery Marketing Research, and the Bingo 13 Advisory Committee. The questions focussed on 14 demographics and reasons for playing bingo. Since 15 nothing of this nature has been done before, it was the 16 starting point, as we've discussed in the past. We had 17 over 13,000 surveys distributed throughout Texas 18 between May and June of 2003 with over 3100 being 19 returned with useful data, and from a statistical 20 standpoint, this is a significant return. 21 The return surveys represented the 22 classes and regions on a weighted basis for equitable 23 comparisons across the state. We have five regions 24 within the state. There are ten licensed classes that 25 we reduced down to three. Ten licensed classes that we 0059 1 reduced down to three for easier data manipulation, but 2 those classes were still identified by gross receipts, 3 and the reason that we did that is knowing that some 4 regions have heavier play, some classes have heavier 5 play, so we wanted to make sure that we accounted for 6 those differences. 7 And as I said before, the data is based 8 on self-report data provided by the bingo players 9 willing to complete the survey, and so this information 10 is for directional use only, but it does provide a 11 benchmark of the first study completed on Texas 12 Charitable players. 13 Now, as Virginia eloquently put, the 14 average player is female, Caucasian, married, over 65 15 years of age, has a minimum of a high school education, 16 is employed, and has an annual income of $10,000 to 17 $25,000 a year. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: There's only one thing 19 on there I'm not, and that's married. 20 MS. JAMBOR: Now, I do want you to keep 21 this player in mind as we get towards the end of the 22 presentation when we talk about the non-average player. 23 Who is playing bingo? All of the 24 classes and regions were similar in description for the 25 average player, with the exception of region four, 0060 1 which is San Antonio. This region had a greater 2 Hispanic representation in the data provided than the 3 other regions. 4 MR. ATKINS: I was just going to say, so 5 I think that addresses your question, Suzanne, that 6 there were more reported Hispanic players in your area. 7 MS. JAMBOR: When we compare what we 8 know about Charitable Bingo Players now to state 9 demographics, we see that Charitable Bingo players are 10 slightly older than the general state population, it 11 skewed more females than the general population, 12 marital status is similar. There's also a greater 13 percentage of nonemployed individuals, and I usually 14 use the term nonemployed in deference to homemakers out 15 there. I do understand that they are very employed, 16 but as far as from a demographic measurement. But the 17 nice thing is that the two groups were similar as in 18 not currently employed. There was a slightly lower 19 average income compared to the statewide median income. 20 The ethnic makeup is fairly similar to the statewide 21 composition. There were slightly fewer percentages of 22 college graduates and beyond from the statewide 23 representation. 24 So now we want to look at what are these 25 average players participating in. The average player 0061 1 favors paper followed by pull tabs as a preferred bingo 2 product or activity. And this graph here shows the 3 different activities that occur at bingo halls from the 4 most favored on the left down to the least favored on 5 the right, and so we have paper, pull tabs, and 6 hand-helds as the top group. The average bingo player 7 also typically plays on Fridays and Sundays. Now, 8 there is play seven days a week, but these are the days 9 of the highest participation for the average player. 10 Now, you can see here, we have play for seven days a 11 week. Our greatest percentage is one or two days per 12 week. The average player spends an average of $101 per 13 week, and, again, breaking the amount spent per week 14 from less than $10 to $500 and over, you can see how 15 those different groups break out. 16 Then we wanted to know why did people 17 play Charitable Bingo. We asked -- we gave a list of 18 different reasons why someone might play bingo, and the 19 top five reasons in order are, for entertainment; for 20 the enjoyment of playing bingo; for the chance to win 21 something; to socialize with friends; and to support 22 worthy causes, so it's nice to see that, in the area of 23 charitable bingo, people do acknowledge supporting 24 worthy causes as a reason for playing. 25 There were, though, between some groups 0062 1 some differences in their top reasons to play bingo. 2 Support worthy causes was not noted in the top five 3 reasons by persons under 30 years of age; those that 4 reported themselves as single or other as far as 5 marital status; persons with annual incomes of less 6 $10,000, $25 to $40,000, or over $60,000 a year; less 7 than a high school education; playing bingo five to six 8 days per week; or spending between $100 and $199 per 9 week. So these groups were ones that did note support 10 worthy causes as a reason to play bingo. 11 Like what I can win, which was not in 12 the top five for the average player, but did end up in 13 the top five for these groups, players under 50 years 14 of age; those reporting single and other as marital 15 status; those that were self-employed, students, or not 16 currently employed; those with annual incomes of less 17 than $10,000, $25,000 to $40,000, and over $60,000; 18 those with less than a high school education or post 19 grad school education; those playing five to six days 20 per week; and those spending more than $100 per week. 21 So you've got two significant groups here, one that is 22 noting support worthy causes and one that is noting 23 like what I can win. 24 The other differences noted in the top 25 reasons to play bingo, players 18 to 21 years of age 0063 1 were the only group to note socialize with family as a 2 top reason for playing bingo, and players participating 3 in bingo seven days per week were the only group to 4 note a distraction as a top reason for playing bingo. 5 There were also differences within and among the 6 specifical demographic groups. For example, males were 7 more likely to be single and average age varied among 8 employment groups. The most notable distinction 9 existed within the participation and spending groups. 10 And this is the point that I think is the strongest 11 part of this bit of information we got from these 12 players, those players would higher participation 13 rates, those playing more days a week, not the average 14 two days, but for players playing the five, six, seven 15 days a week, reported higher levels of education. 16 Those players with a higher average weekly spending 17 reported higher amounts of education, and those players 18 with higher average weekly spending reported higher 19 levels of income, and so what you've got are groups of 20 players who have the money that are willing to spend 21 the money playing bingo. 22 So, in conclusion, on our first 23 preliminary benchmark survey of charitable bingo 24 players, we see that players come with two mindsets, 25 but they might not necessarily be mutually exclusive. 0064 1 We have players that report that they want to win 2 something as well as support Texas charities while 3 playing bingo. Which group to attract and how best to 4 do that will be the challenge of the bingo halls and 5 can be questioned in future studies. So knowing -- if 6 you're looking at your specific hall and you know, 7 looking out among the players, that you've got the 8 average group, yet, you know that that non-average 9 player exists in your area, what can you do to attract 10 them? What is it that they're wanting? Is it more 11 socialization or the understanding that bingo is a 12 place for socialization? Is it the understanding of 13 what bingo does support? Is it the understanding of 14 what they're able to win while playing bingo? 15 And, again, knowing that we're not going 16 to discuss this topic, but from a research standpoint, 17 any time you answer a question, you always have more to 18 come about, and so in future discussions, we can look 19 at this as a benchmark study of who the typical player 20 is and why they play. Future studies may answer the 21 questions about the atypical or the non-average player. 22 They may answer questions about other attractions about 23 bingo not included on this current study, and future 24 studies will allow us to learn more about the players 25 of charitable bingo in Texas. 0065 1 If you have any questions, I'll be happy 2 to answer them. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: Does anyone have any 4 questions? 5 MR. DOUGHERTY: Madame Chairman, back on 6 page six where it shows a pie chart of the number of 7 days per week playing bingo, what's interesting, if you 8 add up the high count, which was six or seven days a 9 week which added 18 percent, it means that 72 percent 10 of our players play all week compared to one-day 11 players, and I think that's significant too. One-day 12 players don't really add a whole lot to the whole pot, 13 but a lot of players play a week, seven days. A lot of 14 halls don't offer seven days, so, really, six days is 15 very common, and I think that's significant. 16 MS. TAYLOR: One other thing I noticed 17 during the discussion was that the players that played 18 the most and spent the most money were the players that 19 wanted the bigger prizes. 20 MR. DOUGHERTY: Absolutely. We need to 21 work on that. And there level of education because up 22 there, it's not like it's just poor little people that 23 are trying to make money; it's people with some 24 education and have some money to go out and play for 25 several reasons, they like to win something and they 0066 1 also like to socialize. 2 If I may continue, I have sort of an ace 3 in the whole to present to this group, something that 4 hasn't been discussed, and I think it's very 5 significant. I read somewhere -- and this is 6 unofficial, I think it was in the Bingo Bulletin a year 7 or so ago -- that bingo is a life-extending occupation. 8 And the study found that people that played bingo 9 rather regularly, at least four or five times a week, 10 lived 15 percent longer than these other ones did, and 11 there's many reasons for that. The stimulation of mind 12 to do mathematical interpretations of bingo numbers, 13 you've got to be fast; it keeps your mind accurate. 14 It also physically gets people out 15 there, usually the older people to get up and get out 16 and do something which they may not do otherwise. 17 There's a lot of motivation there to get out and do it. 18 And the socializing, of course, you know, you do a lot 19 of that, and that's all very healthful. So I just 20 wanted to get the word out that you live longer if you 21 play bingo. We need to let people know that this is 22 a -- and it makes sense. If you retire or have nothing 23 to do and you're just going to lay around and don't do 24 anything interesting, you're going to vegetate and die. 25 I happen to know about six people. 0067 1 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I know some attorneys 2 that need to play bingo. 3 MR. DOUGHERTY: I can just name six 4 people that I have been associated with that are all 5 elderly. Holly, she's 93 -- or, 92, I believe, just as 6 happy as she can be, and she totally credits her 7 getting around and getting out every day and driving 8 her car to coming to play bingo, and I have many 9 others. It's wonderful to see these people out there. 10 Now, the ones I know, happen to be women. Well, I do 11 know one male. He lives out in Lakeway and drives in 12 all that way every day to play bingo, and that's what 13 keeps him going. These are just small examples, and so 14 all these things are important. I could go on and on. 15 Money. Can I take my only example inference? This 16 isn't necessarily bingo, but, I spend more time in 17 casinos than I do playing bingo. You know why? 18 Because big money, big pots out there. When I go to 19 Louisiana, I go at least once a month, I earn about 20 three or four thousand points on their card system, and 21 to get a point, I have to spend $5, so -- 22 MS. MORRIS: Hello. Hello. Excuse me. 23 Excuse me. Sir, I'm going to -- 24 MR. DOUGHERTY: -- for every point that 25 I earn, it's $5, so I am putting through that -- 0068 1 MS. MORRIS: I'm going to point you back 2 to your survey and bring you back here to your survey 3 and ask you to please continue, but come on back to 4 your survey. That is what this agenda item is about. 5 MR. DOUGHERTY: Well, I have a tendency 6 to sort of -- 7 MS. MORRIS: That's all right, I have a 8 tendency to listen. Please come back to the survey. 9 It may be that you want to talk about other things. 10 Chairman, these can be items for future 11 agendas, but -- I'm sorry to be interrupting. 12 CHAIR BRACKETT: Oh, that's fine. It's 13 your job to keep us going in the right direction. 14 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Madame Chairman, I have 15 a question. On the page -- on page seven, why do 16 people play Charitable Bingo, do you have a breakdown, 17 a percentage of that? I mean, what's the percentage? 18 MS. JAMBOR: I do, but not with me. Not 19 with me. It should be -- it should be in the study on 20 the web site, and if it's not, Pete, you just get ahold 21 of me and I'll make sure I get you those numbers for 22 every single response. 23 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I will. Okay. I 24 appreciate that. I was just wondering what percentage 25 of people play bingo so that they might live longer. 0069 1 MS. JAMBOR: That response was not on 2 the list, and I don't -- in the other, where they go to 3 put in something, I don't recall anybody writing that 4 in. 5 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Okay. 6 CHAIR BRACKETT: I want to make a 7 comment. I think this is a wonderful survey, and I do 8 not like to read surveys, but your presentation was 9 very, very good and, of course, it's a very primary 10 interest of mine, too, but this is very, very useful 11 information and I really appreciate Jack's work on it 12 and sticking with it and the assistance with the work 13 that we got from the bingo division. 14 Where do you see us going from here 15 besides using it to get people in the halls and using 16 it for information in other ways? 17 MS. JAMBOR: Well, I think what -- I 18 think the groups that worked on this initially can come 19 back together and put down the questions that weren't 20 answered, the questions that they initially had that 21 possibly weren't answered by this or the questions that 22 now come about because of this information. I can -- 23 and as I said before, we need to look at the way this 24 instrument was distributed before any others are put 25 out there. May be there's another way to do that. Get 0070 1 input from the BAC as far as what questions they may 2 have after reading this and seeing -- having a little 3 bit more understanding of the bingo players, what else 4 do they want to know. 5 MR. ATKINS: I think another benefit 6 would be, from this survey, is if in the future there's 7 a decision to conduct other demographic surveys every 8 two years, whatever, then at that time we'll be able to 9 see if there are changes to those demographics to those 10 players. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: And would the second 12 survey, if there were one, would it go to the same 13 region or would it be in a different region? 14 MS. JAMBOR: Well, it would still be 15 distributed across the state and rated by region and 16 class unless we did a region-specific survey. I don't 17 at this point know why that would happen, but, you 18 know, you can't exclude it, but we would still use the 19 same methodology as far as rating the distribution so 20 that we got a good representation across the state. 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: Does anyone else have 22 any other questions or comments? 23 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Great job. Thank you. 24 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yeah, it's a wonderful 25 job. And I think what we have right now, you can 0071 1 certainly start using and promoting your bingo 2 operation. And I was not -- I found your presentation 3 much more interesting than my reading would be. 4 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Very much so. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Color makes a 6 difference. 7 Are there any questions from anyone 8 attending that would like to comment on this? 9 MR. DOUGHERTY: Let's here from the 10 public. What do you think about this one and future 11 surveys? 12 MR. FENOGLIO: For the record, my name 13 is Stephen Fenoglio. I think it's a very valuable tool 14 and I would like to see the BAC pursue this with the 15 commission staff, and thanks to the commission staff 16 for all of their help. 17 CHAIR BRACKETT: Thank you, Stephen. 18 Do we want to make a recommendation at 19 this time, Jack, that we pursue this further? 20 MR. DOUGHERTY: I would certainly 21 recommend that -- this isn't an action item. 22 CHAIR BRACKETT: This is not an action 23 item. 24 MR. DOUGHERTY: Well, I sure appreciate 25 what Norma and Liz have done. Thank you very much. 0072 1 MS. MORRIS: You're going to be able to 2 come back on a future agenda item for future agenda 3 issues. And if you don't, I will remind you, so I'm 4 going to come back to you, too. 5 MR. DOUGHERTY: Thank you. I know you 6 will. 7 MS. MOO: But it's not this item, sir. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. We're at Item 9 No. 9: Report and possible discussion on the 10 activities of alternative styles of bingo games, 11 including internet gaming subcommittee. 12 Danny is making this report. 13 MR. MOORE: Thank you. This group, I 14 just met yesterday for the first time, and I want to 15 apologize right there. This is part of our plan, and 16 it's obvious it just needs to be ongoing with the BAC 17 at all times. I think the meetings need to be more 18 frequent. It's obvious that bringing in event tickets 19 and seal cards, by looking back at this quarterly 20 report, of 40 percent impacts is -- well, over the last 21 year and getting our numbers back to where they were in 22 '96, that's a huge increase and probably saved a few 23 bingo halls here in the state. 24 We need to keep looking for new things 25 in this industry and there are games out there that are 0073 1 being used in other states. We discussed yesterday a 2 little bit about different ideas and forms of bingo 3 games, whether it be link bingo, progressive bingo. 4 There's actually a movement here in the state right 5 now, it's a coalition of different sectors of bingo, 6 and we're looking into IBC's we call them; they're 7 instant bingo card minders. For people that don't know 8 what that is, it would basically give you the ability 9 to play pull tabs on your electronic card-minding 10 devices. We haven't really done any studies on that 11 yet, and Billy's staff has offered to help us in any 12 way with information they've gathered, whether it's on 13 progressives or this topic. 14 We note that there may be a session 15 coming up here in the spring and this group is going to 16 try to plod on with this, and if anybody needs any 17 information, I can help with that. We just need to 18 keep looking for alternatives here, folks. It's the 19 only way we're going to stay in this business, and I 20 encourage you all to contact this subcommittee on this 21 topic 22 MR. ATKINS: I think in our meeting 23 yesterday, we kind of tried to break down some of the 24 tasks associated with it. I know that Danny is 25 planning on going to Bingo World next week or the 0074 1 following week? 2 MR. MOORE: The 9th through the 11th. 3 MR. ATKINS: -- the 9th through the 4 11thm and so he has volunteered to gather every piece 5 of information that he can, literature, et cetera, on 6 alternative styles of play. If I remember correctly, 7 if I don't, I know I'll be corrected, Jaime McNally and 8 Shayne Woodard, also members of the subcommittee, 9 discussed that they could begin work on legislative 10 histories of past legislation that's been introduced in 11 terms of the bingo games, multi-hall bingo games, E 12 tabs, et cetera, and the staff, on our part, has begun 13 to compile information that we've been gathering on 14 these different types of games from other 15 jurisdictions, so we set a -- our next meeting day was 16 March 22nd. March 22nd is when we'll come back 17 together and start collating all that information and 18 start asking some questions, you know, particularly in 19 jurisdictions where these items have been introduced, 20 how they fared, what difficulties, if any, that they 21 have, we can hear what successes do they have that we 22 can copy. 23 Something that I just thought of after 24 that committee met yesterday is, I do think one thing 25 that we should be looking at is how can we ensure to 0075 1 the best of our ability that the introduction of 2 these -- any type of these games, should they be 3 introduced, have a positive effect on charitable 4 distributions. Because, you know, like the question 5 was asked, how can we have this substantial increase in 6 gross receipts but a reduction in charitable 7 distributions? I know the committee will want to, like 8 I say, make sure, where possible, that any of these 9 additional forms of games would have that positive 10 impact. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: Charles Hutchins, do 12 you want to make comments on this? 13 MR. HUTCHINS: My name is Charles 14 Hutchins, Dallas, Texas. Yes, ma'am, please. 15 We are in need of alternatives to the 16 normal of what we call the bingo games today, and the 17 event tabs have done well. They have really been a God 18 send for a lot of people, but we need -- we need more. 19 If, if, and I say if, because I don't believe anyone 20 knows what will happen or never does, but should the 21 racetracks become a thing, well, then bingo is going to 22 take an awful hit. If they get video lottery terminals 23 in the racetracks, bingo is going to take a hit, and I 24 don't think we should object to that. The state needs 25 the funds. I don't think we have a lot of problems 0076 1 with that, but at the same time, we're going to have to 2 have something to follow along the line to keep the 3 bingo player in the hall instead of them down at the 4 racetrack. As Danny eluded to, I think these instant 5 bingo card minders, I think there's a lot of people in 6 this state in the bingo industry that have got together 7 and decided that is probably our best bet, and that is 8 what we're working for. We're trying to set up the 9 mechanisms by which to push for that, but we are going 10 to have to have something. If they get video lottery 11 in the racetracks and bingo doesn't have some kind of 12 machine or something to help the bingo, then bingo will 13 become a thing of the past. It's really going to take 14 a hit. In the impacts I've seen, it says 13 or 14 or 15 15 percent or something, you know, I would say it would 16 probably be -- anywhere close to a racetrack is 17 probably going to be more than that. It's probably 18 going to be anywhere into the 30 percent, so we really 19 need to take a look at it. The bingo industry needs to 20 get together, get together with you guys, get together 21 with the commission down here, and work out some 22 language or something that everyone can agree on so 23 that we can go to the legislature and try to get things 24 summed up and keep us in the game. That's my comment. 25 CHAIR BRACKETT: Thank you. Keep in 0077 1 contact with Danny. And, then if you can contact 2 Charles. 3 Bill -- I don't know how to pronounce 4 your last name. He has left the building, and so 5 Stephen, it's your turn. 6 MR. FENOGLIO: Thank you, Madame Chair. 7 For the record, my name is Stephen Fenoglio. I am 8 handing out in response to some analysis we've started 9 doing, and with the help of Danny Moore and others in 10 the industry and with the help of the commission staff 11 in looking at some updated bingo numbers, from looking 12 at -- and, of course, the commission has on its web 13 site the 20th annual reports. We've obtained from the 14 commission updated numbers. I'm sure the calendar year 15 2003 will be massaged somewhat. 16 As you know, the quarterly reports were 17 due the 25th of January for the last quarter of '03, 18 but in trying to step back and look at the broader 19 picture of where bingo was and where it is, everyone 20 knows the glory day was in 1991 at the peak of bingo 21 when revenues were about $671 million. As of '03, 22 that's down 16 percent, to $565 million, and the first 23 set of charts that have, that's the first page on gross 24 receipts, attendance is, likewise, down from 37 million 25 to 21 million, a significant drop. And then you look 0078 1 at some of, well, how has Texas done in those 2 intervening years, and the data on the third page is -- 3 since this data that showed the population in Texas 4 went from 17.3 million to 21.7 million, or about 25 5 percent increase in population. 6 And then the other number that people 7 who crunch numbers look at is, well, what's the per 8 capita income, the available moneys that people spend 9 for whatever, and you see those numbers from the same 10 period went from $17,450 a year to $28,500, or a 11 64 percent increase per capita, and that somewhat 12 ducktails with some of the other data that the staff 13 has presented in the past. This state has gotten 14 wealthier and bingo has not, and we know that, but 15 these are the hard numbers. 16 We've also done a chart on attendance by 17 quarter and then pull tab sales by quarter, and you can 18 see that -- and I'm sorry, back up just a minute -- the 19 electronic sales by quarter. There was a shot in the 20 arm in bingo based on what the legislature did in '95 21 and the commission implementing that rule in '96 where 22 card-minding sales went up and they went up 23 dramatically and they plateaued, but that was an 24 important new revenue source for some people. The 25 costs were upside down, but with any new technology, 0079 1 there are going to be additional costs and 2 unanticipated costs. And then the point of that is, 3 when you get new technology -- which is what Danny was 4 talking about earlier, I believe -- you know, build it 5 and they will come, and the industry built card 6 minders. Game Tech was the first company out of the 7 box to get to the market and the customers came and 8 they're still there. 9 And then you see the attendance by 10 quarter and how it has followed down -- flowed down; 11 although, there is an up tick, a very narrow up tick, 12 but an up tick nonetheless, when you look at the fourth 13 quarter of '02 to '03, as a promise of hope. And, 14 certainly, the third quarter of '03 versus the third 15 quarter of '02 has come up. That, in large part, we 16 believe, is helped by the different pull tab sales 17 products that were authorized in July of '02 with a new 18 rule that Billy Atkins and the industry and the 19 commission worked together to bring, and then we now 20 have new pull tab sales product. Some of you heard 21 David Hinely's stories, true stores I might add, of 22 what some of those charity halls have been able to do, 23 and you see the last number is the pull tab -- or, the 24 last chart is the pull tab sales by quarter, and those 25 are some dramatic increases. Again, if you build it, 0080 1 they will come. 2 The other chart is a disturbing event, 3 and this is from Comptroller Strayhorn's numbers on a 4 fiscal note to a bill that Representative Flores had 5 introduced in the 2003 session that would have 6 authorized video lottery terminals, and you can see at 7 the bottom of page three of five that the comptroller 8 had estimated that there would be a loss of revenue on 9 bingo prize fees of 11.8 percent, which y'all know if 10 prize fees go down 11.8, the revenues are going to go 11 down 11.8 percent, and 11.8 percent equates to roughly 12 to $50 million to $60 million a year, which would be a, 13 to put the best spin on it, a chaotic situation if you 14 have that type of a fall off. We believe video lottery 15 terminals were implemented for the state without a 16 bingo product being offered for charitable bingo, and 17 we believe that's the instant bingo card minder that 18 Danny and others have talked about. It is an issue. 19 By the way, this Bingo Advisory 20 Committee took a position in 2002 in the Sunset process 21 to support, we called it either IBC or E-ticket 22 machines or E-tab machines, whereby, if you have a pull 23 tab product, it's on a video screen or it's on a card 24 minder that's already in the halls today. Obviously, 25 it would have to have new legislation to authorize that 0081 1 and new rules to do that. We believe there's some 2 incredible benefits, one of which is, we think the 3 trend would be reversed with bingo and it would be a 4 shot in the arm for bingo. We also think from the 5 auditing side, and having spent quite a bit of time, 6 and perhaps more time than Billy wanted me to, with his 7 staff writing rules and implementing some things, one 8 of the common things that has come through is, you 9 know, in the digital world, have a seamless accounting 10 of the moneys. 11 And the beauty of a card minder, as 12 Billy knows, and we just wrote a new rule, is that all 13 of the numbers, all of the revenues, are recorded 14 through the card minder and it's instantaneous 15 reporting. They can actually look at it online if they 16 so choose from Austin, Texas to see if there's any 17 funny business going on. It makes it a lot easier to 18 count the moneys and make sure that the moneys are 19 properly accounted and credited to the account. 20 The same can be true with an IBC, where 21 it's an instantaneous recognition by Austin. It could 22 be, and I would hope it would be, Billy, that, if we 23 got this far, that those prize fees could be taken out 24 right at the point of sale, or point of redemption, if 25 you will, and escrowed into an account so that you 0082 1 don't have all the audit issues of chasing some of 2 those moneys and you always have a concern at some 3 point, some charities have actually not escrowed their 4 prize fee moneys appropriately, and there's been either 5 accounting questions or licensing questions because not 6 all the funds are put aside, but if you did it through 7 an IBC, an electronic cash registry, if you will, those 8 funds are already put aside into an account, a safe 9 box, if you will. 10 We're happy to be here. We would like 11 for the committee to move as promptly as possible. 12 There is discussion in the newspaper about a special 13 session this spring where VLT's could be considered, 14 and we believe this new instant form of gaming 15 charitable bingo with IBC's would be a huge shot in the 16 arm for the industry. And I'll be happy to answer any 17 questions. 18 MR. DOUGHERTY: Steve, as a matter of 19 definition on video lottery terminals, is that simply a 20 video buying of a lottery ticket or does it just have a 21 higher -- 22 MR. FENOGLIO: Well, it is a purchase of 23 a lottery ticket. 24 MS. MORRIS: Mr. Fenoglio, I'm going to 25 interrupt you as well. This is not about what else is 0083 1 out there or defining that or having that discussion. 2 I suspect that that was part of his presentation, but 3 it's not now about trying to understand what a video 4 lottery terminal is. This is about bingo and bingo 5 games. The specific posting is bingo games. 6 MR. FENOGLIO: Well, you could have an 7 alternative style of bingo including a video lottery 8 equivalent with VLT. But, Jack, I'll be happy to talk 9 about this after the meeting with you and answer those 10 questions. 11 Certainly, for the IBC, the alternative 12 game, it would be a pull tab that would be a video 13 version sitting on a card-minder -- I'm sorry I didn't 14 bring one of the card-minders, but I know you've played 15 them and I know you know what they look like -- where 16 it could be digitally represented on the screen and you 17 would literally open digitally the doors of the 18 perforated tabs, if you will, and it would display a 19 winner or a loser. They would all be pre-determined in 20 advance, winners and losers. There would be a, quote, 21 virtual deal, if you will, just like the box of pull 22 tabs, or the deal of pull tabs, that Danny Moore 23 distributed. They would be tested by the Lottery 24 Commission for graphics, approved symbols. The Lottery 25 would have to verify that they are, in fact, randomly 0084 1 placed in the virtual deal, and they would be, quote, 2 opened or pulled open graphically on a video screen. 3 It's similar to how you do a paper -- you play paper 4 virtually on a card-minder where the machine daubs it 5 when you hit in 12, which the number 12 is called, and 6 it digitally, visually daubs the number 12 on all the 7 cards that you have purchased that are sitting in the 8 hand-held card-minding device for the session. 9 We think that if that does come to pass, 10 and we hope that it does, that it would be a huge shot 11 in the arm for charitable bingo and you would see a 12 dramatic reversal of this steady decline from -- and I 13 think the latest numbers are -- and I'm sure Mr. Atkins 14 has them at the top of his tongue or the top of his 15 head. It used to be there were about 1900 licensed 16 charitable organizations. I think there are about 1400 17 now, and so, you know, you see the numbers $671 million 18 to $565 million, it's a slow and steady decline, and 19 with a new product as the card minder did in '95, '96 20 time frame and the pull tab did, you could see a 21 dramatic reversal in the fortunes of charitable bingo. 22 MS. TAYLOR: Do you fell this would 23 bring in new customers? 24 MR. FENOGLIO: Absolutely. I don't 25 think there would be any question that you would bring 0085 1 in -- I mean, you know, you saw that when you 2 instituted card-minders, there's a different class of 3 customer who wants to play a card-minder than 4 traditional paper, and you saw the same thing, I 5 believe, I know I've seen it in halls and I think Dave 6 Hinely may speak on this, but, with the new pull tab 7 products, you saw a different -- and, certainly, some 8 of the same customers play the new products because you 9 saw a new increase of a different type of customer 10 coming in that door. You know, there's a reason you 11 bring on a new product all the time. 12 MR. ATKINS: Well, could you talk a 13 little more about that, Steve, because I don't know 14 that we -- I don't know that we saw that in the 15 information submitted by organizations with the 16 introduction of card-minding devices. 17 MR. FENOGLIO: I have seen it in halls 18 where there's a younger class of player who plays -- 19 and I see Suzanne nodding her head and Larry nodding 20 his head and Mario nodding his head -- you see a 21 younger class of player playing the card-minder than 22 plays paper, and that has to do somewhat with the 23 generational divide, if you will. 24 MR. ATKINS: And maybe I didn't ask my 25 question correctly or maybe I misunderstood your 0086 1 question. And you've noted it here, a continual 2 decline in attendance. 3 MR. FENOGLIO: Yes. 4 MR. ATKINS: And, again, it was -- I 5 think it was our understanding that, with the 6 introduction of card-minding devices, one of the ways 7 those card minding devices were sold is that you would 8 see that decline stop, and I think we've seen it 9 continue. What do you think the pattern would be with 10 the introduction of the card-minding pull tabs? 11 MR. FENOGLIO: I think, number one, 12 you'll see a stop in the gradual rate of decline. I 13 mean, if you keep the track that is represented in 14 graphs on page two on point, at some point you will be 15 presiding over a staff of zero because there's not 16 going to be anyone left, and so, in my way of thinking, 17 the first thing you do is stop the bleeding, if you 18 will, the hemorrhaging of loss of customer and loss of 19 revenue. 20 And, by the way, it's important to note 21 that the per capita spend in bingo, I believe, if my 22 numbers are correct -- and you can do the math; I 23 didn't do -- well, I did it last night and I didn't 24 bring my notes -- I believe it was around $20 per 25 person spent in bingo; it's now about $26. And, again, 0087 1 the population of Texas has increased; we know that. 2 The per capita income in Texas has increased; we know 3 that. Bingo revenues have gone down, but what the 4 savvy bingo hall customers have done is squeeze more of 5 that money from their player. They've lost, in 6 absolute terms, more players, but they've made some of 7 that decline in what you would expect a gradual fall 8 off to be by getting more money from customers. Part 9 of that is inflation; we know that. 10 There's also a part, Billy, that I think 11 you can see where, because you brought a card-minder to 12 the table, and those were more expensive than the 13 equivalent paper product, people were willing to spend 14 more because that was an exciting, or more exciting, 15 way to play, and I think the same is true for the pull 16 tab. You know, it's like the -- when my kids play 17 video games or they want a cell phone, now the way 18 AT&T, or whoever the manufacturer of a cell phone is, 19 they squeeze more money out of a customer because they 20 load it up with different features. It's still a 21 mobile phone; it still calls from point A to point 22 paint B, but they get economies of sale, but they get 23 more dollar from the customer because they bring out a 24 new product. I think that's what's crucial for bingo 25 is, we need another product to bring out -- to hold our 0088 1 customer base, number one, and then, number two, to 2 give them a new product and charge additional revenues 3 for that, which equates to additional profits for 4 charitable bingo. 5 MR. WHITTINGTON: I also wanted to ask 6 you: Most of my computer players in my hall, which is 7 quite a few, they really don't buy a lot of paper pull 8 tabs because their mind is elevated to computerized 9 more than anything, and at that point, I can see those 10 computer players buying pull tabs because the computer 11 puts them out on this instant -- the bingo product. 12 Okay? I can see a big increase, as far as money spent, 13 through that computer player because we didn't have 14 this product in our hall because people play more pull 15 tabs. 16 MS. TAYLOR: I would hope that, if this 17 is going to be some type of game on the computer, that 18 maybe the people that aren't bingo players or think 19 they're too young to be a bingo player or too savvy or 20 too educated to be a bingo player, maybe they would 21 come in just to play the instant bingo card-minders and 22 might not necessarily want to play bingo, so I hope 23 that for every person in the doors is another dollar in 24 our pocket. You know, we pay out the same amount 25 whether we have 100 people walk in our hall or if you 0089 1 300 people walk in that hall. We keep paying out the 2 same amount of money and we have the same expenses with 3 very little difference in the cost of the paper or the 4 computer they play, or whatever. I mean, we have all 5 those fixed expenses, so we've got to get more people 6 into these halls, and if this is what it takes to get 7 them in, maybe then we could start advertising because 8 we would have more money. 9 MR. FENOGLIO: If you have more money, 10 then you have more to spend for advertising so you can 11 bring in more people to bring in more money, et cetera. 12 And I think that's the underlying premise of any new 13 product that comes to market is, you create an 14 excitement for it. 15 MR. ATKINS: And the position that I'm 16 working from is that, what I hear continuously from 17 organizations, using the examples of card-minders, is 18 that they were all promised that, once those devices 19 were installed, you know, there were just going to be 20 swarms of people coming into their halls and playing, 21 you know, these devices, and they haven't seen that 22 occur, so I know that, from our point of view as we 23 move forward on the subcommittee, you know, if 24 representations are made to us that, you know, for 25 whatever reason there's an anticipated increase, you 0090 1 know, we're going to ask a lot of questions, you know, 2 to try and get down to specifics, how those estimates 3 are made. 4 MR. FENOGLIO: And I think that's a fair 5 question to ask. I think the comptroller can help you 6 with some of that data based on what they saw when they 7 calculated the fiscal impact on a different side. 8 MR. WHITTINGTON: But on the other hand, 9 too, if you got these stationaries in place, or the 10 computers, like I said, you got to account that only a 11 certain amount of people can play them and that's going 12 to deter people in the facility bringing people in the 13 hall to them like we used to have it. It actually hurt 14 us having 40 percent computer players versus paper 15 players. That really hurt a lot of people coming in 16 because they came in and couldn't play because we had 17 capped out at 40 percent. 18 MR. ATKINS: Well, you raise a good 19 point, and this is something that the work group talked 20 about yesterday was the fact that, you know, that 21 40 percent came from, you know, groups of bingo 22 organizations that didn't want the devices at all, so, 23 you know, that was the compromise, was to put some type 24 of limitation on it. And we discussed in the work 25 group yesterday that one of the things we also want to 0091 1 spend time working on with all of these different 2 items, whether it's progressive, pull tabs, or 3 whatever, is, you know, anticipate those concerns from 4 other organizations and address them up-front so that, 5 you know, we can more fully provide, at least to the 6 commission, a complete and total picture of these 7 different alternatives. 8 You know, one just quick example is the 9 progressive bingo game. You know, I still don't know 10 that there's a consensus regarding the -- I think 11 everybody theoretically likes the idea of the 12 progressive bingo game, but I can't get any kind of 13 consensus with anyone as to whether or not the prize 14 limit should be limited or not. Some organizations I 15 talked to -- well, some organizations I talked to, no, 16 they don't want it. Now, again, that's something we 17 have to deal with is, you know, here's another 18 opportunity for organizations to make money, but there 19 are organizations out there that don't want it, so 20 we're going to have to deal with that. There are other 21 organizations that want the prize limit capped as to 22 what it can grow to, and then there are other 23 organizations that don't want a cap, so we've just got 24 this broad spectrum of opinions, you know, from 25 everybody that I think this work group needs to spend 0092 1 time taking into consideration and be aware of it and 2 be prepared to answer some of it. 3 MR. WHITTINGTON: So, the main thing is 4 basically to -- on those organizations you're speaking 5 about, they need to -- if they want to do it, they can. 6 If they don't, hey, this is what it is, and I think we 7 need more innovations out there. I really think we got 8 four hours to play for a charity per day and we're not 9 utilizing that time at all, and I think an innovation 10 like the electronic pull tabs will give us those 11 complete four hours of people coming in and playing 12 those pull tabs. 13 MR. FENOGLIO: And, Billy, you do raise 14 a good point. Because there was, within the industry, 15 in '95, when the card-minder issue arose in the 16 legislature, very much a fear that -- by the small 17 halls, if you will, the halls that pay -- the charities 18 pay $100, just say $800 your license fee versus the 19 much larger halls, that that product would be put -- 20 the card-minder would be put in the big halls and to 21 the small halls' expense. I don't think that's the 22 issue this time around. 23 We have spent a number of hours with, 24 for example, Elks Lodge people who were one -- people 25 who were one of the groups -- I'm generalizing 0093 1 somewhat -- but they were one of the groups who were 2 very nervous about card-minders, but we don't have a 3 full resolution yet, but we believe they're going to be 4 in support of this. The Veterans Post, for another 5 one, and the Veterans Organization I have spoken with 6 personally are excited about this idea because we 7 believe the market will be a lot broader for 8 card-minders since the market is already much more 9 developed today than it was. And I think Mr. Moore is 10 going to tell us, when he comes back from the world 11 games, that there are a lot of manufacturers out there 12 who are ready to come to the market. 13 Be that as it may, we'll be happy to 14 work with you. And to that extent, I had faxed both 15 you and Ms. Brackett back in December, I belive, or 16 maybe it was in November, a request to be notified of 17 the subcommittee on alternative gaming, and things get 18 lost, and I understand, and I'll follow that up, but I 19 would like to be notified. I'd actually asked you to 20 be a part of the subcommittee, but I'm not sure I could 21 have handled it yesterday. But if you want more 22 information and input from licensed organizations, I 23 represent a large number, I would be happy to give you 24 that and work with you and the committee members on 25 that. 0094 1 MR. ATKINS: And I'll speak for me not 2 the entire work group, but I know we would appreciate 3 that information. And the members of the work group, 4 Steve, as you know, are on the web site with contact 5 information for that. I just want to make sure that -- 6 we've spent a lot of time talking about the E-tab 7 machines, and I want to make sure that we all 8 understand that, much like we did with the pull tab 9 rule where we cast the broadest math that we could and 10 looked at everything out there that we use, this group 11 has an opportunity to do the same thing. 12 THE WITNESS: Thank you, Madame Chair 13 and members. 14 CHAIR BRACKETT: Thank you. 15 Danny, are you chairman of this group or 16 is it -- 17 MS. TAYLOR: Danny. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Suzanne has informed me 19 that you're chairman, so you'll be happy to add Steve 20 to your -- 21 MR. MOORE: Okay. She asked if I would 22 take over and I was happy to. 23 MS. TAYLOR: Danny has a lot more 24 opportunity and a lot more knowledge of where it needs 25 to go, so I'll be glad to assist him, but I think it 0095 1 would be smarter to let him chair that group. 2 CHAIR BRACKETT: Jane Thompson would 3 like to comment on this same agenda item, No. 9. 4 MS. THOMPSON: Jane Thompson with 5 Thompson Allstate Bingo Supply. I just want to add my 6 name to the list to offer assistance to the work group. 7 As a distributor and I've been working with the 8 coalition to provide charitable bingo, and I see the 9 importance in it. I feel a sense of urgency on this 10 because of -- is March 22nd the next BAC meeting or is 11 that the next meeting of the work group? I just want 12 to add my name to the list, and I'm happy to volunteer 13 my services as a distributor and give you any kind of 14 information you need. 15 I think the IBC is a real important part 16 in our moving forward in the alternative style of 17 gaming, and I just want to be on record that it's very 18 important to me to try to get this information out and 19 let the industry know. It's industry wide. We're 20 trying to get everybody in the industry involved in 21 this IBC, the instant card-minding bingo device, so I'm 22 willing to help however, so call me if you need me. 23 CHAIR BRACKETT: Thank you. You offer 24 is accepted. 25 Any other comments on Item No. 9? One 0096 1 more. I'm sorry. I think you'd signed up. Right? 2 MR. HEINLINE: I don't think I signed 3 up. 4 CHAIR BRACKETT: No, but I'll add it in 5 here. 6 MR. HEINLINE: David Hinely. I'm the 7 representative of several charitable bingo conductors. 8 I wanted to comment that the alternate styles of bingo 9 are very important and I'm very glad that we're doing 10 that, and I wanted to offer -- to tell you that I would 11 be glad to help, too, with information because I do 12 have, I think, a lot of -- I'm a numbers person, so 13 I've got a lot of numbers that I think would be helpful 14 to you. One of those is to demonstrate that, when we 15 get on alternate product, which we did do in 2002, and 16 we began to receive our products in October of 2002, 17 just that it would be helpful to know the effect that 18 they had. I see in the report that we've handed out 19 today that our attendance has diminished, or declined, 20 once again almost five percent. I do believe, though, 21 that if all of the charitable bingo conductors had been 22 able to implement the event tabs that were offered to 23 us in the same way that my star performers have done, 24 they wouldn't have had that, because in our particular 25 case, we actually increased attendance for the year 0097 1 2003 over 2002 by 5.6 percent and we increased our 2 revenue paid to the state in winners' fees by 76.57 3 percent. Our instant sales per session increased 4 174.06 percent. 5 If that performance were able to be 6 modeled by all of the charitable bingo conductors, the 7 state would increase their revenue from what it 8 received of $20,746,000 in the year 2003, it could have 9 been $31,550,000, so it would be a tremendous change, 10 and so I think these would be helpful numbers. One of 11 the problems with implementing, though, in this fashion 12 is it requires a tremendous effort with a sales staff 13 that can do this, and not everybody can do that, but as 14 we've been able to train some of them, we've got one 15 hall that's doing that, and another one that's coming 16 up close to it, a third hall that's coming up behind 17 them, and a fourth, so we're training them one at a 18 time to do that. 19 That could be implemented in a lot 20 quicker fashion if they had the electronic digital way 21 of doing that because it wouldn't require the sales 22 staff that's understanding -- actually doing the 23 selling; the machine could sell it for them, so I think 24 that's a very appropriate thing to look at to increase 25 the bottom line, which is -- the main reason we're here 0098 1 is to increase the charitable distribution, and we are 2 able to do that by these kinds of increases, because in 3 this particular hall, their increase was over a quarter 4 of a million dollars in one year. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any questions? Thank 6 you. I think that concludes Item No. 9. 7 And before we move on, I need to ask you 8 and also our reporter, do you want to just continue to 9 work and not take a lunch break and complete the 10 agenda? What's the pleasure? 11 MR. MOORE: Keep on rolling. 12 CHAIR BRACKETT: All right. We'll keep 13 on rolling. 14 So that brings us to Item No. 10, and 15 I'm glad we agreed to go on because I've been seeing 16 you walking up and down the hall. 17 MR. ATKINS: If I could start real 18 quickly, madame Chair. The Sunset bill for the Lottery 19 Commission didn't pass last session, so the agency is 20 up for review during this period, and that process has 21 started and we have put notification of that on our web 22 site and also in a special edition Bingo Bulletin that 23 we sent out to our licensees, and you have copies of 24 those in your notebook. 25 You also have in your notebook the 0099 1 Sunset Commission's review schedule for 2004, and they 2 currently plan on conducting their review of the 3 Lottery Commission about mid January through mid April. 4 The agency held their entrance conference with the 5 Sunset staff on January 22nd, and there have been 6 several meetings with staff and -- agency staff and the 7 Sunset staff since then. The Sunset Commission is 8 going to be conducting what they call a limited review, 9 and that review will be limited to the eight items that 10 were the Sunset recommendations for 2002 and they will 11 be reviewing the appropriateness of those items. And 12 no one is jumping up and down saying that I'm saying 13 that wrong, so I'm going to assume that's correct. 14 You also have in your notebook the 15 Sunset Advisory Commission meeting schedule for 2004. 16 Currently, the Lottery Commission's public item is 17 scheduled for May 18th or 19th of 2004. The Sunset 18 staff will have issued their report approximately a 19 month prior to that. The Sunset Commission decision 20 meeting is currently scheduled for July 13th and 14th 21 of 2004. We have provided to the Sunset staff a list 22 of all the current BAC members, so if you haven't yet, 23 you may be contacted by them. 24 And also, just so you know, a lot of the 25 work that you have been doing up to this point has been 0100 1 related to the implementation of many of the management 2 recommendations that were contained in the Sunset 3 report, so a lot of the rules that we've been working 4 on, the revisions that we made to the BAC rule last 5 year, the rules dealing with audit requirements, et 6 cetera, are part of the staff's account to go ahead 7 and, where possible, move forward on some of those 8 management recommendations, working on them and getting 9 them implemented. 10 And that's really the report that I have 11 prepared. I don't know if Ms. Trevino has anything to 12 add or if she's just available for any questions. 13 MS. TREVINO: Just for the record, I am 14 Nelda Trevino, the director of governmental affairs, 15 and I really don't have anything to add to what Billy 16 has reported on. I'd be happy to answer any questions 17 that the committee might have. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Any questions? Thank 19 you appreciate your time. 20 MS. TREVINO: You bet. 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: We're to Item No. 11, 22 which is: Consideration of and possible discussion 23 and/or action on the Bingo Advisory Committee report to 24 the Texas Lottery Commission on the Texas bingo 25 industry. 0101 1 And I'd ask you now to bring items for 2 this. You're going to have to speak up and say what 3 you want included in this report. 4 MR. ATKINS: It may help, if I can, 5 Madame Chair, this is one of the items that is on the 6 Advisory Committee's work plan, a report to the 7 commission, and it's also, I believe, contained in the 8 BAC rule itself that the Advisory Committee will make a 9 report to the commission on the status of the bingo 10 industry, and so I believe that is what, Madame Chair, 11 you're requesting of the members now, those items. 12 CHAIR BRACKETT: Item No. 1: Comment on 13 improvement and status of the bingo industry. 14 MR. ATKINS: Yes, ma'am. 15 CHAIR BRACKETT: Now, this says that 16 the BAC will review and comment on charitable bingo 17 gross receipts, et cetera. This is really a done thing 18 by the yearly -- or, the financial report and the 19 selling report that we've already considered in here. 20 Correct? On the four quarters for 2003. 21 MR. ATKINS: I think you could submit 22 that. I think there's an expectation from the 23 commission that there be a comment on it from the BAC. 24 Do you think it's good? Do you think it's bad? Why do 25 you think it's good? Why do you think it's bad? 0102 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: So what are your 2 comments on that, on the report that we had, the 3 financial report? 4 MS. TAYLOR: I like the increase in the 5 gross; however, I don't like the decrease in the 6 charitable distribution. 7 MS. GREENFIELD: I think the attendance 8 figures are pretty disturbing. We need to try to do 9 something about attendance and bring that level up as 10 well as the alternative styles, combine those with the 11 IBC and other things that we're talking about. 12 MR. MOORE: Well, I think the most 13 dramatic thing is still the change in the instant gross 14 receipt -- or, the sales of instant bingo right now. I 15 think it's been a big boost, and I think it needs to be 16 pointed out that it was a huge ordeal for us to take 17 on, and we got it to the charities and they've been 18 able to utilize it and make more money. 19 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I'll very much go along 20 with that, Danny. I think we've got to continue making 21 changes. We've got to improve it; we've got to do 22 something new and different, something more exciting. 23 Every time I go into a Stop & Rob out there, there's a 24 new lottery game. That's exactly what the Lottery 25 Commission does. We can't fall behind; we've got to 0103 1 keep up by coming up with something new and different. 2 If I had to pick out one thing in the report, it would 3 be exactly that, the increase in the pull tabs. 4 CHAIR BRACKETT: And then for future 5 planning, you want to say go ahead and keep these new 6 productions coming? 7 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Absolutely. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: I have some written 9 comments here that Patricia -- 10 MR. ATKINS: Can I make one comment? 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: Certainly. 12 MR. ATKINS: Kind of along the lines 13 that you were talking about, Pete. It might be 14 beneficial for the Advisory Committee to explore one 15 thing when you talk about the introduction of new 16 products and the impact they have because, as you'll 17 recall, the BAC also did a lot of work on the bingo 18 paper rules and provided for all kinds of additional 19 bingo paper, but we're still seeing some significant 20 decreases in that area. The reason I raise that is 21 because it just runs counter to, you know, the general 22 conversation that we're having, that the introduction 23 of product in and of itself will, you know, bring about 24 increases. 25 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I totally agree with 0104 1 that. Nothing is guaranteed, but if you don't put it 2 out there, you don't know whether you'll settle it or 3 not. 4 MR. MOORE: And I'll back that up and 5 state that the new paper came in, but the problem with 6 the new paper is that the majority of our bingo halls 7 that pay out $2,500, it's hard to implement this new 8 paper into the game structures that have already been 9 set up. I've seen them try it several times, and I 10 agree with Pete that, you know, sometimes you try 11 things that just don't work. And that goes along with 12 what you were saying, but I'd have to say that I'd be 13 on the side of variety is the way to go, find out what 14 does work in bingo and what doesn't. 15 MR. WHITTINGTON: Just like on paper, 16 too, Billy, when you play a bingo game and you're 17 paying out the max for all daily, you got a cap on that 18 and you can't go no further, but with instant bingo, 19 whether it's electronic or just paper wise, you can 20 sell as many as you can and make as much money as you 21 can for the charities. That's why this new innovation 22 we're talking about, we haven't changed it much and 23 it's already set, so we can sell as many pull tabs as 24 we can to make money. 25 MR. ATKINS: So are you saying the 0105 1 introduction of different types of paper would have 2 been more successful with the higher price cap? 3 MR. WHITTINGTON: Yes, it would be. 4 Because we can offer more than what I'm paying out now 5 with this special paper, but we have never used it 6 because we can't go no further. We got our game set 7 and can only give them a certain amount of ways per 8 game and it's capped out at $2,500 per session, so we 9 can't really use it to make a special deal, if you hit 10 this number, you'll win "X" amount of dollars, you 11 can't say that because it's capped out. Now we pay out 12 the max daily, but the pull tabs, we can sell as many 13 as we can per day within an hour span time. Like, 14 looking at the future, if we can get these electronic 15 pull tabs, we can sell them for the whole four hours, 16 and I think that would bring those people in for the 17 full four hours. 18 MR. DOUGHERTY: Madame Chairman, for my 19 own definition, what are -- when you're talking about 20 new paper, what are you talking about as compared to 21 old paper? 22 MR. MOORE: I guess I can answer that. 23 There's a -- manufacturer's can make the paper with a 24 pattern on it or they might have two numbers in one 25 space for each space on the card, that's called double 0106 1 bingo and the player can daub either number. It just 2 plays the game a little differently. 3 MR. DOUGHERTY: They do that like a -- 4 MR. MOORE: The problem is, we haven't 5 been able to get our hands on them as much. The 6 vendors have been reluctant to make it, and it goes 7 back to certain things. I think if the demand was 8 there, they'd make it, but the demand hasn't been 9 there. They're not willing to just warehouse the stuff 10 and hope that they can sell it, so that's been a 11 problem from my view point. 12 MR. DOUGHERTY: Thank you, Danny. 13 MR. MANIO: Excuse me, Virginia. 14 CHAIR BRACKETT: Go ahead. 15 MR. MANIO: I'd like to make a comment 16 about the attendance being disturbing, the trend, the 17 downward trend, and I think this is going back to 18 basics. The electronic -- the IBC and all of these 19 technological innovations are well and good, but the 20 audience for these products are still coming from the 21 general population of bingo, and what I think we should 22 do is concentrate really on bingo and do something with 23 the basics in the bingo games themselves, and this will 24 bring the crowd which will, in turn, feed into the pull 25 tabs and IBC. 0107 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: So continue to get them 2 in? 3 MR. MANIO: Well, I think we are 4 neglecting bingo itself by focussing too much on this 5 new technology, but people go to the bingo hall to play 6 bingo, it just so happens that they buy pull tabs too 7 or card-minding devices. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: So we need to continue 9 these things but not neglect. Is that it? 10 UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Can I make a 11 comment? Because that kind of brings us back to when 12 Billy was asking Steve about the attendance trends are 13 down, and I don't think things panned out the way we 14 thought they would when the card-minders actually came 15 in. The trend did keep going down, and I tend to 16 believe that, because of the increase in card-minders 17 in all the halls -- and believe me, I sell plenty of 18 them -- that we may have lost some paper players 19 because of the card-minding devices, so I think that 20 did escalate, maybe, the attendance dropping; although, 21 it increased the player's spend is what I think 22 occurred here. 23 That's my opinion looking at this thing 24 from a distributor's viewpoint. 25 CHAIR BRACKETT: So on a work plan, you 0108 1 would say to continue to look at the paper? 2 MS. TAYLOR: I would like to make one 3 comment. I wonder if there's some way on this 4 attendance part if we could log the attendance with 5 the -- you know, we know when we go back to '95 or '89, 6 '90, when the Lottery came in, there was the dramatic 7 drop in attendance. Does the drop in attendance 8 correspond with new items offered by the Lottery? I 9 don't play them, so I can't tell you. When is the -- 10 is it when you start having them more often, the 11 once-a-week drawings and the Harley scratch offs and 12 stuff? Is there any correlation between the drops in 13 attendance, when our attendance drops, and new products 14 offered or, you know, more things to do with their 15 discretionary dollars? 16 MR. ATKINS: This is the age-old 17 question. I know it's, you know, called the lottery's 18 fault, but you also have the introduction of the 19 pari-mutuel wagering in the state; you have the 20 introduction of high-stakes bingo on the Indian 21 reservations in surrounding states all along the 22 boarder; and you also have the introduction of casinos 23 all along the border as well for, you know, time 24 periods of casino games here in Texas, so on one hand, 25 yeah, I guess you can say that the decline, you know, 0109 1 coincides with the introduction of new lottery games, 2 but it's interesting to note that it also seems to be 3 more significant with the introduction of these 4 different types of gaming activities. 5 And, you know, I have -- I don't 6 remember if it was you, Larry, or -- but I've had 7 people in the past, you know, that are very upset that 8 the buses for the casinos, you know, actually park in 9 their parking lot and take, you know, players up to 10 Oklahoma, over in Louisiana. I know Windstar is just 11 killing organizations in North Texas. 12 MR. WHITTINGTON: And basically what 13 you're saying is that the casinos and the games and the 14 slot machines, et cetera, is taking money out of our 15 pocket, and we can't see because we don't have nothing 16 comparable to it? 17 MR. MOORE: Because it's a compilation 18 of all of these things. 19 MR. ATKINS: It's a compilation of 20 everything. 21 MR. WHITTINGTON: Well, and everybody 22 got more innovations than we do that attracts these 23 people, so they're going to go to Windstar from Dallas, 24 and I guarantee you there's going to be 90 of Texas 25 people playing at Windstar, which is about 45 minutes 0110 1 away from Dallas 2 MS. TAYLOR: So the fact is, although 3 the attendance continues to drop with the introduction 4 of electronics, it could have dropped even more without 5 the introduction of electronics? 6 MR. ATKINS: That's possible. 7 MS. TAYLOR: There's really no way to 8 tell any of that. 9 MR. WHITTINGTON: I think it would have 10 been more. I think we would have lost more people if 11 we didn't have the card-minding devices. 12 MR. PAVLOVSKY: I know I'm not going to 13 get an answer to this, but we know all of this 14 information, so why, then, does it take so long to get 15 new games or new innovations, new exciting things for 16 bingo players, into the bingo halls to play a little 17 bit of bingo while they're spending their money on all 18 these other things as well? 19 MR. MOORE: Well, Pete, there's the 20 Bingo Enabling Act. 21 MR. WHITTINGTON: We try to overcome 22 that because that's the only way we're going to survive 23 because, number one, you're not going to tell me, if I 24 can drive 45 minutes and go to Windstar and make 25 something that I love to play, that I'm just coming 0111 1 back to your bingo hall and playing the same old-age 2 thing I've been playing for years. 3 MS. TAYLOR: Remember, we did have the 4 progressive for a moment until the "no expansion of 5 gambling" took it away from us. 6 MR. MANIO: Well, thank you for 7 mentioning that. I was just going to bring it up. And 8 just for clarification, when I spoke about bingo, I 9 meant paper players as well as card-minding players, 10 but the fact is, the bingo that we play today, or the 11 prize money at least, has remained the same for 12 thousands of years, and it's so hard to compete with 13 the bingo in Oklahoma where they have $50,000 in 14 jackpot, and that's what I meant. That's why we need 15 innovation, we can bring those people back to play 16 bingo and pull tabs will follow; IBC will follow. 17 MR. WHITTINGTON: And on top of that, 18 Billy, not only do those papers -- most of the bingo 19 halls can afford to advertise there, which is the bingo 20 paper. The Freeport and the Oklahoma Reservations are 21 advertising their paper, as well, so we're dead there, 22 too; you know, we just can't afford it. 23 MR. ATKINS: Do you want that in the 24 report? 25 MR. WHITTINGTON: No. But it's 0112 1 definitely serious. I mean, I look at my bingo paper, 2 I say, come to Windstar, come here and play the slot 3 machines versus bingo. 4 MS. TAYLOR: But I do think advertising 5 is a vicious cycle. Advertising is the one expense 6 that we can cut. You can't cut the payroll or the 7 paper or the electronics. The only expense you can cut 8 is advertising; however, advertising is the only thing 9 that will get the players into our halls, so we're 10 caught in this downward spiral of cutting the 11 advertising; therefore, we cut our players, but we 12 can't afford to advertise. You've got to pay the bill 13 when it comes. 14 MR. WHITTINGTON: I just want to see one 15 time -- I don't know if it's going to be in 2004 -- 16 that the Texas Lottery Commission takes some of that 17 tax money, which is $20-plus million, whatever, and 18 spend about $3 million or $4 million on advertising for 19 bingo, that would be great, just one national 20 commercial for bingo. Tag it on the end of the Texas 21 Lottery Commission and say, please support your local 22 charities, play bingo. It would really help a lot 23 MS. GREENFIELD: I agree with you. I 24 think that's what we need to work towards. I'm sure 25 it's legislative, but if we could get some money for 0113 1 the bingo division to advertise statewide for bingo. 2 MR. MANIO: That would be a good -- 3 MS. MORRIS: I'm going to bring you back 4 to your report. Here, all this time I thought you were 5 talking about what you wanted in your report, so let's 6 get back to the report. You didn't want any of the 7 stuff that you were talking about in the report? Well, 8 let's look at the agenda and talk about what you want 9 in the report. 10 MS. GREENFIELD: Can it be in the agenda 11 that we would like to have that on the work plan? I 12 know that's part of our recommendation. 13 MR. ATKINS: You can under Item 12. 14 MS. MORRIS: You're not on Item No. 12, 15 yet ma'am. 16 MR. WHITTINGTON: Could we change to No. 17 12, please? 18 MS. MORRIS: Are you ready to take up 19 Item No. 12? Are you done with getting your report -- 20 CHAIR BRACKETT: I think we might need 21 to mention about that we looked at, you know, that 22 House Bill 2519 that contributed to a lot of the rules 23 for that. 24 MR. ATKINS: It contributed to the 25 implementation of the Sunset management report. 0114 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. 2 MS. GREENFIELD: There were some items 3 that the commission requested that we address. I hope 4 I'm saying the right thing here and not on Item 12. 5 There were two items that they asked us to investigate, 6 one dealt with the internet bingo and alternate forums 7 and the other one dealt with the smoking ordinance, 8 they wanted us to investigate that. I think it needs 9 to be in the report that they were investigated and the 10 findings were brought forth and the internet gaming 11 alternative styles are still being looked at. 12 MR. ATKINS: That's being done? 13 MS. GREENFIELD: It's being done. 14 MR. ATKINS: Right. But in terms of, 15 from the work plan, what's been done, as you mentioned, 16 there's a number of rules that have come forward that 17 the Advisory Committee worked on. They have the -- the 18 Advisory Committee conducted review and made 19 recommendations on the Bingo Bulletin. The Advisory 20 Committee has worked on the survey of bingo players, 21 and that's been completed. They have done a review of 22 the web site and made recommendations on that, so I 23 think you can also include that in the report. 24 MS. GREENFIELD: Do we need to include 25 what we haven't accomplished? Do we want a notation of 0115 1 that? 2 MR. ATKINS: I think it would just, you 3 know, be best for the commission's benefit to mention 4 those items remaining on the work plan. 5 MR. MOORE: I mean, the review of the 6 rules, we all spent a lot of time this past year in 7 some capacity on that. I mean, you know, the staff and 8 the members of the BAC, we really put some time in 9 outside of this room here. 10 MR. PAVLOVSKY: And the public members 11 as well on those committees. 12 MR. MOORE: Sure. 13 MR. WHITTINGTON: I guess what really 14 made it complete for us is, not only the BAC, like Pete 15 said, but we had a lot of public people involved with 16 understanding bingo as a whole and we all pulled it 17 together. 18 MS. GREENFIELD: What about possible 19 surveys that we need to include, that we would like to 20 have future surveys? 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: That would be under 22 Item 12. 23 Is there anything else that you would 24 like to add under Item 11: Consideration of and 25 possible discussion and/or action on the Bingo Advisory 0116 1 Committee report to the Texas Lottery Commission? 2 MR. MANIO: When is the deadline for 3 this report? 4 MR. ATKINS: I don't know that there's 5 an exact deadline for it. You know, it needs to be 6 done annually and the work plan that you have now was 7 adopted February 28th of 2003, so I would think some 8 time after that. It's not -- for example, it's not 9 noticed on the March 5th commission meeting agenda. 10 The only thing that's noticed on that agenda is 11 Virginia's report to the commission on this meeting, so 12 it would be some time after March 5th. 13 CHAIR BRACKETT: Can we look through the 14 minutes and bring up things or do we have to have them 15 on record here? The minutes are a record? 16 MR. ATKINS: The minutes are a record. 17 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. All right. Any 18 other comments? Are you comfortable with that? 19 All right. We'll move on to Item 20 No. 12, which is: Consideration of and possible 21 discussion and/or action on the Bingo Advisory 22 Committee work plan. 23 MR. ATKINS: I would suggest that the 24 place to start on that would be with those remaining 25 items. Item No. 1, the comment on the bingo industry 0117 1 needs to remain an annual activity; comment on proposed 2 rules. We would like to move forward with the Advisory 3 Committee on a review of the operator training program 4 because one of the things that the staff is working on 5 is putting that program into a video format where we 6 can provide it to organizations without them 7 necessarily having to attend the training. You know, 8 an ongoing item would be number five, the study of 9 alternative styles of play. 10 This is the appropriate point, Jack, if 11 you want to discuss the possible future surveys. We 12 would also like to work with the Advisory Committee on 13 the review of forms that are used in the division, 14 whether their application forms, quarterly reports, or 15 audit forms. And also Item Number. 9, work with the 16 Advisory Committee on the review or revision of an 17 operations manual. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Now, there's a current 19 operations manual that needs to be revised. Is that 20 correct? 21 MR. ATKINS: There's a current 22 operations manual that is actually referred to as the 23 audit forms manual, and that's the same document that, 24 I believe, was originally developed at TABC, The Texas 25 Alcohol and Beverage Commission, and came over. It is 0118 1 in need of some serious updating, and the staff would 2 also like to expand what's covered in that pretty 3 significantly and just provide a little more 4 user-friendly format to organizations, information 5 relating to the conduct of bingo in compliance with the 6 act and rules. 7 CHAIR BRACKETT: Review of the web site, 8 so the plan for the current year, does that need to be 9 continued or -- I don't know about that. 10 MR. WHITTINGTON: I think we should 11 always update that web site as much as we can for new 12 innovations and keep it with the times because we 13 can't, you know, be stalemate and leave it behind. I 14 also think we need to keep working with Billy's staff 15 and the Bingo Advisory Committee together I think when 16 it comes to the Lottery. By doing that, it just helps 17 us to keep forward and try and work our problems 18 between us and understand things when it comes to bingo 19 in Texas. 20 MR. ATKINS: Well, I think the question 21 is, Larry, given everything else on there that hadn't 22 been addressed, you know, do you want to conduct 23 another review of the web site this year or maybe wait 24 a year and do it or, you know, if you're going to keep 25 doing a lot of the same things over again, it may be a 0119 1 little difficult to get to anything new. 2 MR. MANIO: May I make a suggestion 3 along that line? I was on the subcommittee on the web 4 site and we did a lot of work with Norma Quezada, and 5 every since we submitted our recommendations, Norma has 6 actually made improvements in our web site, so, along 7 that line, I feel that it is probably not necessary to 8 have one committee for the web site this year. Maybe 9 next year we have more time to do another review. 10 MR. WHITTINGTON: That's fine. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: So you're saying leave 12 that on there or -- 13 MR. MANIO: Leave it off. 14 CHAIR BRACKETT: Leave it off. Okay. 15 MR. MANIO: The same thing goes for the 16 Bingo Bulletin. 17 CHAIR BRACKETT: Well, am I correct that 18 drastic changes have happened to the Bingo Bulletin 19 because of budget cuts? It's no longer in color and 20 that type of thing. 21 MR. ATKINS: Well, it's no longer in 22 color because of budget cuts, yeah. 23 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. And it's still 24 produced on the same schedule, the same number of times 25 per year. 0120 1 MR. ATKINS: We've reduced the number of 2 bulletins also. We've gone from six to four. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: So that's pretty 4 significant, six to four in a 12-month year, that's 5 quite a difference. 6 Is that an ongoing thing or do we 7 dismiss that and take that off? 8 MR. MANIO: Are we still on the Bingo 9 Bulletin? 10 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yes, the Bingo 11 Bulletin. 12 MR. MANIO: Yeah, I was going to make 13 the same remark that is applicable to the web site. 14 The Bingo Bulletin, the contents have changed along the 15 lines of the recommended, so perhaps it's not necessary 16 this year, but maybe next year we can do another 17 checkpoint. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Don't do it this year, 19 but don't forget it. All right. Anything else? 20 MR. MOORE: We selected subcommittees 21 for this. I mean, if we walk away from here and if we 22 need to address the operator training program, I mean, 23 we need to get a subcommittee and look at this. We 24 don't want to walk out of here and then wait three 25 months to address this again, I don't think. Am I 0121 1 wrong in assessing that? 2 MR. ATKINS: No, you're not. There are 3 two things that I think are appropriate under this 4 item, one, appointing subcommittees to eligible items 5 and, two, discussing any items that the BAC would like 6 to take back to the commission for inclusion on this 7 year's work plan. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: So are we having 9 volunteers right now? Let's look at the issues, then. 10 MR. MANIO: We have two volunteers here, 11 Virginia. We have two volunteers for the bingo forms 12 and the operations manual. 13 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Volunteers for 14 the bingo forms, those two volunteers are? 15 MR. MANIO: Patricia Greenfield and 16 Mario Manio. 17 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Comment on the 18 improvement and status of the bingo industry. 19 Proposed rules, since that's ongoing, 20 that involves the whole -- 21 Review of the operator training program, 22 I will be happy to work on that. Does anyone want to 23 work with me? 24 MS. TAYLOR: I will. 25 CHAIR BRACKETT: Suzanne Taylor with 0122 1 work with me on that. 2 In one way, I kind of hate to see it go 3 to a video because I always thought it was fun to be 4 with a big group of operators at one place. 5 Review of the bingo forms, that has 6 already been volunteered for by Patty and Mario. 7 Review of the web site, we decided not to continue 8 that. Review or revise the operation manual, is that a 9 continuing thing or have we -- 10 MR. ATKINS: Also Patty and Mario. 11 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. And then the new 12 things were the survey of the -- for prize increases. 13 Is that correct? 14 MS. TAYLOR: Future surveys. 15 CHAIR BRACKETT: Future surveys. Okay. 16 So not necessarily in the upcoming year. 17 MR. DOUGHERTY: I'll do that. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Pete, do you 19 want to work on that with Jack? 20 MR. PAVLOVSKY: Yes, ma'am. 21 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. And then the 22 advertising issue, how to implement a program there. 23 MR. WHITTINGTON: I'll do it. 24 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Anyone else want 25 to work with Larry? Danny? 0123 1 MR. MANIO: I'll work with Larry. 2 CHAIR BRACKETT: You'll work with him. 3 Okay. That makes sense, y'all are in the same town. 4 MR. WHITTINGTON: Not really. 5 CHAIR BRACKETT: Not really? 6 MR. WHITTINGTON: He's about two miles 7 away in another county. 8 CHAIR BRACKETT: All right. Well, thank 9 you, that gets us going there. 10 MR. ATKINS: Now, you have two other 11 items in your notebook. I think you addressed Jack's 12 issue of future surveys, but Mario has submitted one 13 dealing with bonds and you had one from Stephen 14 Fenoglio dealing with legislative initiatives. 15 CHAIR BRACKETT: All right. So this 16 would come up as part of the work plan or legislative 17 initiatives or would it be an agenda item? 18 MR. ATKINS: What you are working on is 19 a proposed work plan to submit to the commissioners for 20 their approval, so you would be -- you're requesting 21 that they continue the items that we've discussed, such 22 as the annual report on the Bingo industry, comment on 23 proposed rules, review of the operator training 24 program. You have proposed a new item dealing with 25 advertising and the other items contained in -- or, 0124 1 submitted, one was for Mario dealing with bond 2 requirements and the other was from Steve Fenoglio. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: And that's in your 4 notebook. So who would like to work with Stephen on 5 new legislative initiatives? 6 MR. ATKINS: I think before you start 7 assigning people, you want to make sure that that's the 8 direction the commission wants to go. 9 CHAIR BRACKETT: Well, okay. If that's 10 the direction the commissioners want us to go, then you 11 will be notified and activated for your volunteer 12 service there. 13 MR. ATKINS: And I should have spoken up 14 earlier, that would include the issue dealing with 15 advertising and bonds. I think it's relatively safe to 16 say that, as part of this continuing program, you 17 formed these other work groups on -- as a result of 18 those still pending items. 19 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Well, it would 20 include the advertising issue and the prize increase, 21 too? 22 MR. ATKINS: If you wanted to include 23 the one on the prize increase, yeah. 24 MS. TAYLOR: Is the study of alternative 25 styles of bingo on this work pad somewhere? 0125 1 MR. MOORE: It's Item 5. 2 MR. ATKINS: Yeah. The one in your 3 notebook, Suzanne, is missing a page. I think it's 4 that extra page right there. 5 MS. TAYLOR: Okay. 6 MR. ATKINS: In the notebook, I think it 7 goes from three to seven, but there was another page 8 handed out. 9 On the work group that you formed with 10 Virginia and Suzanne, the review of the operator 11 training program, the staff representatives will be 12 Marshal McDade and Norma Quezada. And I'll have to get 13 back with you on the other two, on the review of forms 14 and the operations manual. 15 CHAIR BRACKETT: Now, those are 16 separate, review of forms and operation manuals? 17 MR. ATKINS: Those are two separate 18 items, yes. 19 MR. MANIO: What about advertising, who 20 is the contact? Billy, who will be the contact for 21 advertising in the commission? 22 MR. ATKINS: I don't know at this time. 23 Again, until the commission says yes, move forward, I 24 wouldn't even really think about it. 25 MR. MANIO: Okay. 0126 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Is everybody 2 comfortable with that? I believe that concludes Item 3 No. 11. 4 Okay. Item No. 13: Now we would like 5 to have public comment. 6 MR. HUTCHINS: My name is Charles 7 Hutchins from Dallas, Texas. I heard the words awhile 8 ago "smoking ban." There's been several of them that's 9 came into the state, notably the one in Dallas. I know 10 Larry is well informed on that. They did just 11 basically destroy the charities in Dallas. It cost 12 them thousands and thousands of dollars this past year. 13 I would like to see something -- and believe me, I 14 really don't know how to go through here and do it -- 15 but we need to bring some kind of rule or play in and 16 get help from the commission, whatever we can do to try 17 to get bingo as something that is more or less taken 18 care of by the state, exempt from the cities being able 19 to come in and tell us what we can do as far as 20 smoking. 21 I don't believe anyone has a problem 22 with a smoking or nonsmoking area. You know, someone 23 proposed that we have a smoking area instead of a 24 nonsmoking area with the right filtrations and all such 25 systems, you know, and I don't believe there's any 0127 1 bingo halls that have a problem with that. I mean, you 2 want to cater to everyone; you want to cater to the 3 entire public out there, and there's people who really 4 disdain people that smoke, and then, you know, it's on 5 the other side, too. 6 We really need, you know, I think, as an 7 industry, to look at this and try to come up with a 8 reasonable something from somewhere so that we can 9 control what the cities do to the bingo halls and the 10 charities, because that's who they actually ruin; they 11 actually ruin the charities. Several of those have -- 12 and being from Dallas, I'm one of those that's had a 13 lot of charities that's lost a lot of money, and it 14 needs to be addressed. Like I say, I'm not, you know, 15 up to addressing it or knowing exactly how, but we do 16 need to address it and try to take care of that in some 17 way for the sake of the charities. 18 CHAIR BRACKETT: Let me get a point of 19 clarification on this, you are interested in having a 20 state law that would overrule a city ordinance? 21 MR. HUTCHINS: Well, state law always 22 overrules a city ordinance, but -- 23 CHAIR BRACKETT: Regarding smoking? 24 MR. HUTCHINS: What I'm trying to say is 25 that bingo is a state-regulated activity; therefore, 0128 1 you know, it seems the state would have -- or, through 2 the commission or whatever, we could, you know, work 3 out something to go through the legislative process and 4 keep them from coming in and -- like I say, you know, I 5 don't think anyone has a problem with separate smoking 6 and nonsmoking areas, even down to having just a 7 smoking area instead of the way it is now, where most 8 places have a nonsmoking area. But, you know, it 9 should be a reasonable thing to work out. I don't 10 understand why -- like the city of Dallas came in with 11 such a rule that would just destroy the charities and a 12 lot of other businesses, restaurants and everything 13 else up there. 14 MS. MORRIS: Well, I was just going to 15 say, of course, this isn't an agenda item, so you're 16 not going to deliberate amongst yourselves or through 17 him with each other. You can clarify what the 18 questions are, but, in fact, your deliberation is to 19 put it on as an agenda item for next time. He's 20 stating what he's saying to you, that's a public 21 comment. 22 Chairman, I understood you were trying 23 to clarify what he was saying to you, but I'm going to 24 interrupt you, with all respect, and say, unless you're 25 trying to clarify, if you don't understand what he's 0129 1 talking about, go ahead and ask if you don't understand 2 it, but if you truly understand what he's talking 3 about, then you are limited, put it on an agenda item 4 and have a full discussion next time, but this is 5 public comment. It is an unnoticed item to start 6 discussing smoking bans. 7 MR. WHITTINGTON: I think it's a 8 legislative issue and that's what we need to deal with 9 Steve on legislative -- 10 MS. MORRIS: With all respect, sir, your 11 deliberations, please, just take his comment, and you 12 can say next time what you think how this issue should 13 be viewed, that you believe whatever it is you think. 14 MR. ATKINS: The purpose of a public 15 comment agenda item is to allow people to come up and 16 say whatever they want, and that's it. There's no 17 discussion; there's no action, unless, under the next 18 item, the committee says, let's put a smoking item on 19 the agenda. 20 MR. HUTCHINS: That would be my request, 21 then. 22 MR. ATKINS: Right. Public comment, 23 that's it, just public comment. 24 MR. HUTCHINS: I would like to put it on 25 the BAC's agenda. 0130 1 CHAIR BRACKETT: All right. 2 MR. HUTCHINS: Thank you. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: Stephen, did you have 4 anything else? You're covered on all the items? 5 MR. FENOGLIO: I want to go home, I'm 6 not going to say anything. Thank you, Madame Chair. 7 CHAIR BRACKETT: Well, thank you. We 8 appreciate your participation. 9 Okay. Let's consider future action on 10 future meetings. We need to think about the date and 11 agenda items at this point. It's not the last time you 12 can bring an agenda item, though; it can be submitted 13 by mail. So, one would be -- how would we word this 14 about the smoking? 15 MR. ATKINS: Well, I'm not sure, and I 16 think what Larry was eluding to, which we couldn't 17 because it wasn't an item for deliberation, is the fact 18 that the Advisory Committee has done that. I mean, I 19 guess we could include a review of the last work 20 group's recommendation. And the Advisory Committee, as 21 I remember, adopted the work group's recommendations. 22 We could see if there's, you know, any change in the 23 Advisory Committee's position. 24 CHAIR BRACKETT: How do you feel about 25 that, Larry? Do you think we need to -- 0131 1 MR. WHITTINGTON: Yes, I think we need 2 to do it again. 3 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. So that will be 4 one item, review the work group's recommendations. 5 MR. WHITTINGTON: Can I say why? 6 Because in 2002 and 2003, our two halls in Dallas, 7 Texas lost $280,000 between the two years just because 8 of it, and that's why we need to put this back on the 9 agenda. 10 CHAIR BRACKETT: Who else knows that 11 they have an item now for the agenda? 12 MR. DOUGHERTY: Have we already included 13 the new survey? That's already on the agenda. Is that 14 right? 15 MR. ATKINS: Well, I think one of the 16 things we need to discuss is, I think it's the 17 commission's understanding that the work group -- that 18 the work plan is the agenda. Those are the items that 19 they're seeking input on that, you know, we're trying 20 to identify what's going to be worked on, so, yeah, we 21 did discuss that, that survey. 22 Now, in terms of the meeting date, I 23 think one of the things we need to keep in mind is 24 that, at least for the new agenda items, I don't think 25 this would apply to the existing items on the work 0132 1 plan, but for those new items that have been discussed, 2 before they can be considered, those would need to go 3 before the commission for their consideration. The 4 reason I say that is because, if it's the committee's 5 desire that those be on the next agenda, then the work 6 plan would have to go to the commission beforehand, and 7 it may not be until April, late March or April, until 8 there's another commission hearing. So, I just provide 9 you that for planning purposes. 10 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. I thought a 11 commission meeting was set. 12 MR. ATKINS: The commission meeting is 13 set for March 5th. The only item -- and the discussion 14 and adoption of a work plan for the Advisory Committee 15 isn't on that agenda. 16 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. Anything else at 17 this particular time? Are there any ongoing reports 18 that we would just have as a matter of -- like from 19 Danny's group or any of the other groups? 20 MR. MOORE: I was concerned because that 21 page was left out of all of our books. Now, part of 22 the work plan that will be presented to the commission 23 when she does this is the alternative styles of bingo? 24 MR. ATKINS: That's correct. 25 MR. MOORE: Okay. Because I know we 0133 1 said no on the web site. Right? 2 MR. ATKINS: And no on the Bingo 3 Bulletin. 4 MR. MOORE: Okay. So those are the only 5 two that really have been put off? 6 MR. ATKINS: Yeah. 7 MR. MOORE: And we're not going to set a 8 date at this point for our next meeting? 9 CHAIR BRACKETT: Yeah, I think we are 10 going to set a date. 11 MR. MOORE: Okay. But we have to wait 12 until after the next commission meeting? 13 MR. ATKINS: You would have to wait 14 until after the next commission meeting not to address, 15 for example, alternative styles of bingo because I 16 think you can do that under the existing work plan. 17 There are four items, as I understand it, relating to 18 advertising, legislative issues, bond requirements or 19 prize increases. Before you would want to address 20 those in an Advisory Committee meeting, you would want 21 to get -- you know, you would want to get approval from 22 the commission to include those on the work plan. So 23 in terms of, you know, addressing any additional 24 proposed rules, the operator training program, 25 alternative styles of bingo, and other -- well, I think 0134 1 you're going to want to clarify to the commission what 2 type of survey you're thinking about doing, but the 3 review of the forms or the review of the operations 4 manuals, I think all of these are eligible items. 5 MR. MOORE: Are they meeting every 6 month? I know they try to. 7 MR. ATKINS: They try to. 8 MR. MOORE: Okay. So we're looking at 9 March 5th, and they're meeting April -- so we can shoot 10 for maybe the last week in April. I'm just -- we could 11 always change it, but I think that, you know, we don't 12 want to let too much time elapse here, that's my 13 feeling. 14 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. So you want to 15 look at dates for setting our next meeting? And I 16 think I heard the suggestion that toward the end of 17 April would be a real good time? 18 MR. ATKINS: The last Thursday in April 19 is the 29th. 20 CHAIR BRACKETT: Okay. The last 21 Thursday in April is the 29th, and it's well past 22 Easter. Is that a good time for everybody? Is 23 10:00 still a good time? 24 All right. Then our next meeting will 25 be April the 29th at 10:00 a.m. in Austin. 0135 1 So, I feel like that we're ready to 2 adjourn and I think everyone else feels that way, too. 3 So the meeting is adjourned. It is 1:35. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 0136 1 REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION 2 3 STATE OF TEXAS ) 4 COUNTY OF TRAVIS ) 5 6 I, KIMBERLYE A. FURR, Certified Shorthand 7 Reporter for the State of Texas, do hereby certify that 8 the above-captioned matter came on for hearing before 9 the BINGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE as hereinafter set out, 10 that I did, in shorthand, report said proceedings, and 11 that the above and foregoing typewritten pages contain 12 a full, true, and correct computer-aided transcription 13 of my shorthand notes taken on said occasion. 14 15 Witness my hand on this the 16th day of 16 March, 2004. 17 18 19 _____________________________ KIMBERLYE A. FURR 20 Texas CSR No. 6997 Expiration Date: 12/31/05 21 Wright Watson Sten-tel Firm Registration No. 225 22 1801 North Lamar Mezzanine Level 23 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 474-4363 24 25 JOB NO. 040226KAF